452
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 134 points 3 months ago

Some attorneys say it's not practical, especially for tenants with overdue rent.

You don't say!

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 36 points 3 months ago
[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 months ago

Other attorneys are paid by landlords.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 123 points 3 months ago

more rules that only benefit rich people. slowly making being poor illegal.

totally makes sense for one of the poorest states

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 38 points 3 months ago

Disaffected poor racists and bigots will continue to reelect the people doing this to them.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 15 points 3 months ago

almost feels like victim blaming. theyre suffering under generational propaganda... completely brainwashed. how do you combat that?

[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 months ago
[-] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Which is generally why education is one of the things the rich are trying to hold control over

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 3 months ago

Duh. That's the point.

[-] freshcow@lemmy.world 51 points 3 months ago

American "justice" system at work. This really makes my blood boil to read. I hope this law is overturned, it's beyond absurd - its also malicious.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 24 points 3 months ago

“Sure, I’ll overturn it. For money.” -judge, probably

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago

Being a judge seems like a pretty great deal honestly. I could use free luxury vacations and a 10 million dollar sinecure for my SO.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 3 months ago

So evict someone living paycheck to paycheck and force them onto the street, they won't be able to afford to challenge it because they'd need to put up more money than they have, and then arrest them because homelessness is illegal.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago

And.... prison labor is profitable...

"We're bringing back slavery baby!" - JD Vance probably

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

It never left.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Fuck, when you put it like that, it almost sounds like it was planned that way. What a funny cowinky-dink.

[-] P1nkman@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

It's free labour!

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 3 months ago

Who ya gonna believe? The honest Trump-fearing landlord, or the homeless criminal?

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

The fact that people will likely worship him as a God if he wins again...

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 29 points 3 months ago

So if someone wants a cash infusion, they can evict their tenants without notice and get a years worth of rent instantly? I'm sure that won't be abused.

[-] xhieron@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Bonds are paid into court. They don't go directly into the landlord's pocket. Also nobody gets evicted without notice (and understand that notice is a term of art in this context--plenty of people get evicted without knowing about it or being actually made aware, but every state has a requirement that you have to do one of a limited number of things in order to provide notice to a tenant of an eviction).

This is a shitty law, but please don't make stuff up or draw assumptions to pretend it's worse than it actually is.

The problem this state (via the landlords' lobbying for this change) is trying to fix is the scenario in which an evicted tenant gets a sympathetic judge in a jurisdiction with a long docket backlog and basically gets to squat in the property rent-free for however long they can stretch out the litigation. If you're just now becoming familiar with the value of litigants dragging out litigation, well, welcome to 2024.

I know social media despises landlords (and there's very good reason to revile institutional real estate hoarders), but there are good public policy reasons to not want people squatting in properties rent-free, one of which is that if the landlord can't get a non-paying tenant off the property through legal means, they will pursue non-legal means instead. There are much better ways to accomplish this than the way TN has here, but shotgun evictions are something we'd really like to avoid.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

The problem this state (via the landlords' lobbying for this change) is trying to fix is the scenario in which an evicted tenant gets a sympathetic judge in a jurisdiction with a long docket backlog and basically gets to squat in the property rent-free for however long they can stretch out the litigation

Classic case of the solution being many times worse than the problem.

Also, people too poor to afford rent don't tend to be able to afford dragging out litigation either. Lawyers are expensive and even if you manage to get pro bono representation, there's likely to be limits.

if the landlord can't get a non-paying tenant off the property through legal means, they will pursue non-legal means instead.

So the solution to landlords breaking the law to get rid of poor people is to make it unaffordable for poor people to contest unfair evictions?

Sounds like landlord logic..

shotgun evictions are something we'd really like to avoid.

Then take the gun away from landlords in stead of pointing one at homeless or soon to be homeless people.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

It was never rent free. The system they got rid of said the court set a payment already. The idea that it was rent free is pure propaganda.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

Sounds reasonable, at least to the Elon Musk type of folk. After all, laws are made to accommodate the wealthy. Look at the wealthy orange felon/rapist - he is waltzing all around laws that would put you in prison for ten lifetimes.

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Why nobody wants to work anymore?

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 months ago

Do you want mass migration out of your state? Because this is how you get mass migration out of your state.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

Except for the fact that most of the people who can't afford rent can't afford to move to another state either.

Plus there's the ones who can't leave because of family or work.

If moving both yourself and who/what you need with you was free, almost nobody would live in non-Nashville Tennessee.

[-] HelluvaKick@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I love my non nashville tennessee city, and love my state. But I hate our state's legislature. And nashville honestly

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] rustyfish@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Democrats will be blamed in 3, 2, 1…

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

In saner years I'd say that the Supreme Court would never let this stand, but these days Clarence would just say "Fuck it, make it double."

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

That kind of money would get you a mortgage

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

JFC that is dystopian AF.

[-] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I live in TN ( for now ) and our Trump loving leadership is making a fine case for moving out of state.

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Shit I live in TN... well I have loud neighbors I need to shut up...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
452 points (98.7% liked)

News

23265 readers
3590 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS