321
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] charonn0@startrek.website 195 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Littlejohn is charged with one count of unauthorized disclosure of tax returns and return information and faces up to five years in prison if convicted.

He should have violently stormed Congress instead. You only get like 3 months for that.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 114 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dude was arrested for showing everyone what trump was obligated to show, but illegally hid from everyone.

This is America.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

Not a legal requirement, just the "right thing to do"

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah. How the hell can that not be a legal requirement for a position like "president"?

It should be a requirement for any public office

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It should be, but nobody has ever refused before I believe.

[-] Alixxxaneveah@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 year ago

Turns out the founding fathers could not account for a situation where half the voting public wants everything to burn.

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I can't wait to find a redcoat that hates this guy but loves Snowden.

[-] CrazyEddie041@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Not to defend Trump in the slightest, but it was my understanding that the President isn't actually required to release his taxes; it's just a tradition that literally every other presidential candidate has conformed to. You know, to show that they're trustworthy, which is why Trump never released his.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago

Yep, Trump showed how much of the government actually runs on norms and traditions instead of actual laws. Even some of the laws that he did break (like the Presidential Records Act) don't actually specify penalties because Congress assumed it wasn't necessary.

[-] solstice@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The funny thing is, his tax returns were fairly unremarkable. I'm a cpa and my background is largely with high and ultra high net worth individuals and their businesses, so people like trump are my bread and butter. I reviewed his returns when they first leaked and honestly nothing jumped out at me as particularly noteworthy or interesting at all. All I can speculate is that he's just a stubborn asshole and simply didn't want to release them.

[-] OrangeJoe@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I always thought the big "issue" people were expecting wasnt that the tax returns were going to show anything illegal or noteworthy, but rather they would instead just show that he is worth way less than he goes around claiming.

[-] solstice@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

There was a lot of speculation about that but I'm not sure if there's any consensus. Individual tax returns only show income, and business returns only show book values (not fair market value which would help determine wealth). He had pretty big net operating loss carryovers from previous years which essentially zeroed out his income for a few years, so it's hard to say. I feel like I remember looking for foreign account disclosures but didn't see them in the returns, which would be at least one set of FMV numbers to go with. It's been a while since I looked though. Overall I walked away being disappointed so I'll stick with my original assessment, maybe I take another look later today though.

[-] flossdaily@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

If storming the capital gets your 3 months, then exposing Trump's fraud should get you... A medal of honor?

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but this is America. Where democrats run the show, but conservatives do whatever they want with impunity.

[-] devil_d0c@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Damn poor guy. I'll put 20 bucks on his books for Ramen. Dudes a true patriot.

[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

The rich deserve to be exposed for the countless crimes they've committed over the decades with tax dodging. Good on this man. It speaks volumes of how shitty our country is though when January 6th insurrectionists get less time than this guy might though.

[-] Alixxxaneveah@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 year ago

Sadly, a jury of his peers will be people who make just enough that they are suddenly concerned about their tax return privacy despite being a W2 earner.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Maybe he and Trump can be cellmates!

[-] firewyre@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

The hero we needed. Good job sir.

[-] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Why are tax returns not public property? In Sweden you can look up anyone's tax info.

[-] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
A man named Littlejohn, so sly,
Stole Trump's taxes as they caught his eye,
For his audacious feat,
A national hero's seat,
Damnthefilibuster says, let him fly!
[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. Limerick to be precise.

Brain no worky. GPT to the rescue!

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ah true! A limerick! Nice.

[-] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Prompt engineering ftw.

[-] autotldr 6 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Federal prosecutors announced charges Friday against a contractor with the Internal Revenue Service who allegedly stole the tax returns of a high-ranking government official.

A source familiar with the matter told CNN that official is former President Donald Trump.

The man, 38-year-old Charles Edward Littlejohn, worked with the IRS from 2018 to 2020, according to court documents.

Though the official is not named in court documents, a source familiar with the investigation told CNN the tax returns in question were Trump’s.

“Both news organizations published numerous articles describing the tax information they obtained from the Defendant,” court documents said.

The New York Times and ProPublica both published articles based on tax records of the former president and other wealthy Americans around the same timeframe – in 2020 and 2021, respectively.


The original article contains 308 words, the summary contains 130 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

I love how it's about someone leaking documents and the very next thing is someone leaking to CNN that this case is about Donald Trump.

There's a certain meta humour to this that's kind of impressive.

[-] downpunxx@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

littlejohn is what a patriot looks like because what he did is what patriots are supposed to do in the face of fascism

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Well ...

In addition to the former president’s tax documents, Littlejohn is also accused of stealing IRS information on “thousands of the nation’s wealthiest people, including returns and return information dating back more than 15 years.” Littlejohn then sent that tax information to a second unnamed news organization.

If it was only Trump's tax returns, then I might agree with you. It wasn't targeted specifically and only at Trump; it was an extremely wide net that was cast, and we don't know who the rest of the people are. Based on the information publicly available, this appears more like an attempt to sell the information, or act illegally based on some fringe principle.

[-] solstice@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

He should've posted them all online. As a cpa with a bit of rare downtime on my hands I'd love to volunteer to review returns for the irs. I know all the errors and omissions, tricks and and gimmicks, goofs, fuckups, whoopsies, you name it. 20% commission for the recovered taxes seems fair compensation.

[-] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

damn, like a vigilante accountants equivalent to the justice league. Would you be wearing a costume in this hypothetical?

[-] solstice@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

What makes you think I don't already wear a crime fighting suit to work? There was a documentary about it and everything, The Accountant. I specialize in espionage, intrusion/counter intrusion, taking some CPE next week for long range assault weaponry, the usual.

[-] Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

Tax returns in US should be public to anyone and everyone, like they are in many countries.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Are they? Where? It seems odd to me that a government would disclose how much everybody makes.

[-] solstice@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I read once that maybe Sweden or Norway has publicly available tax returns. BUT, the person whose return you look at gets notified when you view it, so you can't just go around subtly snooping on your friends and neighbors without being noticed. Idk if that's true though.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Justice means the wealth would be more equitably distributed, imo, and nothing indicates the data was sold.

Also, people really need to skip the NYT. Propublica got it right.

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
321 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2345 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS