No, because an attacker could still make their own network filesystem that does whatever they want. MS needs to update critical auth methods to not assume that the filesystem will play ball.

If you haven't, check out Combined Arms. It is an OpenRA mod that brings in a lot of units and design from RA2, Generals, and C&C3.

Exactly. If you implement DRM that will make the software unusable if it can't phone home, you should be legally required to have a plan in place for when your servers shut down.

MMO servers get a bit more complicated since they often rely on third-party components that aren't releasable.

Only if the publisher has taken steps to stop individuals from preserving them through more traditional means.

If you like the goofy side of Bojack's comedy, check out Olde English Comedy. It's a comedy group Bob-Waksberg was part of in college and it has a lot of great skits.

His production company splash comes from one of their worst videos.

More biomes don't fix the fundamental flaw in the design. It treats planets the same way Raft treats islands. They become purely a resource hunt for the player, no matter what skin they have.

Raft gets away with it by having your base travel with you, being incredibly hostile, and being short enough that the loop doesn't get tiring.

That's what usually happens with tarrifs. Unless there's a ton of other competition, domestic producers just increase their prices by the same amount.

I feel the need to point out that a float isn't an integer with a decimal stuck on. A floating point number is called that because the precision on both sides of the decimal point changes depending on the size of the number.

It's actually stored as an exponent and a value to apply the exponent to. This allows you to express incredibly tiny numbers and incredibly large numbers, but the gaps between representable numbers is inconsistent.

You know how 10 / 3 * 3 is often not 10 because the decimal representation loses the repeating .33? In float, you run into the same issue but in much less predictable places.

Probably. She was not found guilty of lying about her reason for selling the stock in question, though she was found guilty of obstruction and other lies, along with conspiracy.

She was never charged with insider trading, so if she hadn't lied, she would likely have been fine.

Interestingly, they also charged her with securities fraud. They argued that, as the face of a publicly traded company, covering up a crime was market manipulation even if it had nothing to do with that company. The judge dismissed that charge.

Boeing doesn't make engines.

Also, this is a nine-year-old plane. It has had at least one total tear down by Southwest.

Friendly reminder that the investigation was into a real estate deal, not a blow job. That was a bonus when they got nothing in the real investigation.

And guess who makes a ton of Airbus components? Spirit, the company that has caused nearly all of the recent 737 issues.