47
submitted 7 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

There’s often no forensic evidence of rape

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

There's never any when the IDF refuses to investigate it.

And also when the IDF says they have forensic and video evidence.

But actually they come out three months later and say no jk we have no evidence.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Indeed none. That's literally what the report said. After reviewing 50 hours of video footage and 5000 photos not a single instance of sexual evidence was observed. Patten said she was there to emotionally validate people not collect evidence. Israel has blocked the UN team that has that mandate. Because there is zero evidence and israel knows it.

Here's an actual breakdown of the report.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Jfc some people are dense. What is more likely, that sexual violence occurred as it has in literally every previous attack like this in human history. Or that Hamas acted like puritans while committing terrorism?

Edit: there’s like one good point in your article (“Patten’s report functions as a distraction from genocide”), the rest is BS about not believing victims

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

If there was any evidence israel would be screaming it from the rooftops and blasting it in 4k on some HamasUnleashedDotCom website.

Desperately wanting it to be true doesn't make it true. In fact israel has turned over every single stone for evidence and found none.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I hope you never have to go through the trauma of rape while everyone screams “no evidence! People make this up all the time just to hurt men!” All over the internet. Your article literally says there were witnesses and victims shared their stories.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You can thank israel for lying about rape and using it as a tool to justify their Genocide.

Also thank israel for intentionally "not preserving" any evidence of those fictional rapes despite womens rights groups screaming for it

By the way israels earliest claims were extremely graphic and had high claims of evidence. That women had "nails driven through their vaginas by Hamas" and that there was photographic and video evidence of this.

Patten has supposedly looked at those pictures and decided that a few blurred pixels with an incredibly wild IDF imagination do not constitute evidence for that whatsoever. Just a small indication of all the "evidence" the IDF made up.

[-] sujpr@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If nobody made false rape claims, then we could trust everyone who says rape occurred.

Israel, unfortunately, has a history of lying to make their enemies look bad.

[-] sujpr@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

We're not talking about speculation.

We're talking about evidence.

Funny how you shared a link that wasn't actually evidence, and now you pivot to speculation while calling others "dense".

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Eyewitness evidence is not evidence? Do you know how many convictions don’t involve forensic evidence?

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
47 points (88.5% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2284 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS