211

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16599001

“Why wouldn’t we give that a try?”

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Bye@lemmy.world 128 points 4 months ago

Can we do mandatory civil service instead

Like that would actually help people, building infrastructure, national parks, gaining skills and trades, maybe helping reduce obesity

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 54 points 4 months ago

What are you, some kind of socialist? A true patriot is happy to die for the profits of oil companies!

[-] Makhno@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

Don't forget the fruit companies!

[-] joekar1990@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

*All companies

Privatized gains & Socialized losses baby!

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

For real. Could make it either. Give people buy in so they care aboutour country and communities. Be proud of our currently decrepit infrastructure.

And for the love of... country, do not allow religious exceptions.

[-] AllYourSmurf@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

This is a great idea. How about this: After high school, you do 2 years of civil service. Then you go to college for free. After that, you do 2-4 more years of civil service, depending on how much school you do.

In the first 2 years, you grow up a bit, experience the real world, and earn a paycheck.

Next you go to college. Get a good liberal arts core and a major in your area of interest. Then spend a couple of years putting that learning to use and developing your skills.

[-] FlaminGoku@reddthat.com 8 points 4 months ago

Well thought out and makes a ton of sense. It would also instill empathetic patriotism where you love your country because you helped make it.

[-] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I always said this is the answer for offering free education. Get a job after you’re done with school and then get a few years of real world experience. Then companies get people with training and experience right out the gate

[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Nope, that is not how a dictatorship works.

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

Damn, that's a good one I haven't heard before.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 69 points 4 months ago

Coming from a Draft Dodger and Convicted Felon, this is quite ironic. Neither would be allowed into military service in the US.

[-] EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

If you dodge the draft, you can't join?

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

In theory it's up to 5 year imprisonment and 250,000 for failing to show. Dodgers must have some way around such. (Also a felony charge, the kind he can pardon if president)

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Dodging generally means disclosing a previous medical condition, or otherwise absconding from the draft. In either case, you would not be "fit to serve" as they call it.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 58 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I joined the army for no reason other than I didn't know what the fuck to do with myself. Hell I could've had a free ride to college if I'd known what I wanted to do.

So it is from the perspective of experience that I will tell you, the quality of our military will plummet when absolutely no one gives a fuck about being there. There were gung ho motherfuckers who really wanted to be in the army and they were good soldiers. Then there were those of us who were just there to fuck off. You don't want 100x as many of those. The military would just be absolute garbage.

[-] solidgrue@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

I think this is the point, as much as it is indoctrination.

It will have two effects, one of which is to water down the efficacy of the US military with a bunch of disaffected conscripts and the other to attempt a capture of the "activist" years for what will be the dominant post-Boomer voting block. It is to stamp out some of the more extreme progressive tendencies, like "let's try not suck hot shit on everything from climate to racial equality to gender equality to economic inequality."

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 3 points 4 months ago

I would hope there would be split in two groups just for this reason.

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago

There's always the good brigades and the cannon fodder.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago

Didn't he refuse to serve himself ?

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

They always make everyone else compensate for their failures.

[-] yolobrolofosholo@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

You mean private bone spurs?

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 29 points 4 months ago

The ONLY way I'd accept this is if it applied across the board to the rich and political elites. It won't, so I'm definitely not going to vote for Trump.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

Also women, I am glad the removed the selective service requirement for males to apply for FAFSA but equal rights means equal requirements for those rights.

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Equal rights equal fights

[-] ArtieShaw@fedia.io 2 points 4 months ago

I'd be !00% on board with including women in the draft. Fair is fair.

Personally - like I told the recruiter from Annapolis 30 years ago, "trust me when I say that you don't want me anywhere near your military." If I were drafted I think I could fail out of basic on my own lack of merit.

If there were other service options, I could happily do other work. For example: Math, science, or language tutoring for teens. I could have helped out a kid who actually wanted to get into Annapolis but didn't have strong enough academics.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Time to buy stock in ozempic and metformin manufacturers I guess. IIRC the average enlistment age American needs something like 6-12wk of pre-bootcamp to be in shape enough to handle bootcamp, and the military is handing metformin out like candy.

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

Seriously. I finished OSUT for 11B school and half the company didn't pass the tape test and that was in 2002. There's no fucking way its not so much worse now.

[-] WhatIsThePointAnyway@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I would never kill anyone for a government, let alone one ran by Christian extremist.

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

You'll be repairing drones.

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Most people in the armed forces never even shoot in the direction of a person, let alone kill.

I would hope to see something like 6 months basic - armed forces plus health, basic education, fitness, key life skills like how to swim. 6 months trade learning basic engineering, electronics, first aid, computer skills, followed by 12 months in standby for manpower - disaster relief, infrastructure, yes also deployments.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Sure thing Private Negative 1st Class Orange, you and your "bone spurs" first."

[-] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

*except for those with paid exemptions, I bet.

[-] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 4 months ago

Of course the draft dodger is the one forcing people to serve.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 months ago

Fortunate Son Bone Spurs

[-] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Trump fails logistics once again. Mandatory military service makes sense in smaller countries because you need a minimum number of people to make a military function. In larger countries like America, we wouldn't even know what to do with that many soldiers. On average 4 million Americans turn 18 each year. Let's assume we're only taking men, and that generously half of them find a way out of service. That's still 1 million new recruits each year. America has the third largest military in terms of manpower in the world and we have 1.4 million active duty troops. In one year we'd double the number of active troops. Now you need to pay, feed, house, arm, and train them, which all takes... more personnel!

After seeing his absolutely bungled exit from Afghanistan, I have full faith in that administration to handle that transition

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm sure they could put a couple hundred thousands to build and guard the camps inside the US

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Don't forget the walls. And then those to build the towers that will have to shoot down the drug drops that will still fly over in drones if it were cement like the great wall. Oh, and those checking for tunnels. As our expenses go up and up as we start having people constantly hunting for tunnels and our population declining and taxes be reduced on the rich.... What happens to the country?

All of this avoided by legalizing and taxing the drugs, growing them here. Easier to regulate, and it cuts the funding to the cartels allowing Mexico to stabilize better and slowly maybe south America if we partner with them on manufacturing. Inflation stabilizes there, a lot more places to live safely. Reducing immigration, while keeping immigrants coming at rates that we can set with updated policy. (That part requires the legislative branch to do their job).. actually all of it requires the legislative branch to do their job. Set age and term limits... Scrub the rust off.

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago

Trump loves freedom alright.

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

Trump World, the world's leading alternative to Disney World for nightmare enthusiasts.

[-] NoMoreLurkingToo@startrek.website 4 points 4 months ago

I hope everyone who doesn't vote for Biden gets drafted next year.

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Didnt I just see a highly downvoted post about Trump targeting people that disagreed with him? This is why we call liberals BlueMAGA

[-] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 4 months ago

Land of the free

[-] tabris@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Rishi Sunak: SNAP!

[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Stories like this reinforce my suspicion that the US deserves to be declining the way we are.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

They plan on fully funding the orphan crushing machine too.

[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Yup fuck Trump

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I say this from the bottom of my heart… Fuck Trump!!

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
211 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3806 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS