Not a 'new' American Dream, just one of the extremely few American Dreams left.

They love to talk smack about Sanders relative inexperience in foreign affairs, but he nails it where it matters. One of few politicians who says things like 'never again' and means it.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2017R1/Downloads/CommitteeMeetingDocument/132808

These one, oldies but goodies. If you take verbal abuse out of the equation the number drops 12 points to 28% instead of 40% and that's the biggest 'controversy' I remember about these numbers. But I don't think abuse thats only verbal helps someone think about their spouse as a good guy so imo the whole number is useful for this case. Theres also a strong bias in favor of the cops as its an observed phenomenon that cases of anything against cops, especially Domestic Violence, don't often go very far, there are very real blind spots in the justice system for cops.

Can't wait to not vote for him, really outstanding work dipshit.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Both likely. The Republicans who dislike Trump enough to vote Democrat would probably prefer RFK, as well as the republicans who dislike Trump but were gonna vote for him because they would never vote Democrat. The republicans who want to see a R president no mater what will still vote Trump no matter their thoughts on him but little is gonna change their vote. He'll probably pull a lot of middle right voters too, middle left maybe not so much. My worry is the coalition of republicans and independents who hate trump is only growing and now they have a candidate who's not a democrat and also not trump.

Its kinda funny hes basically only gonna siphon Republicans, but that still doesn't mean only Trump voters these days, interesting times.

So this means a Fed interest rate hike incoming, before too many of the poors get a shot at owning land or other wealth generating property.

Yeah, and maybe its just me, but I had never though before this meme to phrase my thoughts about it the way I did, and I like the way it explains where the 'action' is coming from very plainly, since I hear opponents of representation claim that it works in reverse and somehow the gays are forcing media conglomerates to bend to their will, instead of the media conglomerates putting out whatever extracts the most cash. Like I don't expect the right leaners I know to understand and agree with this comment I'm typing, but I really feel like I could get somewhere if I phrased it like in the one you replied to. Of course not everyone can be moved in the first place, but its the idea I get from my experiences with them.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This article is funny

But none have stepped up to condemn India for its alleged involvement in the June slaying on Canadian soil of a Sikh separatist, Hardeep Singh Nijjar. Why?

later,

Canada has yet to provide any evidence of India’s involvement in the killing. But . . .

How many guesses do we get for the question?

Thats 50% of modern journalism. The other 50% is copying police press releases verbatim without investigation.

Improvise, Adapt, Develop semi-healthy coping mechanisms.

Id say even more so. Few if any one votes for Republicans for the sole reason of them not being democrats. A much larger portion of the democrats voter base is people who simply dislike republicans more.

Welp, may as well do some burnouts since you need a new rear tire anyway.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

agitatedpotato

joined 1 year ago