-45

Green Party Presidential Candidate Jill Stein Taps Historian Butch Ware as Running Mate (www.democracynow.org)

submitted 1 month ago by Emmie@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hey Jill Stein, why is completely pulling out of NATO part of your otherwise almost 100% sensible progressive platform

JILL STEIN COME BACK

ALSO WHY IS IT #2 ON CORNEL WEST’S WISHLIST, that’s super incongruous in relation to literally everything else about him, do you happen to know anything about that

COME BACK

ANSWER ME

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 26 points 1 month ago

I like how her solution to Russia/Ukraine is literally "if everyone else just leaves it will sort of solve itself". That's a direct quote.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 13 points 1 month ago

If there’s one thing that’s connected with success in a management role, it is blind cockeyed optimism combined with ignorance of the issues involved and a preference for simple one-sentence solutions. Literally never seen it go wrong, in government or war or business or anything else.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

By "everyone else leave and it will solve itself" she means "Russia will conquer Ukraine and my paymaster Putin will be happy."

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

As a manager who regularly has to clean up other manger's bullshit because of exactly that... I fucking hate other managers. Especially "project" managers.

A close second is the bean counters that keep sending me "recommendations" to fuck over our employees to save a buck to become more profitable, despite the fact that our branch (and specifically my accounts) are the most profitable nationally. (yes, even compared to accounts that take that advice...)

[-] HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world -2 points 4 weeks ago

Because Nato should have been dismantled after the Cold War?

The Warsaw Pact was dismantled. Why wasn't Nato?

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

Hey Jill Stein!

Why did you enjoy your dinner with criminals, a traitor, and a dictator who illegally invaded a sovereign nation and is currently doing a speed run on all the war crimes?

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Why do parties run candidates in their seventies or eighties and think we’ll take them seriously?

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago

Her age is beside the point. She’s basically a Russian-aligned spoiler candidate.

That’s not hyperbole. One of her primary policy positions is to withdraw the US from NATO. The only people who really want that, and also understand the full implications of that, are people who are helping Russia for one reason or another.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

That part should be obvious to everyone.

It’s just really fun pointing out how old Stein and Trump are.

[-] HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

Hmmm. I thought she was going to look for a Palestinian running mate.

I wonder if she couldn't find one.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

Democracy Now - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Democracy Now:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.democracynow.org/2024/8/19/headlines/green_party_presidential_candidate_jill_stein_taps_historian_butch_ware_as_running_mate

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024

-45 points (21.5% liked)

politics

18870 readers

2695 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News