246
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by kalkulat@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net

This Incredible Tool (preventing insolation) That Our Ancestors Used To Keep Cool In The Summer.

Yeah, they cost money. So does installing air-conditioning. But they use no energy ( that'd would be bad for fossil energy-producers).

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 36 points 4 months ago

Just make me a goddamned hobbit hole that has less need for temperature management.

[-] dillekant@slrpnk.net 13 points 4 months ago

So, I'm lucky enough to have built a house, and earthworks are expensive. A hobbit hole would cost as much as the house we live in, without the actual building, just the hole.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 5 points 4 months ago

I live in a garden level apartment (I think, it’s mostly underground with one exterior wall above ground for windows, set into a hill) and it’s extremely energy efficient. We do have to use dehydrators, but that can be done in very energy-efficient ways.

The apartments above us are significantly less energy efficient, so the big drawback I see is around housing density, which is probably a bigger issue than heating/cooling energy, but I don’t actually know.

[-] dillekant@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

Horses for courses. Every area is different. Some places have geothermal but also need constant heating, so a geothermal town heating system with high density makes sense. Other places are near the equator, and actually need to sink as much heat as possible year round, so separate housing with a lot of greenery to keep everything cool works better. In other places heat and cold is mild so good passive thermal design works well.

Where I live for example, it's good to prioritise air flow and thermal management, something which is significantly harder in an apartment. Having said that, during particularly cold nights, an apartment actually works better (but this is for a month in the year).

[-] heydo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I would have to blast bedrock to make a hole or buy tons of soil to bury a house lol.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 21 points 4 months ago

Is there an awning form factor that doesn't block a significant part of the view? Seems like most the examples in the video blocked a lot of the window when looking straight out.

[-] 0laura@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

he mentioned that there are ones you can easily put down when you don't need them and said that if awnings were to become a thing he's sure they'd become smartified with some iot bullshit.

[-] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Biggest issue is that movable awnings would be more fragile, and fixed awnings are ugly and permanently block light.

Not sure they're coming back anytime soon.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Retractable awnings are VERY common in many parts of Europe, and they make a huge difference. I've got one on both balconies for my apartment, mine are electric and controlled by Home Assistant, I program them according to the position of the sun. You can install an anemometer to retract them automatically and protect them from damage.

[-] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

That sounds amazing. Since I have an HA setup as well I'll see if that's an option here. We have a lot of South facing, large windows.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 4 months ago

You don't need smart motors or smart awnings, just a normal motorized awning connected to your smart switch of choice. I have bticino zigbee switches for the shutters, and shelly wifi ones for the awnings.

[-] Zwiebel@feddit.org 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[-] 0laura@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

oh thats awesome, thanks! if i ever own a house ill totally get awnings. that wont ever happen but i can dream.

[-] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 months ago

At my parents old home, I helped install a retractable one that covered the patio.

Certainly more expensive than a basic awning, but excellent utility. And handy for the times a storm/high winds are going to be coming through.

Some years later, the switch wasn't working properly, so while fixing it I use the guts of a garage door opener (another replacement, broken motor) to use the wireless remote as a second relay control for the awning. This was about 15-20 years ago, I'd bet there are more options today. Even just ones with a dry contact you can more easily wire into a system.

[-] comrade19@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

What about instead painting your entire house black which is apparently the style in Australia

[-] puppy@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Why though? Do you guys hate having a small electricity bill?

While some parts of the world are trying to have lighter coloured asphalt.

[-] gila@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago

In the parts that are actually hot, the new builds are generally off-white brick or double-brick buildings with white Colorbond roofs (an Aus brand of corrugated steel)

You do get the odd house with a dark roof, and when you go past them everyone points and laughs at how silly and uncomfortable they must be.

[-] dillekant@slrpnk.net 13 points 4 months ago

In Australia, houses just have eaves.

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Oh hey, I'm watching this one rn by coincidence lmao I just wish it was one of his longer videos

I think I want to buy some awnings

[-] callcc@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

What about some rollo blinds? We have them shut during daytime in summer in the rooms we don't use all the time. They also help sleep in the dark if that's your thing. The drawback is that they often create a weak spot wrt. Insulation.

[-] Robomekk@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago

Interior blinds are mentioned in the video: basically since they’re behind the glass the energy is still getting in and green-housing a bit. Blinds heating up is heat inside the room. Also block the view out, which awnings don’t.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 10 points 4 months ago

If I’m interpreting the other poster correctly, they might be referring to what’s known as Roll-Laden in German, and they’re outside the glass.

[-] Robomekk@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

Makes sense.

In that case better for efficiency than interior blinds, but still blocking your view out.

Would be handy for an especially hot day or week, but I wouldn’t like to have to keep my windows covered all summer.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 5 points 4 months ago

They’re actually way more convenient than that! You have a strap on the inside of the window that you can use to raise or lower the shutters as much as you like. When it’s fully closed, the light is blocked out nearly completely though.

[-] Sparhawk87@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 months ago

The video mentions exterior roller blinds as well, wasn't too in-depth but his main down points for them would be they still radiate heat close to the glass and they block all sunlight as well as airflow.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 4 points 4 months ago

As a southern European, roller blinds or shutters are necessary for survival. What most people used to AC don't realize, is that ANY light brings in heat. Roller blinds have holes in them that get closed only when you roll them down completely: if your house is somewhat cool, leaving them down with the holes open gives enough airflow while keeping most of the heat out. If you have AC, it's even better, you don't need much light to see inside.

[-] Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

Awnings are also really ugly. Installing shudders that actually work is another option

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 9 points 4 months ago
[-] clark@midwest.social 13 points 4 months ago

You heard the man.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 5 points 4 months ago

I've got roller shutters and motorized awnings. Very effective.

[-] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

No the fuck they aren't. Get your eyes checked.

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
246 points (96.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5237 readers
431 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS