Yes. They deserve nothing. LIE.
How would he know? Trump doesn’t talk to him.
Unfortunately, I am not from the EU region, neither do I live in one
So, the GDPR doesn’t apply to you. So, you’re probably SOL?
What about “committed treason by selling nuclear secrets to America’s enemies” - you’ll never guess which picture that one falls under!
It hasn’t turned up anywhere else yet, so I’ve occasionally been checking the grocery store for the last few years.
Imagine hating an ordained minister for not hating enough. Ridiculous.
That's not very reassuring, we're still only one computer bug away from that situation.
Presumably she wasn't identified as a violent criminal because the facial recognition system didn't associate her duplicate with that particular crime. The system would be capable of associating any set of crimes with a face. It's not like you get a whole new face for each different possible crime. So, we're still one computer bug away from seeing that outcome.
The hero we didn’t deserve.
I prompted Bing with Ian Malcom's timeless quote, "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should," and it gave me this nightmare in return.
If you’re trying to use them correctly. Otherwise, they’re just “less lethal” and easier to deploy.
https://www.hrw.org/news/2011/12/02/eye-hunting-cairo-militarys-assault-reporters
I dunno, Folding Ideas broke down Fortnite's monetization policies, and they're pretty damn barbaric, particularly in how they target kids.
This is significant because this is the first time in the history of copyright bots that they've ever had to remove a work from the bot's registry. Given how rarely it happens, the code to do that probably won't even be worth the cost of writing for another decade or two: some guy at YouTube will just add a manual exception for that video. (And that's assuming the best of intention and action from the copy-vio-bot sellers which is unlikely, given their existing behavior.)
If she’s doing human research, she’d have to get sign off from an institutional review board who’d require that her experiment doesn’t cause lasting harm or discomfort to the participants. You know, the opposite of what she’s doing when she’s trying to get views by causing a confrontation.
Scientists are bound by these weird things called ethics, which is why there’s never been a laboratory experiment showing that smoking causes cancer in humans.
Wait till you hear about Job.