560
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

of course a republican and a democrat wouldnt get along. they have completely different ideals.

say it. i dare you.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 49 points 9 months ago

I'll dare. This is just like Trump's RHINO garbage. Not pure enough for you?

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 58 points 9 months ago

alrighty. I've watched the democrats sit on their thumbs and do fuck-all for over 40 years. that is the definition of conservative if you remove the fascist parts, which are wholly republican.

they trimmed a conservative love letter to insurance companies by mitt called 'obamacare' and called it a huge win while spending trillions policing the world and telling americans what they can do to their bodies.

current democrats are yesterdays republicans. and pelosi? what a conservative cunt.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You have said the actual truth.

Democrats should be viewed as an enemy of progressives ... because they ARE. They constantly hamstring progress and constantly capitulate to Republicans. They are nothing but an excuse for normies to ignore the rise of fascism. The fact they sometimes slow Republicans down is nothing but the coincidence of having someone who doesn't vote ENTIRELY in lockstep with the Republicans.

Progressives like AOC being in the Democrat party is nothing but a consequence of our shitty two-party system. I'm positive neither of those fucking ghoul parties would be in power if we had a proper voting system.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Democrats should be viewed as an enemy of progressives … because they ARE. They constantly hamstring progress and constantly capitulate to Republicans. They are nothing but an excuse for normies to ignore the rise of fascism.

They're literally white moderates.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

The fact you're being downvoted shows there is a depressing number of moderates in the crowd.

Good job, people. Prove you're incapable of learning from history.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Isn't democracy literally set up for the moderates to rule?

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No, not democracy itself. That takes many, many forms, and ours (the US, anyways) is an extremely skewed representative democracy where the people themselves don't even pick two entire branches of government.

When 2/3rds of the government isn't exactly democratic, I think it's unfair to use it as the paragon of democratic ideals.

Especially when our two-party system guarantees the options won't be very representative, either.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Maybe I asked the wrong question so let me try again.

Are you surprised the majority of people are moderates?

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No, but then I'm familiar with the ignorant mindset and the gaslighting since I grew up in a conservative family and had to reason my way to the left, and now I have my head above those clouds.

I just wish people would listen when they're told the view is so much better above the clouds, but some people don't even want to look at reality, let alone consider it.

[-] Jessvj93@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

Because neoliberals always sell us out to corporations. They're moderate Republicans fiscally when it comes to helping the public.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

I think you need some education. Review this woman's career and ask yourself honestly how conservative she seems. If what you read on the following page sounds like a conservative to you, I think your definitions are skewed as fuck.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Pelosi

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

How many times over those 40 years did Democrats have a supermajority in the Senate, a majority in the House, and the presidency?

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 22 points 9 months ago

I'd argue it's fair in both cases.

The two parties are big tent parties, often hosting people with disparate opinions on the same issues. The Squad is as Democratic as Pelosi...even though the latter uncritically supports Israeli genocide.

Similarly, the House Freedom Caucus is as Republican as Mitt Romney, even though the latter want to invade Mexico "to stop drug cartels".

That's kinda the whole problem with the Republican and Democrat parties: they take a bunch of nuanced political views and then basically turn it into a yes/no poll. I intend to vote for Joe Biden again, but I'm more AOC than Pelosi. I'm 100% certain that there's a conservative out there that will vote for Trump again that's more Mitt Romney than Jim Jordan. And I don't really think that's a flaw of people, but of the political system itself.

[-] rbhfd@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I'm as pragmatic as they get and always trying to understand why people vote the way they do. But if you're a "moderate republican" and think Trump is still better than Biden/Pelosi, you're out of touch with reality, brainwashed, or not as moderate as you think.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

It's definitely a flaw of both.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Thank you, this is exactly what @originalucifer is exhibiting. They ignore all of what Pelosi has fought for over the years, simply because she's not as far left as they are. And then they categorize anyone not as far left as them as a conservative/Republican. It's an us-vs-them purity test, designed to sow division, not guild a coalition against actual conservatives/Republicans.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Pelosi was speaking FOR universal healthcare back in the 90s. By the time the ACA was up, she was pushing back against it.

Her words DO NOT match her actions. She is not an honorable person, and anyone who honors her is a brainwashed moron.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago

She didn't fight for shit. When her party had majorities, it frittered away concessions and suddenly "couldn't whip the votes" because "blue dogs"

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Please seek help for your neurological disease.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago

Tell me about the time she defunded the Iraq War

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

So Trump is a Real Human In Name Only?

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

An Oompa Loompa disguised as a human.

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

An Oompa Loompa with Rhonda Sand Tits 4 inch boot lifts.

[-] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago

To be fair, you should’ve said Liberal vs Conservative, but yeah.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 9 months ago

yeah, i can see that. im a bit bitter after so many decades of inactivity.

this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
560 points (97.5% liked)

politics

18898 readers
3317 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS