[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz 1 points 52 seconds ago

I can’t have sympathy for murderous antisemites

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz 0 points 25 minutes ago

I did back it up. I can’t make people read it, though

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz 0 points 30 minutes ago

Defense of Israel is effectively banned on Lemmy

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 hour ago

The source is Hezbollah. As I’ve told you.

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz -5 points 1 hour ago

That particular pager was in a bag, against a person, pointed away from anyone or anything else.

Where else would you carry a pager? You have to feel it when it vibrates.

Not to mention anything of the second attack, which used much larger charges and started fires and blew out windows across Lebanon.

Well, I’m sorry to hear that Lebanon’s glazers just got several months of guaranteed work, I guess, but I’m otherwise not sure why this is relevant.

And anyway, a single example isn't going to assuage anyone who has been reading reports of women and children dying from the attack.

What reports?

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 hour ago

Didn't you say they were the ones who reported your non-Hezbollah casualty figure though?

I don’t have any “non-Hezbollah casualty figures.” I’m assuming that any casualties Hezbollah doesn’t claim are the civilians.

You could just link to what you're talking about

I’m still not understand what you’re finding unclear.

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz -3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Ok, and what does this refute? I haven’t claimed there to be zero civilian casualties, but it’s currently fewer than one in one thousand.

Again, I’ve posted video. Why would I believe that could harm anyone but the bearer?

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 hour ago

I’m assuming that, out of the total reported casualties, the ones Hezbollah doesn’t claim are the civilians. Can you explain your issue with that reasoning?

I’ll grant that there may be Hezbollah casualties that Hezbollah won’t publicly claim, but that would strengthen my case, not yours.

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 hour ago

I’m clearly in good faith

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 hour ago

I’m not saying we need to respect it, but the mail shouldn’t censor materials based on viewpoint.

Not censoring isn’t “respect”, it’s the minimum a free people should expect from their government.

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz 16 points 4 hours ago

It’s good actually that the mail doesn’t censor based on viewpoint

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 hours ago

Yup, and it seems like more and more that it wasn't explosives, but regular pagers tampered with to explode using parts they already contain as to not arouse suspicion.

Totally false.

view more: next ›

crashfrog

joined 5 days ago