408

Donald Trump’s debate performance was far worse than even his inner circle anticipated.

While Donald Trump’s team is publicly pushing a postdebate victory lap, many in his camp were privately disappointed in the Republican candidate’s performance on Tuesday. 

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins reported Wednesday night that several Trump insiders were “stunned” by his poor performance and by just how easily he fell for all of Kamala Harris’s attempts to provoke him.

“I’m told that as soon as Donald Trump exited that debate stage, he immediately began quizzing those waiting in his viewing room about how the last 90 minutes had gone,” said Collins. “While several people praised him to his face, telling him they did a great job, that’s not what a lot of them are saying privately today.

Apparently, all that practice with members of his team, such as former Hawaii Representative Tulsi Gabbard, had ultimately amounted to very little when it came time to debate.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] StrongHorseWeakNeigh@lemmy.world 119 points 1 month ago

Considering his rapidly deteriorating mental faculties and the fact that's he's surrounded himself with yesmen; he probably really believes that he did well in that debate.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 80 points 1 month ago

A person like this does not have inner reflection the way you're imagining. I vouchsafe this fact to you: he sought external validation immediately, real and imagined, and then moved on to the next pissing contest without ever thinking genuinely about his choices leading up to that display

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago

Spot on. I've read 10,000 comments regarding Trump that miss the most basic aspect of the man: Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Everything he says or does flows from this.

I don't mean narcissist in the way most people sling the word around, I mean the actual mental illness. People slap that title on anyone selfish, lying or bullying. No, words have meaning.

No he doesn't have any sort of internal reflection. My mother suffered NPD, I can tell you all about it. She didn't have the mental space to consider, "Am I wrong?". Such thoughts were literally impossible, her brain could not work that way. In the 50-years I knew that woman I never heard her admit fault or apologize. Not once. That's pretty stunning if you think on it a few. And Trump makes mom look positively of sound mind!

Nothing the man says or does surprises me, yet people continue to be appalled. We keep trying view his thought processes through the lens of our own. Nah. That dog don't hunt.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Nmom kid here too, you're spot on. It's actually fascinating if you forget the horrors. Like for example no empathy, and not like very very very low (hi dad!) empathy, but totally devoid of it. Just 'cannot compute' level.

Hope you're doing fine btw!

I agree. Nmom kid here. I thought she didn't have a concept of "truth". To her, every statement was equally valid as long as it was useful to her. Just complete and total lack of a consistent worldview.

[-] Tyfud@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

I'm not entirely sure he doesn't stew on this.

Hitler, famously, obsessed over negative news coverage/press about him. Even to the point where he threatened violence/war with New York if they didn't redact a column about him being a wannabe dictator.

Trump is the same kind of narcissist Hitler was, and gets similarly obsessed with negative press about him.

I agree that I doubt he's reflecting on this, but he's absolutely aware the rest of the world thinks he screwed up and that's why he thinks they're lying. Because everyone else around him says he won, so how could, literally every news agency, including Fox Entertainment "news", say Kamala beat him?

But he is absolutely pissed and stewing in his own piss right now at all the negative coverage after his debate performance.

[-] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

There is one exception to the "Trump hates negative press" that I'd like to note. When Dr. Fauci was called to meet with Trump after he corrected him on live TV about drinking bleach, he found Trump in his office saying "My god these ratings are amazing, they're better than cable". Oddly enough sometimes Trump sees any news is good news so long as he's the main focus.

The times I've seen him really go off is when the news cycle stops paying attention to him.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yep.

Isn't it crazy how common it now is to understand and converse with people about the specifics of an otherwise rare personality disorder?

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago
[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

Oh yeah. That was a very nice choice of words.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

A cromulent lexical affixation.

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I'm sure he doesn't even care that people are mocking him about it, the fact that everybody is talking about "concepts of a plan" and "they're eating the cats" is still a victory in his mind. Good attention or bad attention doesn't matter, attention for the sake of attention is the only thing he cares about. Nobody is really talking about anything specific Harris said or did, she didn't really have any really breakout moments that I can recall after having watched it, it was just Trump being a jackass and saying dumb shit.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago

“Several of them told CNN they were stunned that the former president failed to do a better job executing on the talking points that he had been preparing with his team for weeks against Vice President Harris, her record, her policy reversals.”

Apparently, all that practice with members of his team, such as former Hawaii Representative Tulsi Gabbard, had ultimately amounted to very little when it came time to debate.

Oh please. If there is a trump “insider” who thinks for one hot second this demented chattering rapist can stay on message without large-type notes and a shock collar, then they're as big an idiot as they sound.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"~~We have always been at war with Eureast Asia~~ Trump will absolutely dominate the debate. "

It doesn't matter what they believe, as long as the repeat what the party wants them to say.

[-] elbucho@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's amazing to me that anybody on his team was shocked he did so poorly. It just indicates to me that they're absolutely shit at their jobs. Being a good advisor requires you to be able to recognize the difference between reality and fantasy, and anybody who thought Trump would do well in this debate after spending any amount of time actually listening to him has failed this most basic of tests.

