192
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 156 points 2 months ago

I thought he promised that during the 2016 election?

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 143 points 2 months ago

Yes he did. Trump promises a lot of things and never delivers.

[-] macarthur_park@lemmy.world 64 points 2 months ago

By not releasing the JFK files Trump maintained this crucial bit of leverage. That’s some 7-D parcheesi right there.

Or y’know, Trump just being a lying POS who doesn’t bother to remember the promises he makes.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

You fool! He's been playing N-Dimensional Yahtzee the whole time!

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago

He's the type to enjoy playing monopoly, but only when he gets to be the bank.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Keeps. His. Promises.*

*doesn't keep his promises

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago

If you deliver on your promises, they're not promises any more, but deliverables. The only way you can keep your promises is by keeping them as promises.

... Is probably what Kelly-Anne Conway would say.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] orclev@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

Sure, but the demographic he's campaigning for have a tenuous grasp on reality at best, you expect them to remember something that happened in 2016? I'm sure they've already constructed some elaborate scenario in their heads about how Trump tried to reveal the truth but a Oceans 11 worthy plot by The Deep State(tm), Bill Gates, and Barack Obama conspired to prevent its release.

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

That's not even 2-D Candy Land

[-] dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It was George Soros, not Bill Gates. Please DYOR.

Now you know.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 23 points 2 months ago

Don't worry Trump will release everything in 2 weeks, just like his healthcare plan, infrastructure plan, his taxes......

[-] hate2bme@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Not so much the Epstein files.....

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 41 points 2 months ago

I was unaware "what happened to JFK" was actually a major ask from the RFK-curious crowd. Don't they have more current conspiracy theories they want answers to?

[-] evidences@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

It's RFK Jr himself that's probably asking for it. He's said in the past he knows the CIA is behind the killing of his uncle. Says the CIA had him killed because JFK didn't provide air support for bay of pigs and it pissed the CIA off. RFK claims he has proof but no one takes him serious or something.

[-] BallsandBayonets 9 points 2 months ago

He's crazy to think the CIA is behind it. The CIA handles overseas assassinations; domestic ones are the FBI's domain.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Well in this case, JFK fired CIA Director Dulles for the Bay of Pigs debacle. You’re right about the CIA being responsible for overseas assassinations. Dulles was involved with coups and assassinations in Guatemala and Iran. However, in the case of JFK, he made an exception and facilitated a domestic assassination since the case of his firing was personal.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 months ago

If there are any sealed files remaining regarding the JFK killing, then FUCKING RELEASE THEM. honestly I don't expect much from anybody. What's Trump gonna do, show a tax return or a balance sheet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

At least the GOP and Trump are focused on things that will help move american forward. Things that help the average american tax payer. Things like making the presidency about yourself, something that's happened to you personally but more importantly helping another rich old white dude from a famous family.

Those are the kind of things I wish the Democrats spent more time on. Instead they are talking about healthcare for everyone, student debt relief, tackling price gouging, and increasing the taxes on billionaires. Seriously, wtf Harris Get a grip. I want to see the zepruder film and documents about an assisnated president that hasn't been relevant in 50 years.

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

He asked the Harris camp for a cabinet post for his endorsement. If he helps trump become a dictator he will be Secretary of Health, I guarantee it.

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 7 points 2 months ago

I would be very surprised if Trump honors the agreement. After the election is over RFK will already have served his purpose, and will have no leverage. Trump will claim they never had any deal and RFK will be left holding his dick.

[-] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 months ago

Wasn't that what happened with Chris Christie? Kushner convinced trump to go back in any deal after the election?

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 5 points 2 months ago

I believe so. Was promised the AG position if I remember right.

[-] Evrala@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Well, he'll have his money from Russia at least. I listened to his whole speech, the part about Ukraine is straight out of Russian state media talking points.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah I think that's the deal they made which is pretty low cost for Trump since he doesn't know what that secretariat does and wouldn't care if someone told him.

[-] binary45@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

I’m sure that Biden could do something really funny and just… declassify those documents.

[-] vanontom@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I swear both of them have already promised and/or done this.

Edit: Yes. Biden declassified 99% just last year. (Another thing Donnie promised, that Joe actually did. Infrastructure week!) I'm sure the final 1% will finally prove every conspiracy true... /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

I imagine experts probably advise against it because there are far reaching implications that could cause significant diplomatic or intelligence issues, domestically and internationally and that Donald "Here's Where Our Spy Satellites Are" Trump doesn't give a fuck.

[-] binary45@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Pretty sure he’s already proved that. He’s already given information on our spies to Russia, which resulted in them getting killed.

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

"Speaking at a rally in Glendale, Arizona, Trump also pledged that, if elected, he would “establish a panel of top experts” that would work with Kennedy, a prominent anti-vaccine advocate, to investigate childhood health problems."

Well if you stop vaccinations you will have a host of childhood problems, so you will never run out of things to do!

[-] 58008@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Can't have childhood problems with no living children to have them.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

wonder about polling impact on swing states, i got the feeling the reminding RFK jr enthusiasts don't plan to vote for neither party, so not much change

[-] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 21 points 2 months ago

Don't let RFKJR voters forget: Trump presided over creation of the Covid-19 vaccine.

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago

I'll feel dirty doing it, but I'll do it.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 6 points 2 months ago

It was funny to hear Trump try to take credit for this during a rally and getting booed for it. It's like one of the few genuinely good decisions he made, but he can't even use it to campaign on.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

He cannot be removed from three, Michigan, Nevada and Wisconsin. I wonder if that many will still vote for him in those to act as much of a spoiler.

[-] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

Woo did that guy promise something

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
192 points (91.7% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3239 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS