1303
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BB69@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Hillary has done a lot for the modern Democratic Party.

You know she was one of the first advocates for universal healthcare, right?

The hate for Hillary is the result of a propaganda campaign launched when she was First Lady of Arkansas.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

You know she was one of the first advocates for universal healthcare, right?

I've never even heard that, which is surprising considering she's ran for president multiple times... Can you provide a link so I can look into that?

The hate for Hillary is the result of a propaganda campaign launched when she was First Lady of Arkansas

Claiming anyone that doesn't like her fell for propaganda doesn't make sense... Pick the best person in the world, someone has a valid reason not to like them.

Clinton has zero charisma and has strong political views that progressives, moderates, and conservatives all hate.

I mean hell, if what you just said about universal healthcare is true, that's enough for lots of Dems and almost all Republicans to not like her...

Unfortunately lots of Dem voters keep electing Dems that don't want to fight for that.

[-] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Hillary is abrasive. As you say, zero political charisma. But she is also married to Bill, and he is as smooth a politician as has ever existed. He bleeds charisma. He plays the sexy sax, for goodness sake! The contrast does her no favors. Bill's cheating hurt her politically, as does the fact that they are rarely seen together. It appears that their marriage is loveless and entirely political, which adds to her image as an angry shrew.

And before anyone accuses me of a double-standard, the same would be true for a man. Americans would not elect for President an angry shrew of a man who was publicly cuckolded by his sexy, confident, charismatic wife, either. Obviously, that isn't right or fair, but there you have it. Politics has a certain high school popularity contest flavour to it.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I’d add one thing though. It’s not that Hillary lacks charisma, it’s that hers is of an interpersonal sort. She can negotiate like nobody’s business, and even her enemies speak positively of her as a person if they’ve spent any time dealing with her. But put her in front of a crowd and she’s just terrible at it. She was never going to be president but holy hell would she have made a good president Pro tempore. Heck she’d’ve been great at the job of president she just can’t do the whole getting elected president thing.

And I’d say that dissonance between her charismas really contributes with her ambition to the rumors. Very few people will see her behind closed doors where she shines, they just see someone who struggles to be likable on stage (and yes misogyny and perception play roles here too, but let’s be honest, she’s neither Obama on stage) but then she gets shit done, and makes concessions sure, but that’s part of the job. It’s easy for bad actors to say she’s threatening people instead of just extremely good with a handful of people at a time.

[-] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

That's a great point.

[-] BB69@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_health_care_plan_of_1993

It was called Hillarycare by republicans. Pharma and insurance companies lobbied against it and attacked the person in charge… Hillary Clinton.

I highly recommend you watch the documentary on her that’s on Hulu. Even if you ignore what she says, just look at the attacks that were made on her over the decades. You might find a degree of appreciation.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Thanks for the link!

It was exactly what I thought it was, just forcing everyone to be on a plan not a true single payer program.

Also, that link isn't clear on her involvement...

Appparently one of the people involved says Hilary didn't really do anything? She lied and claimed it was her to shield Bill from the political consequences of it failing?

In September 2007, former Clinton Administration senior health policy advisor Paul Starr published an article, "The Hillarycare Mythology",[39] and he wrote that Bill, not Hillary, Clinton, was the driving force behind the plan at all stages of its origination and development; the task force headed by her quickly became useless and was not the primary force behind formulating the proposed policy; and "[n]ot only did the fiction of Hillary's personal responsibility for the health plan fail to protect the president at the time, it has also now come back to haunt her in her own quest for the presidency."[39]

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

Really, it's difficult to think of any other US politician that has been constantly dragged through the mud for nearly as long as Hillary Clinton. 30+ years of non-stop propaganda... And she still almost beat Trump.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

And she still almost beat Trump.

That's a weird thing to brag about considering she helped him win the primary because her team thought he was the easiest R to beat...

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/hillary-clinton-2016-donald-trump-214428/

She's just always been out of touch with the American voter, and either she had no idea what she was doing, or knew the risk and gambled with the country for personal gain.

Shit like that is why people don't like her. She cares more about personal power than the country.

[-] BB69@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

What personal gain and power? Sounds like you’ve been drinking that right wing kool aid about Hillary being the literal devil

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

What personal gain and power?

Going down in history forever as the first female US president... Like, you do realize president of the US is a big deal right?

And there's nothing that makes moderate Dems sound more like trumpets than claiming any criticism is "fake news propaganda".

Like, if you can't objectively look at Hilary Clinton and understand some people have valid reasons not to like her....

[-] BB69@lemmy.world -5 points 11 months ago

… So being the right person for a job is a bad thing simply because you’d be the first? Come on.

You haven’t even laid out any valid criticism.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Mate, the first qualification for elected office is getting people to vote for you...

Hillary was so scared of Jeb Bush (a terrible candidate in his own right) that her campaign pumped up lunatics like trump and Ben Carson because they thought she had a chance at beating them.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/hillary-clinton-2016-donald-trump-214428/

She succeeded at getting trump into the general, but then couldn't even beat him.

So how is she "the right person for the job" when the only chance she had to be president was helping a fucking lunatic make it to the general against her... And then losing to that lunatic

America would have been better off if Hillary had stayed home and we had either Bernie or Jeb Bush as president from 2016-2020 rather than trump.

I don't know why you disagree

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What "personal power"?

This woman is literally no longer a person in your eyes. You people have invented this super-villain that just doesn't exist. Come back to reality.

Edit: I'm not even a fan of Hillary Clinton, I've just observed this happen in front of my eyes for decades and it's wild.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

What “personal power”?

I really thought it was obvious, but you're the second to ask...

Being President of the United States of America...

I guess I overestimated people on a politics sub, but I really didn't think I needed elaborate that being a world leader also makes someone personally powerful...

Or that being the first woman to hold that office would make someone remembered for the future of our country. Kids would be learning her name 200 years from now assuming the country still exists. Now at best she'll be a footnote for a decade, likely only mentioned as the person who lost to trump.

I'd feel bad if she also wasn't the main reason Trump was even in the general to begin with

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago

You realize she lost, and will never hold public office again, right?

I'm talking about currently. People acting like she's some kind of puppet master behind the scenes pulling the strings.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

propaganda campaign

Some might call it a... vast right-wing conspiracy.

[-] macabrett@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

The propaganda campaign made her seek out Henry Kissinger's endorsement, it's not her fault.

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
1303 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19080 readers
3559 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS