166
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 103 points 3 months ago

This is so weird...

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 84 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The context is Kamala isn't smart enough to run the country. He then pans to how beautiful she is by making comparisons with his wife (misogyny, she's beautiful but dumb). He then points out how of course they look different (race).

My interpretation is, in his own misogynistic racist way, he's trying to backpadel on the racism by calling her beautiful, but ends up coming off as misogynistic and still quite racist.

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You forgot that he called her an actress

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago

Yeah, there was a lot of subtle negging happening.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

He then pans to how beautiful she is by making comparisons with his wife (misogyny, she's beautiful but dumb).

Remember, Melania got into the US on an "Einstein" visa. Trump really might believe she's intelligent and would therefore be complimenting Harris by making that comparison.

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I pulled context from the article. He called her dumb.

We need smart people, and people that have the ability to lead. She doesn’t have that ability. Can you imagine her with chairman Xi [Jinpin, President of the People’s Republic of China]

He then goes on about her looks.

I saw a picture of her on Time Magazine today. She looks like the most beautiful actress ever to live.

Essentially arguing that she faked her way into her position, coasting on her looks. This is a misogynistic view point.

Here he's drawing contrast, of course they're beautiful in there own way. But considering his history of racism and his racist base, this comes off as a dog whistle. She's beautiful but not white woman beautiful.

She looked very much like our great first lady, Melania,” Trump gushed as Musk met his comment with an awkward chuckle and a reserved, “yeah…”

She didn’t look like Camilla,” Trump said, purposely butchering Harris’ name. “Of course, she’s a beautiful woman and we’ll leave it at that.”

Leave it at that I interpret as, of course she's beautiful for a black woman. He leaves it at that as a dog whistle as he's realizing overt racism isn't helping him atm.

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

For some reason it makes me feel extra icky that he referred to her as "our great first lady...". A title she doesn't have, no matter what he dreams. instead of just "my wife Melania", or "my beautiful wife Melania". Is he into cucking or something?

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 71 points 3 months ago

Trump’s new political strategy is… gushing about his opponent’s looks and comparing her to his wife?

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 59 points 3 months ago

I guess I can see a similarity: they both don't want to sleep with Trump?

[-] scops@reddthat.com 12 points 3 months ago

People do tend to look pretty similar when they're trying to stay as far away from you as possible.

[-] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 19 points 3 months ago

Fully leaning into the weird persona and trying to creep Harris out.

[-] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 67 points 3 months ago
[-] Spitzspot 60 points 3 months ago

Creepy weird

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 35 points 3 months ago

Even far-right ghouls can't deny it. Harris is a total prosecutie.

[-] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 3 months ago

is there any chance you got this phrase from Arrested Development?

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago

Just a slight 100% chance.

[-] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 3 months ago

"I outsourced it!"

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

The headline is that Trump called Harris "beautiful", but the actual context was "the most beautiful actress". I think he was attempting to imply that she isn't qualified for the job at all, and is simply acting the part.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 months ago

This is just garden variety sexism. But it's so out of place in 2024 that people aren't going to understand it.

This guy is a fucking fossil. I bet this worked great back when he was 50, and hanging out with a bunch of other old white guys.

He was 50 back in 1996. The fucking nineties. Vote this geriatric, senile douchebag off his soap box.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 11 points 3 months ago

“She looked very much like our great first lady, Melania,” Trump gushed as Musk met his comment with an awkward chuckle and a reserved, “yeah…”

“She didn’t look like Camilla,” Trump said, purposely butchering Harris’ name. “Of course, she’s a beautiful woman and we’ll leave it at that.”

[-] ElmarsonTheThird@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 months ago

Camilla, maybe as in Princess (?) Camilla, the wife of Charles III.?

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

I’ll give him this one, Kamala Harris doesn’t look like Princess Camilla. Of course, she also doesn’t look like Melania…

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

No it was more like "Ka-MAH-la"

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago
[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 3 months ago

Why didn't he have his teeth in? I was so confused on his lisp.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Afaik he has veneers so - possibly chomped too hard on a burnt ketchup steak?

[-] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Hours after the Trump-Musk interview, the tech tycoon said that he is also willing to interview Harris ahead of the November election.

“Happy to host Kamala on an 𝕏 Spaces too,” he wrote on his social media platform.

Harris’s campaign team meanwhile responded to the interview with a scathing statement calling Trump and Musk “self-obsessed rich guys who will sell out the middle class and who cannot run a livestream in the year 2024.”

Nah, she should do it. Would love to see Musk crumble by having to talk with someone who would do anything but spin around on his dick

[-] warm@kbin.earth 41 points 3 months ago

It just bolsters him though and doesn't do much for Harris.

[-] ganksy@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

Nope. Fuck his platform. Any movement that's not away from it puts us in a worse position.

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

I don't think she should lend credence to money buying an interview

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Eeeeewwww! Creepy Don shows his ugly face again!

The only way Trump can relate to any woman (or especially a little girl) is as a fuck object.

Just the thought makes you want to go take a shower, with bleach.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

He does recommend bleach, thanks for staying thematic.

That’s how tiny hands McGee likes the scrubbin’ done.

[-] jhymesba@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

"Beautiful" is far from the first word I'd use to describe our future Madam President. "Smart". "Dedicated". "Hard-Nosed". "Driven". "Focused".

Reduce her to her looks at your peril, shitgibbon.

[-] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 months ago

I don't think she's particularly good looking, which may just be personal taste, but in any case doesn't matter in the slightest. She's not running for Miss America, she's running for President.

Not that I hold any particular love for beauty contests either, but - like Harris' looks - that's irrelevant here.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

I just can’t anymore. He’s so fucking weird and shitty and creepy.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

marking a complete U-turn from the 2020 election where he sided with President Joe Biden and the Democrats.

Bullshit. This cannot possibly be true.

[-] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 7 points 3 months ago
[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

But he's been a right wing nut job since before 2020.

[-] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Sure, but he also knew that part of Biden's plans were EV tax credits, and nothing gets Elon more interested in something than a government hand-out.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Government handouts, aka billionaire Viagra.

[-] Thorry84@feddit.nl 5 points 3 months ago

Why is there not a clip of what he said in the article? The main video is of a completely different part. None of the links in the article seem to be the clip? I'm probably just dumb and not seeing it, or is it actually not there?

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

The Independent - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Independent:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-elon-musk-melania-harris-beautiful-b2595502.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
166 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2364 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS