1799
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 89 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Just ignore the 150M a year they spend managing finances, contributors, tech, moderation, etc. Takes a lot to maintain an accurate library.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 71 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

i dont think anyone is ignoring that. the meme is talking about how it was built, not how it's currently maintained. it definitely didn't start off spending that much. all that spending is a consequence of it's popularity, not the reason for it.

[-] NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Some would say that most of the spending is based on greed. Individual salaries doubled to tripled in the last decade, with their head earning three quarters of a million now.

It was a tenth 15 years ago.

They started out right, like they all do. Then personal money catches up.

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I wanted to fact check you on this, and you speak true.

https://meta.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_salaries

Makes me question my willingness to donate money to them.

[-] dariusj18@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

I think you should consider the opportunity cost of what they would be making elsewhere. Salaries need to be competitive, otherwise you are at the mercy of those who are willing to work for less and hope that the reason is benevolent.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That would make more sense if Wikipedia was a profit generating enterprise that needed to satisfy shareholders. It’s run like a charity through donations, though.

Fifteen other people sit on the board of trustees that oversees wikimedia. The only person on that board who gets paid is Jimmy.

[-] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev -4 points 8 months ago

I don't buy that argument at all, it just doesn't make any sense for a position like Wikipedia. Sure, if you're in a highly competitive and specialised industry where connections and insider information matters I would get it, but just running a "simple" organisation like Wikipedia, no way.

[-] dariusj18@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

You think $750k for a CEO of a "simple" company is high?

[-] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago

Yes? And by simple I meant in the manner that it's not a competitive company. They aren't there to bring in the AI revolution or invent the next iPhone. Their primary goal is to just keep the servers running, not create record profits for shareholders.

High six figure salaries in general seems foreign to me. A core part of the nordic model is to limit wage gap between high education jobs and low education jobs, so the entire CEO wage structure in the US seems completely backwards.

[-] dariusj18@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

It may seem foreign, but it is the state of things. $750k/yr for a $100mil non-profit CEO is about average.

[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

You thinking a $750,000 salary for the CEO of one of the top ten visited websites in the world and arguably one of the most important knowledge resources we've probably ever created is 'greed' is pretty hilarious.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Thinking one guy deserves that much salary for the work of millions of volunteers over decades is what’s hilarious. Do you think those giant pleas that they post when they need money would be as convincing if they listed his salary?

[-] dr_lobotomy@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 8 months ago

What does that have to do with Wikipedia specifically?This isn't a problem of wikipedia it's a problem of capitalism

[-] gwildors_gill_slits@lemmy.ca 34 points 8 months ago

150m a year doesn't seem that much, honestly. I know people think "oh, it's just a website" but it takes a lot of work and money in salaries and infrastructure hosting to keep a web application as popular as Wikipedia up and running.

[-] nik9000@programming.dev 55 points 8 months ago

I used to work for them. It was weird and wonderful and I miss it and I don't. Lots of mission driven folks working hard to keep things going getting very little respect. But a lot of respect. But sometimes none.

Iirc a lot of their budget is spent doing charity stuff. Encouraging contributions for tiny languages. Trying not to cave to Russia or the US or France. Trying to make it less of a boys club. Trying to get local organizations going.

I remember once they sent an email that said "if the French government asks you to delete this page please just delete it. It's not worth going to jail. Someone outside of France will revert the delete."

I wasn't qualified for the work. No one was. But it was honest work.

[-] lledrtx@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Thank you for your work, though!

Very curious about the page French govt wanted deleted.

[-] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

Curious to read more about that but I can't seem to find a source for it. Do you have one?

Certainly, here are some notable instances involving French colonial forces:

  1. Algerian War of Independence (1954–1962): This was a significant and violent decolonization conflict where Algerian nationalists sought independence from French colonial rule. The French military's efforts to suppress the independence movement resulted in large numbers of casualties, including civilians. Tactics such as the use of torture, mass executions, and the creation of internment camps were reported. The exact number of Algerian casualties is disputed, but estimates suggest that the death toll could be in the range of hundreds of thousands.

  2. The Madagascar Uprising (1947): In Madagascar, a nationalist uprising against French colonial rule was met with severe repression. French forces were accused of committing numerous atrocities in their effort to suppress the rebellion, including summary executions, village burnings, and torture. Estimates of the Malagasy deaths vary widely, with some suggesting that the number could be as high as 100,000.

  3. Indochina War (1946–1954): This conflict in French Indochina, which includes modern-day Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia, was fought between French colonial forces and the Viet Minh, led by Ho Chi Minh, who sought independence. The war was marked by guerrilla warfare and significant civilian casualties, with both sides accused of atrocities. The use of forced labor, internment camps, and the bombing of civilian areas contributed to a high death toll.

These examples reflect the complex and often brutal nature of colonial rule and the struggle for independence. They involve a wide range of actions and policies implemented by French military and colonial authorities, which led to significant loss of life and suffering among the colonized populations.

[-] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Crazy shit! And they tried to get that stuff taken down from Wikipedia?

That's a question for the Wikipedia folks. An interesting one definitely

[-] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

I would call them up but I haven't paid the phone bill.

[-] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

The world should know that the french were monsters a while back. I hope they are not asking for censorship anymore

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I guarantee that the LePen crowd is still trying to whitewash their pasts as they push their nationalistic bullshit.

[-] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

What's this 'the Pen' written in meme language?

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago

She's just a fascist, plain and simple.

[-] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

150m a year for one of the most trafficked websites on the internet is a bargin

this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
1799 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

11004 readers
2311 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS