296

EU wants to undo Brexit, a little bit, for people 18 to 30 (www.dw.com)

submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

61 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The European Commission argues it was Europe's students and young graduates who were most affected by Brexit's mobility restrictions. The UK has reportedly responded cooly to the proposal.

The European Union is trying to improve mobility between its 27 member-states and the UK, particularly for people between the ages of 18 and 30. But whether such a proposal would be welcomed by London remains to be seen.

The EU's executive arm, the European Commission, is trying to open bloc-wide talks with the UK on allowing youth from EU countries to study or work and live in Britain for up to four years, with the same arrangement for British youth.

The proposal would largely revert youth mobility to pre-Brexit times, when members of the then-28-member EU, including Britain, were allowed to work and study without visa requirements. The Commission's new plan would involve a visa, but one whose fees would not be "excessive."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] pacmondo@sh.itjust.works 84 points 5 months ago

EU, please let Canada in while you're at it. We share a border with denmark

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 months ago

Also France is just a short ferry ride away if you count St. Pierre and Miquelon .

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 3 points 5 months ago

France is already in the EU though

[-] locuester@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago

Shhhh! Some of them don’t know

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

Brazilian here, from the country that shares the largest of the borders of France...

The free movement of people have been nice, is there any chance the they would pressure Brazil into losing a bit of sovereignty and obey the EU's Constitution?

[-] Hiro8811@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

imagine all country that border EU states start joining in lol

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

No need to actually join :)

[-] Bahnd@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

You are technically correct, the best kind of correct.

[-] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 3 points 5 months ago

I'm all for it, but no weird extra right like the UK had. Also, would that perhaps be a problem with your monarchy?

[-] pacmondo@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 months ago

While the governor general (rep of the crown) technically has to sign off on laws passed, they have never in the country's history refused to sign. If they ever did, I think it might be enough for Canada to kick the "monarchy" part of the constitutional monarchy for good.

[-] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 1 points 5 months ago

Thats good then. I've heard today that he once refused the formation after an election, so they had to reelect.

I feel like Canada would actually fit into the EU, besides not being in the continent of Europe.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

As an American please let us in on it

[-] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

Why? So we can import school shootings?

[-] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

Fuck no, get rid of the guns first, you cowards

this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024

296 points (98.4% liked)

World News

38573 readers

1961 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.