Hi, I had trouble coming up with a title, sorry.
So I met 2 people in an RPG chatroom and we decided to start a game in the near future. We've moved to a separate chatroom to start preparing. This chatroom had been previously used by another player on a similar campaign, but was empty.
Soon after, another persons joins the chat. Reading the chat history, they appear to have been the GM for that previous campaign. I waved at their entry, making my presence known. This was their only text message:
Hi __. Good to see you back in the game.
I'm interested in playing but I'll let you know straight off; I can only play on .
Is that okay for your other players?
This isn't sitting right with me.
- No introduction.
- Talking about me like I'm not there.
- A certain attitude in setting terms to a game they're not organizing.
- The person they're talking to can't answer the question, and I wasn't addressed, so what now?
Am I reading too much into this? Is this just they trying to communicate efficiently plus a lack of social polish?
Anyway, I'd love some external perspective.
Edit: thanks everyone, I'm glad I took the time to gather your input. I wasn't sure I was reading the situation correctly and it looks like indeed I wasn't.
Maybe just say "Hey, X isn't running this game. I am". If you're open to their participation, you could add "But if you'd like to join us, would you mind introducing yourself?". If you don't want them to join, you could say "Sorry, but I already have enough players for this campaign"
Thanks!
I’d also consider if this person has admin privileges to the room, so you can have a backup way to contact the group if you’re kicked.
If it comes to that, I think I’d rather not play with that group. But thanks.