I am Jack's complete lack of surprise
From that photo alone, that looks like someone didn't want to deal with changing the outlets when they painted the walls and that's just paint warn off of a dark brown receptacle from many years of plugs being inserted.
As one who has done many dumb things in my life, evidence of small electrical fires would be whispy smokey gray possibly with some meltiness.
Side note, autocorrect tried to make "dumb" be "fun" and I couldn't feel more seen right now.
I guess that's a caption not a "what's going on" but I'm sticking with it
The poor tree never crossed tiger again
Book bans all the way down
Shit. You spoke of it. Sorry for your loss.
That's a good point, and lithium batteries get sparky when the lithium gets exposed. In the boat example I'm not going to worry too much about lead acid batteries, if they leak it should dilute quickly. Honestly unless punctured, I'm not going to worry about the lithium batteries really either. You typically find out about punctures in those rather quickly. Like before the water is the issue.
It's probably NaCl
In other news, several border patrol agents seen chasing tornado with tasers drawn.
Ok, I don't know why I'm even bothering, but here's why I think this is nothing more than conjecture at best and probably just outright dishonest manipulation.
-
OP's link cites directly the eo announcement, that's where I found the link it. The announcement says literally nothing about scanning your photos and documents. It's about making sure aps aren't sharing your shit in the background. That ai generators aren't marketing it for creating revenge/child porn, aren't monetizing it if they do, protecting your photos and docs from being stolen and disseminated without permission. Not one thing indicates it's about scanning what shit you have on your phone.
-
OP's link, links to another blog/opinion piece that seems to be the source of the "scanning photos for bad content" junk that I'm claiming has no logical source and is made up bs to rile up the already haters
President Biden wants to probe everyone's smartphones as part of a sweeping surveillance effort.
From which I quote
This proposal implies that mobile operating systems would need to scan and analyze images directly on users’ devices to determine if they are sexual or non-consensual.
There's no linked document evidence of what the op or either of the 2 level deep op-eds are claiming. There is no source beyond the above quote claiming it's implied. It's literally made up. The linked eo announcement says nothing about scanning your phone for what types of content/documents you have.. I read nothing anywhere that implies this.
I don't want shit scanning my phone. I think we all agree that's definitely a long way over the line. I see nothing that indicates that's what this is even remotely close to doing. So why is it being shared and claimed that it is?
pezmaker
joined 1 year ago
Classic case of know your audience. I don't think this is going to be a particularly unpopular opinion here. I know my personal anecdote doesn't mean everyone else agrees with me, but myself and most people I know with social media have dramatically backed off. I think if it weren't for fb shoving strangers and paid content in my face, my feed would be dead. As it stands I only even log in for my bootleg weather guy's posts.