[-] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 weeks ago

I think they mentioned somewhere that they paid attention to not force players to use it.
If I find something that needs circuits for anything but aesthetics or minor efficiency gains I will report back.

[-] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago

how about this?

They're talking about themselves in the third person. They are not as funny or as intriguing as they think they are.

[-] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago

PressAlt+F4AndIfItComesBackThenDeleteC:\Windows\System32pleaseDontMindMyWritingMyPunctuationIsNotWorking

[-] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago

If you feel like you can think clearly and are questioning if you are dreaming but are unsure, you are not.
All methods of lucid dreaming aim at making you think clearly and question if you are in a dream. With that thought, it should be quite obvious to confirm you are in fact in a dream. Dreams are really not that good, sleeping is just kinda like a heavy suspension of disbelief.

[-] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 months ago

For e621 consumption, would you recommend chips, chinese food, or something else?

[-] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 months ago

Actually should I mark it nfsw?

[-] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 8 months ago

Sample animated transparent webp:
sample.webp

[-] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

First of, your articles are about telco hardware, not smartphones software.

The german case basically boils down to Germany wanting independence in their critical infrastructure. At least officially this is so China can't affect them by for example stopping exports of repair components. Basically your source is clickbait but without the release. »German governments information security branch says no evidence of Huawei spying ... they say the boycott happened because of strategic resource independence in networking technology«

The space of classical newspaper articles is not in a good state, basically it's almost entirely propagandized to death. So you need to know your sources, please don't be the one throwing around a phys.org article on politics like it's credible information.

source on the Germany thingI could clear up this case because I happen to know that "die Zeit" (German for "the Time") is one of the few remaining relatively independent sources for stuff relating to Germany (they are biased to follow German politics in coverage but not content, currently). I also track them closely for any changes to that status, basically if they fall to anyones propaganda, the first ones to bring that to light and point it out will be the opposing propaganda. Here is their article, for your translators pleasure:
https://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2023-03/5g-ausbau-bundesregierung-verbot-huawei

your source kinda goes into that direction at the end at least

But some observers raised eyebrows at the BSI's apparent dismissal of cyber security risks concerning Huawei.

"I believe it's wrong to suggest that the concerns about Chinese espionage are unfounded and easy to detect," telecom security expert Ronja Kniep told AFP.

"Even if Huawei has no official relationship with the Chinese government, that doesn't mean Chinese services aren't using the company and its technology as vehicles for espionage."

All three of Germany's main mobile network operators use infrastructure provided by Huawei, Spiegel pointed out.

So apparently the opinion of "the BSI" here is wildly out of line with Germany's government's general opinion at the time.

but wait there's more

So apparently in Germany there is this "BSI-gate" of sorts, around the incompetence and potential Russian and Chinese relations of "Germany's Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Arne Schoenbohm" (as he is quoted in your source).
So either way this person was extremely untrustworthy in this matter here.

So now to the other source. Reuters is at least well known, and the article has an author, so that's nice.

I looked into the matter somewhat. Around the same date as your article, the BBC wrote

To monitor the company, the UK set up the Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre, which comes under the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC).

In March 2019, it said it hadn't found evidence of malicious Chinese state activity, but it did identify some serious defects in Huawei's software engineering and cyber-security competence.

Seems they harshened their stance after US influence around 2020 to me too, but it's not like they where entirely unsuspicious before that influence either.

[-] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago

just unplug it real fast when you notice while rm's still hanging in your extensive /home

[-] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

You may be thinking of other media for writing like papyrus or animal hides

[-] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago

Your link is broken, the address it leads to is "url". [link text](https://f-droid.org/en/packages/de.westnordost.streetcomplete/) would be the correct way.

Here is the working link

[-] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Someone pulled off a js injection attack, where they put javascript into some comments or messages that would get executed by others seeing it in the web interface. The js sent the session cookies to the attackers, who got some admin sessions that way and took over lemmy.world for a bit. Given they only got the logged in session on the webinterface the damage was likely contained (i.e. no data stolen for example)

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Redjard

joined 1 year ago