265

What in the world...

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Mafia mentality, Trump would make this like North Korea if he could. He would totally want to be our divine ruler. Fuck that noise and fuck the gang that is the GOP.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago

fuck the ~~gang~~ that is the GOP.

fuck the terrorist organization that is the GOP.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

It's only the GOP because they started pandering to the dixiecrats.

They gave the KKK legitimacy and power, but the tactics didn't change.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Hey now, remember who the real terrorists are. Climate activists.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Also BLM and OWS, the monsters.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

You’re forgetting the Vegetarians?! HAH! You fools, you fell victim to one of the classic blunders!

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

These sickos are making plant-based beers.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Oat sodas???

Regarding North Korea, it's a bit ironic in the end, considering...

Davis had confronted the aide near the elevators and dressed her down. You don’t ask a reporter to delete their notes, he told her, according to both Davis and a second person he recounted his remarks to briefly after. This isn’t North Korea."

Also this claim was made,

The Trump campaign subsequently investigated and claimed to Wren that the woman in question was not formally involved in Trump's campaign.

But then what about the other four men who also blocked his exit? Even if the campaign's claims are all correct, something's still a bit off here...

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

He had to run to escape from thugs trying to keep him in the room. That sounds like attempted kidnapping.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Did anyone read the article or are we just going off a fairly misleading headline?

From the headline, it seems like a mafia style threat. From the article though:

Davis tried to explain to the woman that he had to catch a flight to meet up with his family, to which she replied, "You should have thought about your kids before you did what you did."

The threat here isn't that someone is going to come after his family, it's that he might miss his flight. Which is annoying but absolutely not the same as "we know where you live and are coming after your family."

[-] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 67 points 1 month ago

No, it was absolutely a Mafia-style threat. Here is the entire article, emphasis added:

Politico reporter Adam Wren, while reporting on potential Trump attorney general Mike Davis, was subjected to ominous threats and intimidation from an unidentified Trump ally.

As part of his lengthy profile of Davis, Wren wrote about an experience he had writing down notes about Donald Trump Jr. telling Davis that he wanted Davis to be Trump's next attorney general for the next four years.

At this point, an unidentified woman accosted Wren and demanded that he hand over his phone and delete the notes he had taken.

Wren then tried to leave the area -- but was subsequently blocked from the exits by four men who similarly demanded that he hand over his phone.

Davis tried to explain to the woman that he had to catch a flight to meet up with his family, to which she replied, "You should have thought about your kids before you did what you did."

"After roughly 15 minutes of this standoff, I searched for another exit," Wren continued. "I ran down a hallway into a stairwell. Two people followed me. When I was out on the street, Davis called me. By this point, Davis had confronted the aide near the elevators and dressed her down. You don’t ask a reporter to delete their notes, he told her, according to both Davis and a second person he recounted his remarks to briefly after. This isn’t North Korea."

The Trump campaign subsequently investigated and claimed to Wren that the woman in question was not formally involved in Trump's campaign.

5 people believed that they had a right to do any of that, on any level. It had nothing to do with a flight.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

So it was Laura Loomer. Natch.

No, not mafia. Batshit.

[-] Reyali@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago

“What he did,” though, was just take notes as a reporter. He took notes then tried to leave with them, where he was accosted and threatened and told to delete the notes. When he continued to express a desire to leave and mentioned his kids, that comment came out.

I agree that it’s not as bad as the headline makes it sound. But it also doesn’t seem like the reporter did anything that he shouldn’t have done which would have given him reason to be accosted…

Charitable reading, this was just an off-the-cuff comment at the maturity level of, “I know you are but what am I?” where the aide used a quick comeback without thinking much about her words.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Oh absolutely, he shouldn't have been accosted etc. But I really hate this clickbait nonsense, it's irresponsible and part of why things are as bad as they are. Most people will look at the headline and think these people really are targeting reporters' children etc. It's lazy, irresponsible and is helping make politics as bad as they are.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago
[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

His base will eat that up too. They'll chant hurt those people we hate, they deserve it.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Perfect mic placement. He looks like a cartoon.

[-] raynethackery@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Always have something setup on your phone to automatically upload your notes.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

Raw Story - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Raw Story:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.rawstory.com/trump-ally-threatens-reporter/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
265 points (95.2% liked)

politics

19080 readers
3581 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS