216
submitted 4 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Voting rights group warn that the measure could end up suppressing eligible voters

The Republican-controlled House of Representatives has passed a measure that mandates proof of citizenship to register to vote - which is already a requirement.

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act would require a Real ID, passport or other government identification that shows a person’s place of birth was in the United States.

According to the bill, passed on Wednesday, government-issued ID for citizens who were not born in the US would not be enough proof. They also would have to show a birth certificate or similar document to register to vote.

Democratic officials and voting rights groups have warned that, if it were to become law, the bill would prevent eligible citizens from voting.

They’ve argued that the measure has merely been used as a vessel for spreading misinformation about election laws and immigration ahead of 2024 elections.

Elon Musk had even suggested that anyone who voted against the bill should be executed for treason.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 73 points 4 months ago

Musk should be arrested for trying to influence our government with threats.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.org 27 points 4 months ago

Musk should be arrested

That's all you need.

[-] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 54 points 4 months ago

The Heritage Foundation found 24 cases involving noncitizens voting between 2003 and 2023 — when more than 600 million votes were cast in presidential elections.

This is our top priority guys! Nothing is more important than this right now!

[-] PeterLossGeorgeWall@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 months ago

To the GOP it is because those 24 cases give them a chance to block many more votes. Just get the vote out strong enough and this wont matter.

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 46 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Mall ninja musky

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 38 points 4 months ago

Democratic officials and voting rights groups have warned that, if it were to become law, the bill would prevent eligible citizens from voting.

Not bug, feature.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Next Up: new bill to criminalize murder, voting for Democrats

ETA: /s, obviously

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 37 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

place of birth was in the United States.

What about citizens whose place of birth is not in the United States? Like naturalized citizens or children born in foreign countries to American parents - soldiers, perhaps?

Late edit: hell what about places that some folks are too stupid to know are actually in the United States? Like New Mexico. And Puerto Rico.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I guess that would mean if Elon voted, he would be arrested.

So it wouldn't be all doom and gloom.

Edit: Also, Ted Cruz.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago

Seriously. This fucker wasn't even born here, why is he supporting this? I fucking hate self-entitled rich shitholes that think the ideas that even THEY push shouldn't apply to them.

Eat the rich.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Because he doesn't think the leopards will eat his face.

[-] scutiger@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

It doesn't even matter. He doesn't need a ballot to vote. His money has much more impact on the election than his vote.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 4 months ago

Fuck the rich, but also fuck Elon in particular for being a Nazi. I wouldn't know his name if he wasn't rich, but I'd still hate the kind of person he is.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Maybe add the death penalty if they have held office in the past while having been born else where and if and only if their name rhymes with ed?

[-] blackluster117@possumpat.io 13 points 4 months ago

"Fuck 'em."

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago

Monsters. How can anyone possibly believe that the "let's make it harder to vote" side are the good guys?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

They're making it harder for the right people to not vote in the eyes of Republicans.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

How can anyone possibly believe ....

Because they tell their ignorant followers that they are the good guys. Critical thinking nowhere in sight.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 20 points 4 months ago

These are the same chucklefucks that have repeatedly voted against election security bills. They don't care about improving the integrity of the voting process, they care about making it harder to vote.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

The fewer people vote, the more likely it is for Republicans to win since their base is more die-hard. And they know this.

[-] Yewb@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

This guy is surrounded by yes men that treat him like a god king his views on the world are totally distorted.

Fun fact for perspective - if you earn $100,000 per year it would take you 10000 years to be a billionaire.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 6 points 4 months ago

Since my living expenses are like $90k, let's just call it 100,000 years.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 months ago

Thank god they’ve already seen to the important things and have nothing better to than to pass shit that already exists. I’ll know that we truly live in a safe and secure democracy when they get to rounds 3, 4, 5, etc. And /s if it wasn’t blatantly obvious.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 4 months ago

To the people supporting this bullshit, nothing is more important than voter suppression.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Jeez... 90% of the new voting block in Florida will be ineligable.

Sounds like this plan might backfire on the GOP.

[-] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 4 points 4 months ago

What a bunch of fuckin' ass clowns.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I don’t understand, people already had to be US citizens to vote. Is this a distraction tactic?

Who might be barred from registering to vote under this? The naturalized and foreign birth citizens are the most likely people to have passports for ID/registration purposes. I think you already had to provide such ID in the past, so what does this change, effectively?

A poor white person who doesn’t travel will likely not have a passport, and may also not be able to locate their birth certificate in time. So again, who is this law meant to disenfranchise?

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Democratic officials and voting rights groups have warned that, if it were to become law, the bill would prevent eligible citizens from voting.

Isn't their point that they want to make these people ineligible? The cruelty is the point.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
216 points (95.8% liked)

News

23296 readers
3193 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS