352
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by Pips@lemmy.sdf.org to c/world@lemmy.world

UN Security Council passes resolution calling for an "immediate ceasefire" in Gaza, as US shifts position by abstaining from vote

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 88 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Passed. US Abstaining with no veto. BTW it also calls for immediate and unconditional release of hostages.

[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 72 points 7 months ago

This is a pretty big shift for the US, and it means the pressure is finally starting to really register with Biden. If the "uncommited" results in the Michigan primary were enough to get his attention, recent polling that puts him 8 points behind Trump likely changed the debate for the foreseeable future.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Biden is playing diplomatic chess. Netanyahu warned the US before the vote that Israel would not participate in a meeting if the US didn't use its veto. So, now the US didn't. BTW, Hamas launched rockets at Ashdod right before the Security Council voted confirming its status as an equal fighting party in the war before a ceasefire.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

What you mean to tell me geopolitical diplomacy is more complicated and delicate than the people screaming "genocide Joe" think it is???? Shocking.

[-] soratoyuki@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago

No. It means enough people screaming genocide Joe loudly enough had a small but tangible impact on American foreign policy.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Do you suppose that Bibi believes there are ramifications for going into Rafah now?

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

So you're saying that Biden had another motivation here: telling Netanyahu, "the US ain't nobody's bitch, and you don't tell me what to do."

[-] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Multiple polls had Biden ahead of Trump before this happened too.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago
[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 5 points 7 months ago
[-] Maeve@kbin.social 10 points 7 months ago

USA because it took this many decades to merely abstain and and not veto.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago

They've been vetoing, the proper action would have been to vote to pass.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 7 months ago

Abstaining has exactly the same effect.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago

Sends a different message though.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The best time to abstain would have been decades ago, but the second-best time is now. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good; this was a good choice.

Edit: The downvotes are hard to interpret. Do people think the US abstaining (and thus allowing the resolution to pass) was not a good choice?

[-] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

this was a good choice.

Abstention is, by definition, the refusal to make a choice. And if you are not against oppression, then you favor the status quo.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 7 months ago

That's not how it actually works, though. They knew that by not opposing it would result in the measure passing. Choosing to abstain is a choice.

this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
352 points (96.8% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2243 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS