this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
1220 points (98.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

9296 readers
2545 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 178 points 1 week ago (28 children)

another "let's set some arbitrary line down the road to avoid doing anything today"

you already live under a fascist regime you cowards... DO SOMTHING! take action NOW

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You decide to take action. Please roll for initiative.

rolls 1

You slip and fall on banana peel. You ran out of action points.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What a strange mix of RPG tropes. I get what you meant but that's like when you see "hacking" on tv.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I’ll be honest. I never played DND and only know it from memes. I was trying to make a funny. 😔

Edit: the rpg part probably stems from Baldur Gate 3. 🤷‍♂️

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Heh, that would've been my guess. Nothing to be embarrassed about! Your joke worked. It was just weird to see all those concepts put together in a way they wouldn't go in an actual game. (DND doesn't have action points, for starters)

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But Baldurs does right? I played it for like 2 minutes 😂

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not in the sense people usually use the phrase "action points".

In D&D, on your turn, you get one action. That might be hitting someone with a sword, casting a spell, or whatever. You can also move, but that's not typically an "action". Some classes also get what are confusingly called "bonus actions", which are extra things you can do on your turn. Rogues, for example, can try to hide as a bonus action even after they did a normal action like shoot someone. A regular fighter who shot someone with a bow wouldn't be allowed to try to hide on the same turn, but the rogue could.

Because you only get one action (and bonus actions), no one calls them action points. You might say "you already took your action" or something.

Compare with a game like the original Fallout. You get a number of action points based on your stats. For an average character, it's 7. Shooting someone typically takes 2, a called shot takes 3. I think movement also takes action points. So on your turn you might shoot someone 3 times (six action points) and move a little (1 action point). Or take a called shot (3 AP) and move a lot (4 AP). Lots of options. Divinity Original Sin 1 and 2 also use action points in a similar way.

This is way more explanation than you probably needed. The key thing is on D&D you typically do one thing on your turn (eg: attack, cast a spell). Pretty much every action has the same "cost" in this sense. You can't really mix and match, and there's not as much tactical depth on your turn. (Pathfinder 2e gives you three actions per turn, but I don't think anyone calls them points there, either.)

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Pathfinder 2e gives you three actions per turn, but I don’t think anyone calls them points there, either

Yeah, they're just actions. Though the original joke kinda works, because the way Pathfinder frames it is that you gain actions at the start of your turn, so it's more conceivable that something could prevent you from gaining those actions, or could take them away. (Indeed, the "Slowed" condition says that you "When you regain your actions, reduce the number of actions regained by your slowed value", as a similar example.) Even though they're not called points, they do kinda act like that kind of a resource.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do you crit-fail your players on initiative roles? Brutal 😮

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you crit-fail your players on ANYTHING? I can't imagine the dm ideas for how one in twenty swings should send your sword flying into the ether.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I crit fail my players on skill checks if they have a negative with modifiers.

"Oh you rolled a -1 on your lockpicking roll? Sorry bucko, you broke your pick off deep in the lock because what you thought was a false set was your tensioner slipping"

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Pathfinder's four degrees of success system is so good here. A crit is any time you beat the DC by 10. A crit fail is any time you get 10 less than the DC. The system itself then tells you on a bunch of different spells/actions/effects what happens on a crit/success/fail/crit fail. It's handy because often this means a regular fail can still mean something good happens for you. In the case of lockpicking:

Critical Success You unlock the lock, or you achieve two successes toward opening a lock that requires more than one success. You leave no trace of your tampering.
Success You open the lock, or you achieve one success toward opening a lock that requires more than one success. You leave behind damage that indicates the lock was picked on close scrutiny.
Critical Failure You break your toolkit and leave behind obvious damage. Fixing a broken toolkit requires using Crafting to Repair it or else swapping in replacement picks (costing 3 sp, or 3 gp for an infiltrator thieves' toolkit).

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I’ve never played DND. I’ve only know it through memes. 😔 I tried to put the gist of what I understood.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 29 points 1 week ago (9 children)

And what action would you like to take?

[–] notabot@piefed.social 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Long lasting general strikes and boycots would be an effective tool. I realize they would be painful, or even impossible, for people to support themselves through in many cases, whuch is why things like mutual aid and strike funds need to be set up first.

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If the film/tv industry did this alone everything would collapse pretty fast. Cut off everyone's entertainment and they'll get pissed real fast.

[–] notabot@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're using 'Bread and circuses' to pacify, so remove the circuses and watch the anger boil up.

[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

They're doing a job of removing the bread already - huge benefit cuts from the most vulnerable among us

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

You do have a point, media helps keep the cattle calm and distracted...

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You mean like when there was a writer's strike and basically nothing happened and basically nothing changed?

[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

maybe more like when they took away social media in nepal and they burned that fucker down

[–] Mora@pawb.social 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

A couple of days ago someone brought the right tools to the debate😉

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That really changed things didnt it. Except no... It didnt.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

i don’t know, i feel much better, and those in power now hire more security and canceled plans, which is a good indication they are scared. also talk of assassination is getting normalized. the tone has defenatly changed

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

We just need to keep winning debates..

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

One of them dies and the rest of us are dealing with the consequences.
.
Look up 'pyrrhic victory.'

[–] Mora@pawb.social 18 points 1 week ago

So why would you stop at one?

[–] Infinite@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

edited. Thank you.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Because the rest of you didn’t get up and continue the fight.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Oh no, don't give the nazi regime pretense for the things they already did and already were planning to do! That would be horrible!

[–] thaklor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Like bringing a sucker punch to a gun fight.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Protests, Marches, call for General Strike, Civil Disobedience, etc etc etc

Trumptard may not care about your opinion but he would have to care if the country stops working...

And yes, I know it's hard... but this is what you get after decades of apathy and "fuck you, got mine"... you don't like it? you are certainly going to hate living the rest of your life under fascism

[–] sixty@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Use the guns for what they were meant for

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)