276
submitted 17 hours ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Can you imagine the horror on the faces of some future generation of they find these things in between the belongings of their grandparents after they pass away.

Or maybe they will think they're rich and can finally afford that new roof for the trailer.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

Nazi memorabilia does quite well on secondary markets still. How is this any different? Humans will always have a morbid fascination with idiots of the past.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago

The Con-Man loves to get his base to buy junk.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 28 points 11 hours ago

“1oz .999% silver medallions”

So 3x the price of other 1 ounce silver rounds?

https://sdbullion.com/silver/silver-rounds/1-oz-silver-rounds

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago

It should have been .88%

[-] mercano@lemmy.world 16 points 6 hours ago

You can’t launder foreign campaign donations by selling things at wholesale prices.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

"C'mon. it's got his ugly face stamped on it. That's worth atleast 47x on it's own!" -Trump, probably.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

24 ounce "Trump Train" - $856:

[-] bitwolf@lemmy.one 4 points 4 hours ago

Dude needs to learn some body positivity and embrace his true form

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 1 points 49 minutes ago

It really doesn't look like him. The hair can only do so much, it looks more like JFK than Trump.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

That's.... uh...

I'm lost for words.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 hours ago

I want to melt it down and turn it into a bullet, I then want to shoot whoever designed it for cringe.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 34 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I saw these being talked about on r/silverbugs, Reddit's silver-collecting community. There is definitely a higher-than-usual concentration of Trump supporters there and even they were lambasting it for being a dumb thing to buy.

The thing is, these can't even legally be called "coins". A coin is only called that if it's made with sanction from the state. Privately-made coin-like objects are "rounds". Silver rounds are pretty common and are basically all worth melt value. I have no doubt these "commemorative ~~coins~~ rounds" will meet their end five or ten years from now in someone's backyard kiln who will unceremoniously melt them down and cast them into some nice jewellery or a silver figurine.

Edit: I actually have some Trump design silver rounds. Not official Trump products, of course (or maybe they are, IDK). They are very common and worth nothing more than melt value. I paid melt value of these two. I traded one of them to my former roommate who's a Trump supporter for a cod.

Definitely going to keep the "never surrender" round that has his mugshot that they took after he surrendered though.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago
[-] Nednarb44@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago

Either a nice fish dinner or one of the call of duty games. Hard to say

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

I'm talking about the fish. Four packs of vacuum-packed fresh-caught cod fillets for one ounce of silver.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Sounds like you got the art of the deal down! You deserve a coin! 😀

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

This guy ~~fucks~~barters

[-] yeather@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 hours ago

Just as our ancestors intended

[-] nemonic187@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

One fish please!

[-] match@pawb.social 14 points 12 hours ago

melt value is like $35? if it's actually as pure as they say and i do not fucking trust them with anything

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Half lead certainly sounds like what they’d call 99.99% silver

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It's easy to test. There's a machine called a Sigma Pro that can test the purity of silver. It costs around a thousand dollars and every pawnbroker and coin dealer has one. If it isn't pure, they'll get busted immediately.

[-] rustydomino@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Can you not use Archimedes’ principle to determine silver purity? A decent kitchen scale and something to measure volume?

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

You can determine density using a scale, string, and some water, but this wouldn't be reliable enough to determine silver purity beyond 1-1½ significant figures. 950‰-970‰ pure silver would probably be within the margin of error you'd expect for 999‰ pure silver. That silver is basically "contaminated" from a dealer's perspective because it's unsellable due to being a strange purity and would have to be refined into 999 silver at a significant cost.

Dealers don't do this. A Sigma Pro machine is easier, more reliable, and faster.

For that reason, if you only had 1 ozt of it (or even 10 ozt), a dealer would maybe generously offer you half or two-thirds of melt value.

[-] yeather@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago
[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Lmao appraised’em’

[-] nemonic187@lemmy.world 54 points 17 hours ago

Money laundering. That’s what this is.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 26 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

It's not money laundering to sell dumb shit to idiots, like coins to magas, or bathwater to thirsty teenagers, or dogecoin to me

[-] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It certainly is if most of the dumb shit is bought by foreign powers as a way to fund a campaign. See also bibles, nfts, sneakers.

[-] nemonic187@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

It is if someone from outside the US, who can’t legally donate to Trump’s campaign, buys 100 of these.

[-] rbn@sopuli.xyz 28 points 15 hours ago

I have no clue if there's indeed any proof for such a claim, but the theory that I read elsewhere is that it's a way to obfuscate money flows.

If a foreign nation (Russia, China, North Korea, whoever) would like to engage in the election, they can't just donate to the campaign officially. But instead, they could buy a couple thousands of these coins in smaller transactions.

TBH I'm rather with you. I think the majority of these coins is just bought by some MAGAs. For foreign nations there'd be probably more efficient ways to transfer money like shares etc.

[-] nemonic187@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Pretty much exactly this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 19 points 15 hours ago

This is quite reasonable; his base are fucking idiots, and fall for this shit all the time.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

remember his NFT drop?

dumbasses.

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Yup. I'd continue squeezing them for cash, as they seem to love that sort of thing.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 20 points 17 hours ago
[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago

And the republicans will just say he's being enterprising.

[-] Irremarkable@fedia.io 12 points 16 hours ago

To be completely fair, this is the sort of thing he's done for forever now. A significant portion of his wealth comes from simply licensing the Trump name

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
276 points (96.6% liked)

politics

18909 readers
3380 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS