899
submitted 4 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
  • Trump and his supporters are slamming Joe Biden for quitting the race and endorsing Kamala Harris. 
  • Some members of MAGA world are bemoaning the millions of dollars spent running against Joe Biden.
  • Biden's withdrawal also means Trump is now the oldest candidate in the presidential race.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 80 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You know what I’m not seeing?

ANY of these accounts that were so relentless in their criticism of Biden and how he needed to step down because otherwise the Democrats would lose, being simply happy about this.

ALL of the tentative happiness about Harris maybe being a stronger candidate than Biden was, is coming from people who were either neutral or defending Biden before. The people who were giving a firehose of criticism to Biden and demanding that it was MANDATORY for him to step down, for the good of the Democrats and the country, have for the most part fallen silent, and a whole new grouping has arisen to give criticism to Harris and say that as good progressives they could never vote for a cop.

[-] aniki 57 points 4 months ago

I was one of them and now am elated to vote for a non-geriatric piece of shit and a woman.

[-] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 months ago

ANY of these accounts that were so relentless in their criticism of Biden and how he needed to step down because otherwise the Democrats would lose, being simply happy about this.

Really? I've seen plenty of posts like that. Stuff like "Donated to the democratic party to show this was necessary", "Finally, we can safely roast Trump for being old and senile", "I don't care who the replacement is, thank god he's out".

There are some shit-stirrers, but they seem to be the minority.

Disclaimer: I am not American, cannot vote or donate, am heavily invested in the election due to the ramifications on Ukraine.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 4 months ago

Can you link me to them?

You don’t, like, have to, but I am genuinely curious. I haven’t seen that and I am wondering if there is some segment of Lemmy that I am missing.

[-] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Just look around this comment section, and other comment sections in !news@lemmy.world and !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

As I said, there's the occasional commenter that is trying to throw shit at the democratic party generally, but by and large the majority of comments are in favour of this, and if you click through to individual users it's not hard to find users that were hoping that Biden would drop out a week ago.

[-] Coach@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

I'm happy AF.

Biden's legacy is secure. He can rest easy as the man who beat back the right-wing fascist autocracy and led the country to elect the first female president. 🤞

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Even though I agree with you I would suggest not pushing the first woman president angle. There's already plenty of dumbasses saying that she shouldn't be elected because she's a woman, including 2 of my women coworkers. One is a republican and the other a Democrat, both boomers too.

Let's just push the competent angle.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Yeah, they can't take two seconds to enjoy the victory they wanted. They have to move on to the next thing to bitch and moan about.

[-] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 28 points 4 months ago

They didn’t want Biden to step down. They wanted him running against Trump and losing.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

Pretty much. That way when Trump won, they could say "see? We told you so!"

Much more important than them or people they might care about getting marched into camps.

Exactly.

It's quite insidious.

Today I'm suddenly seeing a lot of "vote blue no matter who", which IMO is intended to stifle enthusiasm for Kamala.

If the left could unite behind a candidate we'd destroy the GOP.

[-] aniki 24 points 4 months ago

That's not true! I danced a jig when we found out. I was voting against Trump but now I am voting for Harris.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Several others are not. Including a person who has been posting anti-Biden articles in this community for months, who has now switched to anti-Harris articles.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 5 points 4 months ago

They never thought it would happen. They shot themselves in both feet with shotguns. Now they're in panic mode because they're realizing they're really fucked now.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Wasn't rabid before, but I was one of those for Biden stepping down in favor of Kamala. I just wanted a strong voice that was capable of at least countering Trump's endless spew of lies. But I have noticed those that are now bashing Kamala were also telling people not to vote for Biden.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 6 points 4 months ago

Bots gonna bot

[-] jumjummy@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They’re waiting on the next talking points from their Russian overlords. Give it a day or so and they’ll be back with some new, yet all the same, arguments.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

You know my history regarding Biden. Go on, check my history since Biden did the right thing and dropped out. I'm still posting and not so much as an unkind word about Harris. Biden did the right thing. The party did the right thing. I'm overjoyed that for the first fucking time in far too goddamned long, Democrats listened instead of digging in their heels and demanding votes, every pore reeking of entitled paternalist condescension.

