768
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, it claimed to be removing the judiciary from the abortion debate. In reality, it simply gave the courts a macabre new task: deciding how far states can push a patient toward death before allowing her to undergo an emergency abortion.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit offered its own answer, declaring that Texas may prohibit hospitals from providing “stabilizing treatment” to pregnant patients by performing an abortion—withholding the procedure until their condition deteriorates to the point of grievous injury or near-certain death.

The ruling proves what we already know: Roe’s demise has transformed the judiciary into a kind of death panel that holds the power to elevate the potential life of a fetus over the actual life of a patient.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wagoner@infosec.pub 64 points 10 months ago

Biden and Trump are the same, and the country is worse off now than in 2020? You are clinically insane.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago

They're not the same.

A good analogy tho is skydiving instructers, you know when you first go and they have to strap someone to your back?

Republicans are suicidal instructors, who won't pull the parachute no matter what. They're going to divebomb into the ground and take us with them.

However some Democrats like Biden believe the only right time to pull the chute is at the absolute last second. To them pulling it a second early is just as bad as a second too late. They have a very specific point where it's ok to open the chute.

So while they may not be intending to kill us, if anything causes the tiniest delay...

The result is the same. We smash into the ground and die.

Which isn't as bad until we get to the point where any reasonable person would understand even if Republicans aren't strapped to our backs, they're going to do everything they can to interrupt Biden from pulling the chute.

You could argue that means the bad result isn't Biden faults, but that doesn't mean we can't be mad that he's still waiting for the last second to open the chute instead of just doing it as soon as he can.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

The result is the same. We smash into the ground and die.

The economy has vastly improved.

We aren't sucking up to Putin.

Queer people are not as scared and us parents of them are not as scared (although scared of what could happen this year).

The result is not the same.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago

The economy has vastly improved

Meh...

The wealthy are wealthier, everyone else is worse off.

And those economy gains are mostly from record breaking fossil fuels, and if you haven't noticed, the climate isn't exactly doing great.

In that example Biden isn't failing to pull the chute, he strapped on a jet pack and hit the gas pointing straight at the ground.

Queer people are not as scared and us parents of them are not as scared (although scared of what could happen this year).

Have you ever even talked to someone who is transgendered? Shit isn't exactly going great for that demographic.

Hell, even just for women. Abortion is kind of a big deal. Biden could" have used those two years to codify abortion, instead he did absolutely nothing.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Meh…

The wealthy are wealthier, everyone else is worse off.

No. Everyone is not worse off. That's simply false. The economy was in free-fall when Trump left office and unemployment was sky-high. Yes, prices are higher now and that is not good, but people can now afford to pay for food because they have jobs.

And those economy gains are mostly from record breaking fossil fuels, and if you haven’t noticed, the climate isn’t exactly doing great.

Okay? That would have been the case regardless.

Have you ever even talked to someone who is transgendered? Shit isn’t exactly going great for that demographic.

Yes I have, and it was much worse under Trump.

https://www.hrc.org/news/the-list-of-trumps-unprecedented-steps-for-the-lgbtq-community

Biden could" have used those two years to codify abortion

How? Exactly how could he have achieved this? Please detail it.

[-] june@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Hey, I’m trans, and I feel much safer right now than under trump. And I am very anxious about a second term for trump. Biden doesn’t want me dead and neither do his supporters.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 7 points 10 months ago

I think Biden would be the instructor that pulls the shoot exactly as soon as he can, keeping you safe, but killing all of your fun and wasting your jump in the process. Trump would put you both in the ground and needs another instructor to save you both, after which Trump fires the other instructor and calls him a "very bad person" and has his family tormented for ages.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

For that to be true....

I'd think Biden would have had plans to put in motion the day he assumed office and Dems had all the power.

Instead once in office he said he needed to "research" things he'd promise that he'd do.

And that "research" coincidentally took just long enough for Republicans to control the House, at which point Biden said he couldn't do anything.

Which sounds a lot like not pulling the chute until the last second, and getting interrupted and causing us to crash I to the ground.

If hed pulled it asap, that would have been his first two years when Dems had all the political power.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Nah, Biden is absolutely not the sort to pull it asap in this analogy. Pulling the chord is implementing effective regulation and actually slowing the descent.

What part of doing literally nothing on several major fronts is, "pulling it asap"?

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

doing literally nothing

In case, like me, you weren't sure if this person was arguing in good faith.

this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
768 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3164 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS