[-] akash_rawal@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Windows will not boot with this method. By renaming the file back to bootmgfw.efi windows will boot again but now linux won't boot. There is no clean solution, other than switch to different computer that doesn't have this issue. Because of issues like this I don't recommend dual booting. Installing only Windows or only Linux is more manageable for not-tech-savvy people.

[-] akash_rawal@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

In windows EFI partition, there will be an EFI/Microsoft/bootmgfw.efi file, I usually rename it to bootmgfw.efi.bak and that allows grub to load.

[-] akash_rawal@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I have observed that many laptops are hard-coded to boot windows whenever possible. Even with windows bootentry missing, firmware will skip Grub set to first priority and start windows. Only way to make them start Grub is to rename bootmgfw.efi to a different name.

47

Testcontainers is a library that starts your test dependencies in a container and stop them after you are done using them. Testcontainers needs Docker socket access for mounting within its reaper, so I made a (for now minimal) different library that does not need Docker socket access. It also works with daemonless Podman.

34
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by akash_rawal@lemmy.world to c/programming@programming.dev
116
submitted 3 months ago by akash_rawal@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I took each rating for games on Wine Application Database, mapped them to numbers (Garbage -> 1, Bronze -> 2, Silver -> 3, Gold -> 4, Platinum -> 5) and plotted a monthly average.

104
20
[-] akash_rawal@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

Replacing "Programmers:" with "Program:" is more accurate.

spoilerTower of Hanoi is actually easy to write program for. Executing it on the other hand...

[-] akash_rawal@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

How I lost a Postgres database:

  1. Installed Postgres container without configuring a volume
  2. Made a mental note that I need to configure a volume
  3. After a few days of usage, restarted the container to configure the volume
  4. ...
  5. Acceptance
45
submitted 8 months ago by akash_rawal@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I was exploring direct links between machines, and basically failed to break something.

I assigned IP address 192.168.0.1/24 to eth0 in two ways.

A. Adding 192.168.0.1/24 as usual

# ip addr add 192.168.0.1/24 dev eth0
# ping -c 1 192.168.0.2
PING 192.168.0.2 (192.168.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.051 ms

***
192.168.0.2 ping statistics
***
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.051/0.051/0.051/0.000 ms
#

B: Adding 192.168.0.1/32 and adding a /24 route

# ip addr add 192.168.0.1/32 dev eth0
# # 192.168.0.2 should not be reachable.
# ping -c 1 192.168.0.2
ping: connect: Network is unreachable
# # But after adding a route, it is.
# ip route add 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0
# ping -c 1 192.168.0.2
PING 192.168.0.2 (192.168.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.053 ms

***
192.168.0.2 ping statistics
***
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.053/0.053/0.053/0.000 ms
#

Does this mean that adding an IP address with prefix is just a shorthand for adding the IP address with /32 prefix and adding a route afterwards? That is, does the prefix length has no meaning and the real work is done by the route entries?

Or is there any functional difference between the two methods?

Here is another case, these two nodes can reach each other via direct connection (no router in between) but don't share a subnet.

Node 1:

# ip addr add 192.168.0.1/24 dev eth0
# ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0
# # Finish the config on Node B
# nc 192.168.1.1 8080 <<< "Message from 192.168.0.1"
Response from 192.168.1.1

Node 2:

# ip addr add 192.168.1.1/24 dev eth0
# ip route add 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0
# # Finish the config on Node A
# nc -l 0.0.0.0 8080 <<< "Response from 192.168.1.1"
Message from 192.168.0.1
[-] akash_rawal@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

I actually like this. This would allow reuse of all the infrastructure we have around XML. No more SQL injection and dealing with query parameters? Sign me up!

[-] akash_rawal@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You have rust.

You get a horse and arrive at the castle within seconds but the horse is too old and doesn't work with the castle.

You remove the horse, destructure the castle and rescue the princess within seconds, but now you have no horse.

While you're finding a compatible horse and thinking whether you should write your own horse, Bowser recaptures the princess and moves her to another castle.

66

I am building my personal private cloud. I am considering using second hand dell optiplexes as worker nodes, but they only have 1 NIC and I'd need a contraption like this for my redundant network.

Then this wish came to my mind. Theoretically, such a one box solution could be faster than gigabit too.

[-] akash_rawal@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

You're quite bold to assume that linux users haven't built their houses with doors instead of windows.

72

Let alone including yourself in the picture. I know how you look like.

Let alone including your loved ones in the picture.

Even when their disappointment of having to face away from the monument is clearly visible in the photo.

And then you make them do stuff like 'hold the sun in your hands' or whatever.

301
7
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by akash_rawal@lemmy.world to c/programming_horror@programming.dev
[-] akash_rawal@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

~~Remove the battery~~ Wait, you can't do that these days...

[-] akash_rawal@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Everything seems to be way faster on Linux than on windows for some reason.

On one occasion I tested a build that took ~10 min on windows, in a Linux VM installed on the same machine, it finished in ~1min.

I have searched around for an answer for quite some time now, I could not find any definitive reason. Some say that process creation is slower on windows, some say IO is inefficient. Still struggling to explain 10x increase in throughput.

Here is a funny instance: https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/17783/why-does-emacs-take-longer-to-start-on-windows-than-on-linux

11
view more: next โ€บ

akash_rawal

joined 1 year ago