this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
53 points (98.2% liked)

Canada

10431 readers
1143 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

His track record suggests that climate is a priority for him.

That's what I thought too. But the projects his government is embarking on directly support existing businesses, mostly in the oil and gas sector. Those benefit shareholders who are generally more affluent than average Canadians.

His government has not announced projects that will benefit average Canadians. Nor has it announced projects that will lower our greenhouse gas emissions.

Rather than "pausing" the EV mandate, they could have said that they're legislating tighter standards for ICE emissions, requiring standardization for EV chargers. But it's support for the fossil fuel industry from top to bottom.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, I certainly do not want the government making it harder for the economy to succeed at this exact moment. That is for sure.

I am not sure people understand the danger we are in. If we have a second Great Depression, the climate is going to get screwed. I promise you that.

As for EV charging standardization. The market has already done this. Tesla style chargers are now the NACS (North American Charging Standard) and pretty much all new EVs are being manufactured to that standard.

If we stopped taxing foreign EVs, ICE emissions would also take care of themselves. Predating the mass adoption of EVs seems like quite a big gift to the fossil fuel industry.

That said, no pipelines in Carney’s nation building projects. That seems like a pretty big miss if the goal was “support for the fossil fuel industry from top to bottom”.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

If we have a second Great Depression, the climate is going to get screwed

That's debatable. A reduction in consumption would probably reduce GHG emissions.

As for EV charging standardization. The market has already done this.

There's a long way to go. There are many charging networks, each with their own apps and and idiosyncracies. Some manufacturers (I'm thinking of Volkswagen) have restrictions on how their vehicles can be charged, otherwise the warranty is voided.

Until charging is as simple as plugging the vehicle in at a charger, and tapping how much the owner wants to spend, it's too complicated.

That said, no pipelines in Carney’s nation building projects. That seems like a pretty big miss if the goal was “support for the fossil fuel industry from top to bottom”.

Doubling throughput of LNG through Kitimat is a pretty nice gift.