this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
584 points (94.5% liked)

Political Memes

9379 readers
3186 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Grassroots organization will save us.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 119 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Absolutely vote for whatever your personal issue is in the primary. Make your voice heard and let the candidates know about it.

Come general election, you vote against the Nazi. I don't give a fuck if the Dem doesn't like your issue, I'll even donate to change their mind, but damn well show up and vote for them.

[–] vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 67 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Come general election, you vote against the Nazi. I don't give a fuck if the Dem doesn't like your issue, I'll even donate to change their mind, but damn well show up and vote for them.

Unless he’s Zohran, then we clutch pearls and support the corrupt creepy predator guy.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've heard this brought up a lot. First of all, fuck Cuomo. Any rational person should be supporting Zohran over any of the other candidates.

But also, is there an actual worry about the ticket getting split or non-votes and allowing the Republican to win? That's essentially what "vote Blue" is about.

Also, progressives have one candidate that is obviously better than the alternative, even if they don't like both. Moderates aren't necessarily convinced. It's just a different argument.

Although, if they are and they still just don't like them, I'm 100% telling them to get off their ass and vote to stop the nazis.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

is there an actual worry about the ticket getting split or non-votes and allowing the Republican to win

Nope. The Republican candidate is perennial loser and insanely racist vigilante Curtis Sliwa. Nobody thinks he has a chance, including himself. He's purely in it for the PR and donations.

That's essentially what "vote Blue" is about.

Nope. That's their excuse to force "electable" (read: right wing and corrupt) candidates on voters who would much rather have someone who'll faithfully represent their wants and needs but scared of getting someone even worse.

Adams the fascist cop (but I repeat myself) won his primaries by a fraction of a percentage (after a full court press propaganda campaign on his behalf by both major parties and all NYC-based MSM) and they were immediately falling over each other to declare him "the future of the party"

Mamdani beats the establishment favorite in a surprise landslide and they're all pretending that he's a communist terrorist that somehow snuck in against the will of everyone.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The "Vote Blue No Matter Who" is in fact about keeping Republicans out of power. I've been telling people to vote blue no matter who in reference to Mamdani, who is supported by the vast majority of state and federal democrats and trouncing all other candidates combined in polls including the Trump supporting third party Cuomo.

The reason there is a perceived rift is because monied powers such as Israel and China WANT there to be a rift.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If that's what it is about it failed. We need to move on.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] griff 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Sure, but Gavin Newsom might very well also be a Nazi. If you're from California, then you're probably aware that he's not exactly defending the the sanctuary state that he's been charged to lead. He's also kind of giving mayors carte blanche (and State-level support) to "clean up" homeless encampments, and he's publicly stated that he doesn't believe that "trans athletes should be allowed to compete against girls" in and interview with Charlie Kirk, and then recently doubled down on that.

So what do you do when both Candidates want to fuck the world?

Obviously the fascist party is accelerating things quickly, but the Democrats aren't doing anything to slow it down. Just as in every single case of a fascist takeover ever, the liberals enable the fascists. They keep trying to shift to the right to "capture voters" which literally has never worked, but they keep trying. Why?

[–] yamper@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i can't believe after the dissolution of checks and balances and the ongoing kidnapping of hispanic people nationwide we're still having this conversation.

obviously newsom is actively awful. but calling it "both candidates want to fuck the world" is so narrow-minded knowing everything that is happening to america every day right now.

it's frustrating to be an american and be given two choices who both suck. one choice sucks so much more. not playing along in this fucked up democracy puts american people in danger.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I don't think "sucks so much more" is all that accurate though. Both candidates do want to fuck the world.

Where were the checks and balances when the Democrats were Drone-Striking kids? Where were the checks and balances when the Democrats were mass-deporting people? Where were the Checks and balances for torture programs, killing americans, giving our tax money to their rich friends, building out surveillance programs, backing a genocide, etc?

Yes, one side is worse, but the supposed "opposition" is doing everything they can to get as close to the worse side as they can.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There are no small wins anymore. Harm reduction is important, but it's also important to understand what is happening right now. That's all I'm saying. The Democrats will not be your salvation, they will be your slow demise. The Republicans will be your quick demise. People need to take to the streets, not the ballots. If you can't see that, then you're still living in the past. Listen to yourself: "compete dissolution of checks and balances" but you still think we can reform it all better?

C'mon, you don't seem to be that out of the loop. Surely you get it by now? I don't think you deserve to have a master

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

not the ballots

Go to the ballots and vote for who you want. Will it be sufficient, dunno, but it is absolutely needed to put in at least that effort.

Historically non-democratic means of overthrowing a previously democratic systems do not end well...

[–] piefood@feddit.online 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I'm not sure you understand my position. I'm against the Democrats and the Republicans. I don't think voting will be our solution. I'm pretty sure that I never said we can reform it, and I think we're gonna have to tear it all down and start over.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

Their comment reads like they responded to the wrong person.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Responded to the wrong person. Sorry about that

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

not playing along in this fucked up democracy puts american people in danger.

Yet playing along seems to have led to fascism. Voting clearly is not enough, we have to take action outside of the system. Our fucked up electoral system could not be relied upon before and it definitely can't now with a fascist in office doing everything he can to rig it in his favor. We need more people to become disillusioned with our electoral system because it is dead now, and believing in the fantasy that we can vote our way out of fascism isn't going to do anyone any favors.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

One person thinks trans people shouldn't be allowed to compete in sports.

The other person thinks that trans people shouldn't be allowed to live.

Please help I can't figure out how these two are different

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There is no difference. One side is just more honest

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago

I can't believe this is such a hard thing for people to understand.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'll take the side that dishonestly gives trans people their rights except for sports.

[–] Corn@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you believe he would stop a red state from enacting and enforcing anti trans legislation?

If the answer is no, he is not functionally different.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I'm willing to give up my non existent dreams of Basketball Stardom to ensure my survival

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

and then recently doubled down on that

Wait seriously? I was really hoping he would do the opposite and call it a "lapse in judgement"

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And because there are way more fascist friendly neoliberals than there are progressives it will never be someone you actually want to vote for.

This has been the pattern for my entire life and expecting this stupid country full of idiots to change is a recipe for disappointment.

[–] Corn@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Except the left has policy that directly improves the material conditions of people. Free Healthcare polls overwhelmingly better than "means-tested subsidies for insurance through 50 different marketplaces where you have no idea what you will pay at any point".

The people don't have coherent ideologies, but they know healthcare, rent, school are too expensive and wages are too low.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Your heuristic is easy to beat. A Nazi just needs to run as a Democrat, hide their true feelings until the general election, and they can trick you into voting for them every time.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

You must be working for Fetterman

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

Well they can trick you into voting for them the first time, anyways

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Corn@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nah, we need to let the DNC know that conservatives are unelectable in the general so they don't ratfuck they way through the primary again. Saying it now, I will not vote for republican-lite

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And why is this even a conversation now? There is literally no reason for anyone to care about the 2028 election. I mean hell, in all likelihood you won't even get to have real elections in 2028 at this rate, so now in 2025 go do something about it.

I'll even donate to change their mind,

That... makes no sense.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Giving politicians money to change their mind is straight up how Dems operate. They're barely even shy about it.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah but you need a lot of zeros and commas on that check for them to give a damn

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Less than you'd think, but hey - they didn't say how much they were gonna spend.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Less than I think is still more than I can spare.

But, hey, good to know that our politics are hopelessly corrupt and can be purchased for mere hundreds of thousands of dollars and not millions.

I’m sure those poor millionaires are happy about that.

Tens, actually. But yeah

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Nah i'm done playing this no sensical game. If I vote, it's for PSL and any other third party option. Not like voting for a Dem in my state of Missouri will do anything so might as well vote for who I actually want to support and stop doing the "hold your nose and vote for the slightly less bigoted fascist".

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I used to think the same until Georgia flipped blue for Biden.

It's possible and better then the alternative. Hell if your vote even just helps flip a house seat it is a drastic improvement

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)