It really doesn't. But it does make raging misogynists pissy and insecure.

What they really mean is that they can't create enough articles off of what someone said on Twitter.

Should people waste thier time with a sealion?

I always get a little antsy around this kind of stuff because eventually, it's going to get to a point where it either gets treated as a diagnostic tool or insurance requirement for trans people accessing healthcare.

So, open season for Biden to get some Supreme Court justices an "early retirement" then?

A ton also passed. A growing number are working their way through the courts. The "tide" has already made millions refugees in their own country. There is a long way to go on this, I'm afraid.

So what are we gonna do about it?

Percentages based off a single, voluntary survey are not actionable without knowing the root cause. Is it because there's less trans men in general? Is it because cis people are over-represented by virtue of them being far more prevalent in society? What is the optimal ratio we're going for?

Ah, uncle Iroh, everyone's favorite barely reformed war criminal.

I will always game with the grungler.

The part that scares me in this is that it's only a story because the girl wasn't actually trans.

Just because you're into destroying unjust hierarchies doesn't mean you can't be a bottom.

Maybe they should skip their avocado toast or drink less Starbucks?