1312
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

I find it interesting that during the mortgage crisis, banks couldn’t wait to unload the housing they were left with at fire sale prices, and now investment firms are overpaying to monopolize the housing supply.

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It certainly doesn't help that it's literally illegal to build enough housing across the vast majority of urban land (at least in the US and Canada). Nothing like good ol' fashioned manufactured scarcity to guarantee line keeps on going up.

It's the mother of all regulatory capture, where our local governments (who are supposed to represent the needs of the people) have passed so many frickin laws to systematically manufacture and maintain the artificial scarcity of housing that keeps these ghouls' investments so wildly profitable. Restrictive zoning that makes townhouses and duplexes literally illegal? Check. Arbitrary and pseudoscientific parking minimums? Check. Setback requirements so everyone is legally required to have a massive resource-consuming, space-wasting front lawn whether they want it or not? Check.

Utter insanity.

[-] CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago

Yes! It's also refreshing to see you mention parking minimums. It's like everyone is blind to the sheer amount of parking lots everywhere taking up so much space.

[-] neanderthal@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Parking lots that are only close to full on Black Friday and Christmas Eve.

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

And that's by design. Parking minimum laws were literally written with maximum demand in mind, not typical. Like, those parking lots are going to sit half-empty for 99% of the year, and we all collectively have to pay for it every day through pricier goods in stores (parking lots and the real estate they occupy ain't free), pricier rent (it could have been housing instead), and pricier transportation (ginormous parking lots just spread everything out, meaning we're forced to become more dependent on gas-guzzling cars instead of being able to walk to the shop for free).

[-] Resonosity@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

In my experience as an electrical engineer, this kind of thinking, 99% non-maximum and 1% maximum, is how electrical infrastructure is built too. Conductors and transformers and other equipment are sized to the historical max + a safety factor so that the electrical system will work even on the rainiest of rainy days. It has to do with reliability and resilience.

But parking lots don't need to be super reliable or resilient... Bridges and buildings definitely, but roads and lots literally just cover land. You don't have the same risk as your do with structures or the grid. Most get repaved every few years anyways.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

In my experience as an electrical engineer I size things like that and everyone fucking argues with me. I even have a document for it that basically says

"Please sign that you have been informed that what you are doing will cause a fire and you were informed of that fact by email"

And then announce that I am not proceeding until the document is signed. So far no one has taken me up on it.

[-] creditCrazy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Not to mention how with store fronts you don't even really need pavement gravel when used gets the job done and it lets rain water drain away through it and when the place goes bankrupt the lot slowly becomes a park back in my home state of Vermont there's a lot of places that have simple dirt parking lots

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Yep. And the lower density that more parking creates means our cities are an empty wasteland of endless paving.

[-] neanderthal@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You are my people.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 26 points 1 year ago

A friend of mine wants to build a small house on land he legally owns, but he's forbidden by municipality law unless it's a luxury home.

It's dumb. He owns the property, but he doesn't have the money to build a luxury house. Why can't he build a small house?

I guess not dedicating your life to pay off your house is illegal.

[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

land he legally owns

Well the thing is he doesn't really own it. He owns the right to use it, and that right is extremely limited. You really can't say you own land when:

  1. Men with guns will kick you off the land if you stop paying your ~~rent~~ property taxes.
  2. The rights you do have over the land can be removed if the community decides they have a better use for it.
  3. Someone else might own the rights to resources on the land like minerals, oil, or water.
  4. Any substantial improvements or change of use must be approved by the local government.
[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

The crazy thing about the whole situation is it's like the ONE time that the solution is actually deregulation and stronger property rights, but it's also the ONE time libertarians WANT heavy regulations, weak property rights, and big daddy government interfering in your personal life.

I feel like I'm in bizarro world.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

A libertarian is just a Republican trying to sleep with a Democrat. Once you understand that everything they do makes sense.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Then you aren't a libertarian.

[-] Fosheze@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

What makes a luxury home different from any other home?

[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

A backsplash in the kitchen made out of those linear tiles in shades of grey, or at least that's what all the house flippers of the last few years seem to think.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago

Minimum dollar value for the house.

[-] creditCrazy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So basically the only way you can legally make more houses is if you're looking to make a company town like it's 1900

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Higher taxes I imagine. Government only has so much land to get money from so they want the most money per unit. You might say "well why not put an apartment building there?". Which should mean even more money but each person there is a certain cost. So even if you make more money per unit you spend more. The ideal, from the POV of the government, would be the town having no residents only businesses. Plus you know only poor people young people and non-whites live in apartment buildings and Karen on the zoning board has strong opinions on those types.

Basically bigotry and incentives.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Because your friend has a zoning board and they don't vote.

[-] STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Imagine legally forcing everyone's house to look the same. Seriously lawn laws in are so bonkers yet nobody bat's an eye at them.

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

True Freedom™ is when the government forces every single person to have identical, ugly-ass front lawns for completely arbitrary aesthetic reasons, clearly /s

[-] creditCrazy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It honestly amazes me how Americans warship freedom while they don't use it at all and shame people for being free

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I honestly think many people don't really know what freedom means. They think it's a one-way street that means they can get whatever they want, but they never consider that freedom means other people can do what they want, too.

[-] RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I honestly think many people don’t really know what freedom means.

I can't find it right now, but this reminds me of a tweet that said something like, "Americans think freedom means the ability to choose from between 8 different types of salad dressing instead of like, the ability to leave your job without losing your healthcare."

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Except this is because of zoning and zoning exists because of racism.

this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
1312 points (97.6% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9773 readers
199 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS