295
submitted 5 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/usa@midwest.social
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheAuthor_13@lemm.ee 56 points 5 months ago

Honestly, at this point, he & Alito both are essentially throwing us the finger & daring anyone to really do anything about it.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

It takes congressional impeachment to bring any consequences whatsoever, right? So basically it's impossible for them to suffer anything. Of course they're throwing the middle finger.

Thomas looks like he enjoys a good cheese hamberder or twelve, so that's pretty much the only thing that will stop him.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yes, and it’s only happened once in US history. Samuel Chase was acquitted by the Senate in 1805 and continued to serve until his death.

https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures/impeachment/impeachment-chase.htm

[-] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago

Legally speaking, you are correct.

Legally speaking.

cough.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

The second amendment is legal.....

[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's open corruption, we already have bought and sold judges who flat out lied in the legislator that they would respect established precident

[-] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 26 points 5 months ago

John Roberts: “This is Fine” meme

[-] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 20 points 5 months ago

At this point, I'm assuming that that was actually counted as one of his qualifications - that back when they were vetting nominees, he got high marks in bribability.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago
[-] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Wait, wait, wait... How many ~~bribes~~ "gifts" are the other SCOTUS members getting? 'Cause I hadn't heard of any 'til now and naturally assumed it was ≈0!

[-] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

See the thing is some of these could just be like very natural things that people have to register as gifts. Like if I had to register everything I did with my friends as gifts then maybe I'd have a non-zero sum of gifts, like my friends buy me lunch and sometimes they pick me up and drive me places. Now when your friends are millionaires that's bigger. And it seems a little bit more unreasonable. That being said, there's a difference between your friends having dinner with you and people blatantly giving you money under the table in so many ways

[-] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

The government already has rules to quantify and account for that sort of thing in various contexts, such as this or (more strictly) this. Similar rules simply need to be imposed on SCOTUS.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 months ago

That we know of.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

If the other justices are aware of his behaviour (as they are now), and dont do anything about it, they're complicit.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Sotomayor's book situation isn't a bribe, it is using her position unethically to sell books. It is wrong because it is for personal gain, but it is not taking money to do other people's bidding.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

I absolutely agree with you, I thought it was a funny contrast when I added it. No one else has noticed. The worst she did was try and convince people to buy her book, lol.

[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

"We want you to betray the people you swore an oath to protect."
"What's in it for me?"
"Money, of course. First class golfing trips with all the bells and whistles. Plus the everlasting title of Uncle Tom among the peasants... I mean populace."
"I'll take it."
"Good. As expected. We knew you were weak."

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

You have to think this is just the tip of the iceberg. With Thomas alone the number of times he's "forgotten" to include something thst we learned of later means you just have to assume there's so much more. What or how much who knows? But there is no way I believe Samuel Alito has accepted 170,000 dollars in gifts over the years. Not if his asshole buddy Thomas over here is bringing it at minimum 4 million.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

He looks like he’s part of “The Klumps”

[-] clmbmb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago

Greedy pig!

this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
295 points (99.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1893 readers
801 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS