This may shock readers of the Washington Examiner, but it's a plus for him in my book.
Jeremy Corbyn was the best thing to happen to Labour in a long time, but the Blairy types all panicked when faced with actual policies to benefit poor people.
USB sticks and SSDs are no good for long-term storage. The data on them degrades rapidly if they're not powered up. Spinning disks last longer. So your process would be better done with those.
It's a shame their capacity lags so far behind current hard drives. And not many drives for these discs are still made, so what are the chances of them becoming unreadable just because no one has equipment to read them?
In the short term. In the long term they'll be better off. But apparently the long term doesn't matter to them when there are short-term gains to be had.
Doesn't sound like that's his plan:
So, hear me when I say this: no more money without reform.
Sounds like he wants to change the NHS's priorities before making any new investment.
You're right. The hope is that they're not enough and he fails to attract anyone else.
It will not put off his voters. Some of them just don't care about anything international. Others admire Putin as a strongman who isn't afraid to kill his enemies and persecute minorities, a moral conservative, a self-professed Christian, an ally against democracy and a defender of the same bigotries they share.
Man, these NYT headlines. In the article they admit there's no evidence to support Israel's claims that Hamas militants were hiding in the schools and shelters they bombed - all they have is the IDF's word. But in the headline they definitely spin it a different way.
$20 per month would be enough to discourage me. It's another relatively costly computer-related subscription and I already feel like I'm losing a battle to keep those minimal. There would have to be some very clear benefits for that price.
Who is "him"?