You were wrong. Your shitty candidate bowed out like you didn't want him to, and just look. The party has very much gotten in line behind Kamala. The predicted chaos and infighting hasn't happened. She's had the best fundraising in US history simply by being the understudy who was present at the time and not being Biden.

The people who were giving a firehose of criticism to Biden and demanding that it was MANDATORY for him to step down, for the good of the Democrats and the country, have for the most part fallen silent

Have you considered that it's because they're finally satisfied? At least for now? Harris is a reasonable compromise candidate. Biden wasn't, and he listened to reason and bowed out. We're better for it.

a whole new grouping has arisen to give criticism to Harris and say that as good progressives they could never vote for a cop.

Democrats are a big tent. Some of us don't like genocide. Some of us don't like cops. Some of us don't like either. Harris is in a better position to distance herself from past actions than Biden was about ongoing actions.

She ran on full cannabis legalization in 2020 and was a sponsor of the Justice in Policing Act of 2020. It ain't gonna stick.

I'm glad Biden dropped out.

Are you?

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Have you considered that most if not all people were supporting Biden because they were doing what they could to save democracy? That maybe they weren’t voting for Biden, but against Trump?

Of course you have. I’ve seen people actually tell you this first-hand- only for you to rewrite their shit and spit it back out as something entirely different. Because that’s what you do.

You see, the rest of us are wiling to do whatever it takes to save those who WILL be hurt by Trump should he get elected. We’re not entitled and arrogant enough to think we have the luxury to not vote.

But that’s because we’re mature adults that understand that merely asking for something isn’t all it takes to get it. We also understand that sometimes, the choices suck, and the lesser of two evils is all you have- and that not doing something isn’t an option when you’re wanting the opposite result of nothing to happen.

Grow up.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Have you considered that most if not all people were supporting Biden because they were doing what they could to save democracy?

Now that he's dropped out and the party has enthusiastically lined up behind a better candidate, it's clear that their insistence on an octogenarian genocide supporter ran contrary to that goal, and that everyone who called for Biden to step down was absolutely right.

I'm glad Biden did the right thing. You wanted him to stay in and lose.

You see, the rest of us are wiling to do whatever it takes to save those who WILL be hurt by Trump should he get elected.

Except call for the guy who was losing to him to step the fuck aside. Now that he has, we're more likely to beat Trump. You would have preferred to lose with Bidenyahu.

But that’s because we’re mature adults that understand that merely asking for something isn’t all it takes to get it.

We got what we wanted by asking. Your shit candidate stepped down and we now have a candidate who can beat Trump. Now get in line and vote blue no matter who.

Oh yeah, and you're doing a shit job of ignoring me.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 6 points 4 months ago

Idk how this season is going to end but the writers have definitely been building toward something.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 2 points 4 months ago

Remember the end of season 1 of "Arcane", where everything looks like maybe it's gonna be okay, and then you get to see in slow motion how an unexpected spasm of violence undoes anything good that might have been building, and you know everything's gonna be bad, bad bad, going forward?

I hope I am wrong

[-] confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I am one of those accounts who wanted Biden to step aside. Not because I dislike him but because he was going to lose. Now I have hope. I've been smiling since Saturday afternoon.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

a whole new grouping has arisen to give criticism to Harris and say that as good progressives they could never vote for a cop.

I mean, in both cases people are entitled to their honest opinions. I'm going to vote for her, but I'm not happy about it. Not being happy about her her career pre-whitehouse seems fairly reasonable to me.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

"People are entitled to their honest opinions" - but that wasn't what was happening - a bunch of rightwingers posting as leftwingers were spending a lot of time trying to convince democrats not to vote. They had paragraphs to say about why Biden was terrible but could never find the same level of detail or ire about Trump, whereas someone who was genuinely leftwing would have a lot more to say about Trump than Biden by way of criticism.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

Ah right OK, I've seen those folks. I think I was reading the tone of the discussion as general frustration with anyone who was dissenting.

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 1 points 4 months ago
[-] ramirezmike@programming.dev -5 points 4 months ago

lol that's a really broad extrapolation of what, a few people you saw that happened to post something in the last day? Just boldly labeling anyone who had a criticism of Biden as a bitter troll or something?

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
899 points (97.2% liked)

News

23361 readers
3181 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS