this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
267 points (85.8% liked)

Crazy Fucking Videos

6472 readers
24 users here now

Dive into the World of Insane Videos!

Rules

  1. No hate speech of any kind.
  2. Content warnings are required in post titles where applicable. Example: [CW: Injury]
  3. Use your best judgement and mark NSFW posts as such.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Were they actually breaking any law or did the government just decide it wanted to give them a beating?

[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 100 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe a hot take but if you are breaking the law, you should still not receive a beating.

Before police attacks a crowd like that, they give a warning to stop whatever illegal activity the protesters are doing.

Agreed otherwise. Force should only be used if absolutely necessary.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The German state is incredibly repressive against solidarity for Palestine.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Is it? We had many peaceful demonstrations.

When it got problematic was when people on demonstrations shoutet that they wanted a kalifat (don't know how to write the word) and "from the river ...", because Hamas and other people interpret it differently.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not only happening on protests. People get exmatriculated or their visas revoked if they go to the wrong protest camp or post the wrong things on facebook. You can also get your citizenship denied if you have the wrong opinions on Iserael, since the IHRA is official stance of the state.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think, this is a quite biased (at least not accurate) representation of what is happening.

You can probably find single examples of all of that above, e.g. for exmatriculation, but when you dig deeper, there are probably hurdles for that:

Konkret soll exmatrikuliert werden können, wer Gewalt anwendet oder dazu auffordert, wer wegen einer Straftat „zulasten eines Mitglieds der Hochschule“ rechtskräftig verurteilt wurde, oder wer Einrichtungen der Hochschule zu strafbaren Handlungen „nutzt oder zu nutzen versucht“

You can also get your citizenship denied if you have the wrong opinions on Iserael, since the IHRA is official stance of the state.

This "stance of the state" thing is not law. There were for sure public discussions about denying citizenship for people who oppose democracy or the right of Israel to exist. But let me be honest: If someone opposes democracy or freedom or thinks that Israel or any other country should be fully destroyed, I don't need such a person in my country. But if your opinion is that Netanyahu is an a-hole and that his far-right government buddies only want more war and death, no one will do anything with your citizenship because of that.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 week ago

You can probably find single examples of all of that above

Here's an interview of a student about how the state tries to break the protests.

Exmatriculation might be quite rare. But the Staatsschutz telling the BAMF to revoke visas, based on Facebook posts most certainly is not. It's just not the kind of things you're gonna read in the SZ, or Welt.

This "stance of the state" thing is not law.

Yes, because the German constitutional court wouldn't allow that kind of law. It is however a soft-power tool to shape political discourse in favour of Netanyahu.

There were for sure public discussions about denying citizenship for people who oppose democracy or the right of Israel to exist.

I findeyour faith in the organs of the state a bit naive.You can check out yourself how these decisions not to grant citizenship are carried out. If you ask me: most of the questions the judge uses to determine whether or not someone is "opposing democracy" wouldn't get a correct answer from most Germans.

[–] Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Tells me your brainwashed. You know the internet is free right, there's a boy younger than 10 being chased by 2 or 3 police men for having a Palestinian flag while he runs for his life and then is beaten. This "kalifat" bs you're talking about is just straight up lies

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You will find anything on the WWW, if you just look for it. Whether it's a person with a rainbow flag, a woman, or a person of any religion getting beaten up. Just open Twitter and there you go...

What do you mean bs? It was a video in which people demanded a kalifat for Palestine and the others wanted one in Germany. I do not say that everyone thinks like this. I have only described what was the situation here, what went through the media and press and that that was interpreted as a no-go here in Germany.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that the people "demanding a Kalifat" won't be demonstrating on a women's march. O.o

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe, you misunderstood my comment:

Is it? We had many peaceful demonstrations. When it got problematic was when people on demonstrations shoutet that they wanted a kalifat (don’t know how to write the word) and “from the river …”, because Hamas and other people interpret it differently.

I did not state that the kalifat shouts happened during the protest you saw in that video. That was months ago. And it was not a protest for women at all. The participants were even separated by gender, if I remember correctly.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But I'm not arguing for obvious islamists. I'm arguing that every Palestinian protest (even those on women's march) are suspicious for the German state.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Maybe because of what happened months ago with the kalifat stuff?

I'm honest with you... I haven't heard much about that kind of protest lately in Germany and don't have insider knowledge what parts of the state, the government or the 16 sub-governments might find suspicious or not.

Let's just agree that it'd be good for everyone, if the protesters managed (maybe, they already did, I don't know) eliminating the islamists out of their groups.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe because of what happened months ago with the kalifat stuff?

Nope, it's because of the "Staatsräson". Sudent protestors on German Unis most likely don't want anything to do with the kalifate.

Let's just agree that it'd be good for everyone, if the protesters managed (maybe, they already did, I don't know) eliminating the islamists out of their groups.

🙄

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

that every Palestinian protest (even those on women's march) are suspicious for the German state.

When reading how the police described what happened there....

Something like that never happens at an average pride parade. Why does it happen during Palestine related protests? If you are the police and experience that, I can imagine them trying to be more prepared the next time and expect the worst-case, just in case....

Der Auslöser der gewaltsamen Szene fehlt im rund eine Minute langen Videoausschnitt, die Auseinandersetzung ist bereits im vollen Gange. Wie die Polizei am Sonntag mitteilte, griffen Teilnehmer:innen während der Demonstration die Einsatzkräfte wiederholt an.

Bereits kurz nach Beginn der Versammlung mit dem Titel "Internationaler feministischer Kampftag" seien israelfeindliche Sprechchöre angestimmt sowie strafbare und eindeutig polizeifendliche Parolen gerufen worden, teilte die Polizei mit. Die Einsätzkräfte hätten immer wieder tatverdächtige Personen festgenommen, daraufhin sei es zu versuchten Gefangenenbefreiungen und tätlichen Angriffen gekommen. "Die Polizeieinsatzkräfte wurden teilweise mit gezielten Faustschlägen, Tritten und Flaschenwürfen angegriffen und wendeten daraufhin wiederholt körperlichen Zwang an und setzten Reizstoffsprühgeräte gegen die Teilnehmenden ein", hieß es am Sonntag.

Bei einem Vorfall hatten Demonstrationsteilnehmende laut Polizei versucht, die Festnahme zweier Frauen zu verhindern, die mehrfach strafbare Parolen gerufen haben sollen. Die Polizei habe die Frauen daraufhin nach Absprache in eine Feuerwache in der Wiener Straße gebracht. Mehr als 100 Personen hätten versucht, in Richtung der Feuerwache zu gelangen und hätten die Einsatzkräfte "massiv körperlich bedrängt". Die Polizeibeamten hätten daraufhin "Zwangsmaßnahmen in Form von Schieben und Drücken" angewendet "sowie selektiv gezielte Faustschläge, Tritte und Pfefferspray" eingesetzt.

Insgesamt nahm die Polizei bei den Versammlungen am Samstag 12 Männer und 16 Frauen vorübergehend fest. Zudem wurden 33 Strafermittlungsverfahren unter anderem wegen besonders schweren Landfriedensbruchs, Gefangenenbefreiung, tätlichen Angriffs, Widerstands gegen Vollstreckungsbeamte und Verwendens von Kennzeichen verfassungswidriger und terroristischer Organisationen eingeleitet. Sieben Polizeibeamte seien verletzt worden, alle hätten im Dienst bleiben können.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're aware that the police is a biased participant in the conflict and you're not really arguing against my point, right?

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, but the protestor who uploaded a clip that did not show what happened before, is not biased??????

You only accepting the one side and one part of what happened there, makes you biased as well.

To be honest: I don't even know what your point is. Mine is: There is a bigger picture and we both haven't seen it.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Never said the proetestors aren't biased. There's no such thing as an unbiased perspective. I just wanted to make sure that you know that a police report should not be treated as a "factual" report (or copying one should not be counted as "journalism", as a slight tangent).

My original point was this (you could have looked it up - it's not gone):

The German state is incredibly repressive against solidarity for Palestine.

How does the fact that the police admit that they arrest protestors for chanting slogans that criticize Israel refute my point in any way?

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The truth is somewhere between. That's kind of obvious........

You won't get arrested for critizing Israel. That's not illegal here.

If you shout that Israel should be destroyed or that all Jews should ..., then you might get arrested, but that's not criticism.... You can replace the country or religion with any other... Hate speech is not tolerated in Germany and that's good.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

You won't get arrested for critizing Israel. That's not illegal here.

You do run the risk of losing your visa, or getting deported, if you're not a German citizen. And you might get sued for relatively minor things, if the case is connected to palestine solidarity. Also, judges and prosecutors will judge you more harshly, due to the Bundestagsresolution.

Here's an article on the matter

Der Antisemitismusbeauftragte der Bundesregierung fordert härtere Strafen für vermeintlich antisemitische Vorfälle sowie den Einsatz von Sicherheitsbehörden wie dem Verfassungsschutz an Universitäten. Ferner sollten Aussagen wie „From the River to the Sea“ unter Strafe gestellt werden: „Mit Prävention allein kommen wir dem grassierenden Antisemitismus nicht bei.“

If you shout that Israel should be destroyed or that all Jews should ..., then you might get arrested, but that's not criticism.... You can replace the country or religion with any other... Hate speech is not tolerated in Germany and that's good.

My whole point is that criticism of Israel is equated to anisemitism. That's the whole deal behind the ISRHA definition.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No those are government and media lies to justify the violence. Germany supplies 30% of the weapons for the genocide in Palestine. They are next to the US the most repressive country.

German police have beaten up protesters holding Palestinian flags without any cause. Many examples have been posted in this community. Example from 4 months ago https://lemmy.world/post/21657306 (Direct link to the video: https://imgur.com/SWM4K8H)

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't know the context of the video.

But yes, covering your face on a demonstration is illegal and can lead to up to 1 year in jail.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermummungsverbot

[–] punksnotdead@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 week ago

Up to 1 year in jail and 20 punches to the face apparently...

[–] DaveyRocket@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

How are you going to build a fascist database of enemies if the protestors cover their face?

[–] Peter_Arbeitsloser@feddit.org 18 points 1 week ago

https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/berlin-polizei-ermittelt-in-mehr-als-30-faellen-nach-frauentag-demos-dpa.urn-newsml-dpa-com-20090101-250309-930-398564

"They are being investigated for particularly serious breach of the peace, liberation of prisoners, resisting law enforcement officers and using symbols of unconstitutional and terrorist organizations."[...]

"Seven officers were injured, but were able to continue their duties. Journalists were also attacked. 28 people were reportedly arrested." [...] "Participants also used umbrellas to block the view of a pro-Palestinian block. Some police officers were attacked with bottles, kicks and punches. Officers then “repeatedly used physical force”, it was reported."

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pretty sure nowadays in germany the palestanian flag basically counts as promoting a terrorist organization. So yeah they broke the law but the law is bullshit and still shouldnt allow the officers to exert physical violence.

[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You can fly the Palestinian flag just in Germany. Some slogans are typically illegal at protests like „from the river to the sea“ and a bunch of other stuff. Every protest gets its own extra rules, if deemed necessary. For example chants in Arabic might be forbidden because of incitement or hate speech in Arabic at related previous protests.