I'm surprised that he did so well in the debate, actually. I mean, he still got absolutely bodied, but no microphones picked up the sound of him shitting himself this time, so he's already showing an improvement over his debate performance with Biden.

Edit: it just occurred to me that Trump randomly shitting himself could be the reason his team were so gung ho for muted mics: it means that there's 50% less chance he'll drop a deuce while near a hot mic. If so, that's a great strategy on their part.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

He did fine. He likely lost precisely zero votes. There was nothing for him to lose. It's not like cult members watch their cult leader in a debate and then go "oh I guess I'll leave my cult." People leaving cults often literally have to go through a process of deprogramming and copious therapy.

Harris did well, so maybe she picks up a point, but since she's lost about a point since the DNC, that makes it essentially a wash. While it was a good debate for Harris, it ends up meaning very little. All the hyperventilating about it is way outsized to the effect.

[-] Bobmighty@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

He did very poorly. His base is largely racist whites. Harris knows that very well and made sure to embarrass him in ways the base wouldn't like. Belittled him to his face as if he was nothing, and smirked at his impotent old man rage. She made trump look old and bumbling, and even conservative media is having trouble denying it.

He looked weak and it will cost him votes. Especially since his campaign is barely trying dogshit at the moment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] elbucho@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

It's really not about him losing votes, though. Despite the fact that there are a truly mind-boggling number of idiot cultists out there who are for some reason devoted to this moron, there are not enough of them to win an election. Both candidates need to appeal to the vast pool of undecided or apathetic voters in order to win. In 2020, the Democrats won because that pool of people were highly motivated to oust Trump after living through 4 years of his presidency, but people have very short memories and even shorter attention spans, and so the Dems can't really count on the same thing happening again in 2024.

When Trump was running against Biden at the beginning of this race, things were looking grim for the Democrats, because that group of morons who can't be bothered to pay the slightest bit of attention to what's happening in their government (apathetic & undecided voters) decided that they couldn't really tell the difference between two senile, doddering old men, so Trump's rambling incoherence wasn't that big of a problem. Now that he's facing someone more than 2 decades younger than him who still has the complete use of her mental faculties, it's imperative for him to do SOMETHING to make himself not look like a shoeless old man in a hospital gown wandering between lanes of traffic after escaping from his rest home. This debate didn't do that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Is it immoral to start a cult and continue to use cult tactics to steal members from another cult to deprogram them and herd them all into therapy? Asking for a friend, and 90% of our parents.

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

We need a cult of mental health.

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

-Are y'all with the cult?

-It's not a cult, it's an organisation that promotes the deprograming of-

-This is it.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

You can expect a loss and still be surprised by the extent l.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

They were no expecting much, and he managed to even wreck those low expectations.

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

…because it surprised NO ONE else…

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago

No one is surprised he did poorly, but I don't think anyone expected him to do "immigrants are eating your pets" levels of bad.

[-] Naz@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

They're eating your cats! They're eating your dogs!

They're ~~eating your babi~~ aborting your babies!

Me, making sure I'm not watching The Onion News

[-] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

I read that as absorbing your babies.

[-] auzy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

What's surprising is all the people who on Facebook are now saying it's true lol

It's literally the most absurd claim ever lol.

It's possible it happened once probably by some druggie

But it's definitely not something that happens regularly 😂

It's crazy how these people literally see immigrants as animals or a different species lol

They're just normal people

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah that’s probably true but I was not so secretly hoping he would.

[-] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The "immigrants are eating your pets" works on his followers unfortunately.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

Anything would work on those followers. They are not the people anyone is trying to convince with the debate.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

Then they aren’t very good at their jobs.

[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 13 points 1 month ago

A dead horse will never win the race, even if you drag it around really fast.

[-] wanderer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

A not totally incompetent trainer of a dead horse would not be stunned how bad the dead horse does.

[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago

From the text, I conclude that the team trained El Douché apparently successfully, but the moment he approached the stage something popped in his head, the whole house of cards tumbled down.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Trump is drowning in the misinformation you helped create yet now you wonder why he did badly?

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 15 points 1 month ago

When up against someone who can at least stay on topic, he looks like a mad man.

[-] AnitaAmandaHuginskis@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Apparently, all that practice with members of his team, such as former Hawaii Representative Tulsi Gabbard, had ultimately amounted to very little when it came time to debate.

Well, in his defense, you try to teach this idiot anything. It's impossible. /s

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

TBF he did terribly on the first debate as well, however he was able to form up his “terrible” strongly in mostly coherent lies that left Biden’s mumbled and lost “decent” truths in the dust.

This time Harris led strongly and let trump hang himself, which he did admirably at.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

That's just testimony that his cadre of sycophantic deer ticks are just as stupid as he is deranged.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Reality is truly shocking

[-] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Maybe they need more mouth breathing. I would have sworn they had it covered but…

[-] hate2bme@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

This kind of article is such a joke. This is the same as them saying they are told people are eating dogs.

this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
408 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4341 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS