755
submitted 5 months ago by shish_mish@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 145 points 5 months ago

I don’t understand how one can be a woman and carry so much hatred for your own gender.

[-] i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone 148 points 5 months ago

"I behaved the correct way, and this did not happen to me. If everyone else did the same as me, they wouldn't suffer. Since their suffering is preventable, they cannot complain and must suck it up."

"See? I'm on your side. Treat me better than you treat them, please."

Source: live in a red US state and have talked to a few conservative women and minorities

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 66 points 5 months ago

You're forgetting the ones who had abortions, but 30 years later regret it because they imagine it would have made their life better if they had the kid.

They think they're "saving" the next generation, when really they have no idea what their lives would have been like if they had their own kid.

Kids are a huge change in lifestyle, and they're just think of.missed positives and not the missed negatives.

It's just how our brains work. Same as with the lockdown curbing how bad COVID was, because we avoided the worst negatives, people think they werent a possible result. And just look back at the potential positives they could have experienced.

They're obviously not right. But that line of thinking is pretty normal.

If we want to fix the problem, we need to properly identify what's causing it.

Lots of time it's just our brains working exactly as they evolved to work.

[-] i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 5 months ago

Oof I forget about these. Or just the plain hypocrites that publicly shame abortion but will secretly get one (or have their partner get one) and go right back to shaming abortion. Or substitute any other thing they have a moral objection to, really.

Their own situation called for it, and it is fine because they are "right." But those other people, it is not fine because they are "wrong."

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 16 points 5 months ago

Sure but I mean… Wouldn’t you want to try to make the world a better place in general? Why do we have to force some people into a suffering underclass?

[-] SolarTapestryofNoise@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago

Cause sky daddy "told" them to.

Don't you dare point out that sky daddy's son said the opposite and hung out with whores, poors, and the sick with sores.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

whores, poors, and the sick with sores

Is an excellent !fakebandnames@lemmy.world

[-] SolarTapestryofNoise@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

But what genre? My money would be on either garage Ska-punk or folksey Americana

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think punk is right on and also bluegrass

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

When one person stands up by themselves or with only a small group around them, the powers that be drop the hammer on them and everyone who was sympathetic and might have supported them gets scared back into line

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 months ago

That's the thing: they think that it is better. They think the reason these people are suffering is because they aren't doing things the right way.

If 9 year old girls could hold an aspirin between their legs, they wouldn't get pregnant. They are sluts so naturally they should give birth because that will make it better.

These people have zero empathy as to the real world challenges that women face. When you ask conservatives why they don't adopt, they say "I have my own children" which tells you everything you need to know: adopted children are not really theirs.

It's not about children. It's about punishment. That 9 year old needs to be punished for having sex.

It's maddening how far they have gotten in the political world.

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

If 9 year old girls could hold an aspirin between their legs, they wouldn't get pregnant. They are sluts so naturally they should give birth because that will make it better.

This is the craziest thing to me. Babies as punishment for "moral failing."

A baby is not and should never be a punishment. Anyone who thinks a baby is a punishment shouldn't be having babies or forcing others to have babies.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 months ago

I think, at the surface, conservatives don't say this. They say a child is a blessing, etc.

But when you get down deeper, past their rhetoric, they definitely equate babies as a punishment.

[-] i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 5 months ago

"I suffered, and so should you. Stop complaining!"

It really does come down to this for a lot of folks. Anyone that tries to fix it are considered "whiners" to these folks.

[-] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

that's so fucking ugly, damn.

[-] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 5 months ago

Misogyny is subversive. It's capable of being internalized. It is consistent. The ideology behind it is enforced in subtle ways throughout the entirety of our lives. We become accustomed to it, expectant of it. We are trained to accept it and be tolerant of it. Misogyny can seem beneficial to certain women, and those will readily accept it and become ignorant of the consequences it has for them.

Misogyny also doesn't exist in a vacuum. It exists alongside white supremacy, xenophobia, queerphobia, ableism, classism, and other forms of social oppression. Women can identify with and ideologically support any of those systems of oppression. All of them interconnect, though. Each system is built partially on the foundations of the others. They all affect each other. Being a white supremacist doesn't make you a misogynist, but those 2 things are ideologically consistent with each other. White supremacists tend to support misogynists and vice versa.

When we realize Misogyny not simply as a singular concept on its own, but rather a socially constructed one interconnected with different systems of power - it's actually very conceivable for women to be misogynists and actively participate in the oppression of women. They are able to firstly distance themselves from the group being oppressed using logic like "I'm an oppresser, I am not oppressed." Then they are welcomed into the greater sphere of social bigotry and systems of power. White supremacists uphold patriarchal households and white mothers, for instance. Xenophobic households uphold women and mothers from their nation and who share their religion. They are upheld not as a form of empowerment but as an example by which to compare others.

I can't say exactly why this woman specifically has chosen to actively participate in the subjugation of women, but it is a predictable phenomenon and, unfortunately, part of the strategy of fascism.

[-] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This reminds me of the many stories I have heard of family gatherings; the women all prep food and cook while the men drink beers and watch sports or talk about their work. Men who tried to help their wives in the kitchen got weird looks, and women who didn't feel comfortable playing the role of tradwife got scolded and shunned.

The misogyny is ingrained in those families, so much so that the women do not recognize it and instead take pride in their 'role.' It brings them comfort to exist in a space where their contribution is both defined and 'valued,' despite the 'role' existing as a result of misogyny. Attempts to change these expectations are seen as undermining the importance of their 'roles' and thus treated like affronts to their contributions.

And so the cycle continues...

[-] RBWells@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah that doesn't fly in my household. I do all the cooking for gatherings, yes, doing as much mise en place as possible, not wrecking the kitchen but towards the end always of course there is mess. Then I make myself a drink and ask the guys to do a round of dishes/cleaning. Then we eat and then someone else does the dishes and cleans the kitchen.

So yes there are "roles" but it's more like shifts, I'm very good at cooking but a disinterested housekeeper at best so my husband handles most of the kitchen cleaning. I just try not to be an asshole and completely wreck the kitchen while cooking.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

Wave enough money under some people's noses and they'll say or do whatever you want. True with doctors as anyone else. There's a reason why famous people can get all the prescription drugs they care to.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Surely that can’t be the case for all I hope. That helps me understand one case, but roughly half the country is women. And these people are in positions that have influence.

You would think that because there’s so many more women not in these positions that we could do something about it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Sorry, I thought you were just talking about this lady. For many of them- their minds have been poisoned by religion from infancy.

this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
755 points (98.8% liked)

News

23259 readers
2707 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS