371

I saw this circulating around and thought it was an interesting read.

Some of these are horrendous, some are funny, and a few made me think "Hmm, maybe not a bad idea"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maalus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

How would that work with inflation / deflation I wonder, you hit the limit, can't make anymore, you retire, all is well. Then what, you need to get rid of 5% of your wealth? How do you define the limit, dollars in X year? Why that arbitrary amount?

[-] Spitzspot 42 points 1 month ago

A progressive wealth tax with the final bracket being 100% at $24.4 million.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

I seriously support this

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago

We make minimum wage an arbitrary amount untied to inflation. This would be the same.

[-] basmati@lemmus.org 9 points 1 month ago

Tie it to inflation, set the number high enough to maintain an upscale property and life for 100 years (that way babies inheriting money won't suffer), and enforce it via military strikes on offenders and their families.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
371 points (98.9% liked)

Just Post

634 readers
3 users here now

Just post something ๐Ÿ’›

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS