267
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Vode_An@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Inspired by this Jon Bois video where body builders argue about the number of days in a week.

PLEASE be sure to include a link or screen cap.

Edit: thanks to 18107 for a li k to the original

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 18107@aussie.zone 100 points 1 year ago
[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 year ago

Lol, this Josh dude really thinks a week is Sunday-Sunday. So does that mean every Sunday is part of two different weeks?

Oh shit, more people join in. Does the dumb bodybuilder meme have a grain of truth?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Vode_An@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

Thank you, I should have linked the original as well.

[-] OwenEverbinde@lemmy.myserv.one 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wow. That's Linus Torvalds levels of screaming, "ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID?!"

People got really worked up back in 2008.

[-] LanyrdSkynrd@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

The best part is how the OP never admits being wrong and still gets it wrong in the last post before closing the thread

[-] MajinBlayze@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Thank you, I needed that today

[-] Tuss@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

For some reaon my IP is banned om that forum.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 98 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] DrQuint@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm quite sure the artist is winning that one. He's riling up so many people by just repeating a single phrase.

Like, anyone who thinks he's serious is really not yet fit for the Internet.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's my favorite argumentative tactic. I've been in a months long debate with youtube losers about whether one of every Pokemon would beat 1,000,000,000 (one billion) lions

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago

RIP the one guy that believed him when "corrected".

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Vode_An@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Ken M vibes

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] beckerist@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That was hilarious! I don't have an argument but reading through that reminded me of 2 older forum posts. A little off topic but here:

  1. I put on my wizard hat and robe

  2. The Bobbit Worm Chronicles

[-] Vode_An@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Haha, bloodninja was a legendary troll.

Invertebrates give me the ick, so I hope you don’t mind me not clicking that one lol.

If you enjoyed that video, many of the creators videos are hilarious.

I highly recommend the one about the highest scoring American football game of all time (it’s over 200).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] N00b22@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago

Any argument from /r/BanVideoGames is fun lol. People don't realize it's satire and it becomes the funniest part of that subreddit 😂

[-] Vode_An@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

That sounds promising. What are the odds it’s been taken over by “true believers”? That seems to be the fate of any long-running satire on Reddit. TheDonald, most infamously.

[-] N00b22@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

I think some people could think it's not satire but that's because there is a rule saying "we are not satire". Guess what? That rule is satire too

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago

There was some Wikipedia article that was subject to a really long and intense conflict over whether it should have an infobox. I don't remember the details, though.

[-] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

Most of the Wikipedia dramas are fantastic, pedantic and/or ideologically driven people fighting with other pedantic and/or ideologically driven people for pages after pages until some admin just unilaterally picks one side and locks the discussion

[-] Vode_An@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

Reminder that the multiple governments have been caught mass editing Wikipedia.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I seem to remember the "feces" Wikipedia article made it onto a list of dumbest Wikipedia controversies, because it has endless debate about the authenticity of the poop photo used and whether a different, more realistic poop should take it's place.

[-] Vode_An@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Now this is shitposting

[-] simple@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

Oh my god I was going to post the same thread, but I instead highly recommend the mega64 reenactment of the bodybuilding forum fight: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqylqmDl0Mw

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ExLisper@linux.community 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, Hydrogen vs Boost obviously.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6LKNTJN3Ug

(I didn't 'read' it but it's funny)

[-] elxeno@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] wombatula@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

I know it stretches the definition of Internet Argument, but this video never fails to make me laugh:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxdrq9DZWpU

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] legion@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

There's a reason it's called "bodybuilding" and not "brainbuilding".

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The one and only Sadam vs Hitler thread

EDIT: wait, oh god, they deleted the actual thread. Tragedy I tell you!

[-] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Will have to dig up a link to it, but the Silent Hill foreskin guy is a classic.

Edit: here's an archive of some people tweeting about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stephywephy88@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I started reading your post 14 minutes ago and read 30 seconds every other minute then watched the video (but I didn’t count those minutes) and now I’ve grown chest hair. That was some good reppin

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

A little context must go into this one. For three years now, Wix has owned DeviantArt, having acquired it from its original managers. Wix then redesigned DeviantArt to have a more modern functionality, referred to as DeviantArt Eclipse. A part of this functionality is that people on DeviantArt are (supposed to be) notified whenever someone posts a work similar to their own on any website across the internet, even on the dark web, as an originality-based precaution. As a side note, I wouldn't say DeviantArt is doing the best it has ever done, but I wouldn't call it bad, but "pessimist culture" would disagree, and there are those who say the feature I mention is irreputable.

One day, a certain someone signed up for Wix and started putting art on there instead of DeviantArt. It should be noted that you can be banned from DeviantArt but not Wix. It's not usual, but I myself demonstrate this, probably because my "ban" was circumstantial and therefore intentionally made only partial (for this reason, look up my Lemmy username on DeviantArt, I'm not forgotten), but I'm only a second person here as far as Wix is concerned. Someone deep into this "pessimist culture" (I don't know what else to call it) then noticed and made a complaint accusing me of bypassing DeviantArt's detectors using their own parent website and nobody doing anything, even "with the premium service package". I kind of laughed at this, it would be like saying you committed a bank robbery by asking to speak to the manager and then asking him nicely for all the money in the bank. You kind of have to question the ownership at that point. Needless to say the fishiest thing was the accusers.

[-] PaulSmackage@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

i dont have the links, the forums might not even exist anymore, but i remember a lot of d&d alignment arguments from the 00s that went on for days and garnered thousands of comments. no one changed their opinions and the comments were essay length because you HAD to (you didnt actually have to) always quote the previous post too.

good times marx-ok

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Years ago (early 2000s), Dilbert.com used to have a "Lazy Inventor" section of the website. "All Talk, No Funding." This was fine for a while, then someone suggested "child free days [at restaurants and stores]".

You would have thought he'd suggested clubbing baby seals. The shitstorm it generated was legendary. I'm pretty sure that was a direct contribution to them disabling that feature a few months later.

I found it in the Wayback machine! Unfortunately, it only grabbed the first few pages of comments, and the spice was only starting at that point.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
267 points (97.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43791 readers
943 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS