1455
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mojo@lemm.ee 168 points 1 year ago

I will never not read that as magic the gathering, it makes the news so much better

[-] CheeseToastie@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
[-] scoops@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Marjorie Taylor Green, Congress woman from Georgia. (Jewish space laser)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 123 points 1 year ago

the next tweet, wonder when marge started throwing a fit

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 91 points 1 year ago
[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 121 points 1 year ago

I can't believe the Republicans are appeasers. They beat the drum for decades how Democrats couldn't stand up to tyrants, and now Republicans are literally appeasers. It's 1984 levels of turnaround.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 73 points 1 year ago

They don't believe in anything but power. Internal consistency is not a concern.

Republicans are an existential threat to the US and we should treat them as such.

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

I wish there was only some evidence the GOP is aligned with Russia........

[-] hemmes@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

It’s not like you’re gonna find them all flying over to Russia together, like during the 4th of July or some crazy shit like that…

[-] weedazz@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

They will verbally jerk off Ronald Regan for "outspending the USSR into dust" and then act like Ukraine Aid doesn't do the exact same thing

[-] frezik@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago

It's a whole party caught between giving head to their long term partner, the Military Industrial Complex, or their new side fuck, Vladimir Putin. Either way, the rest of us are forced to lick up the leftovers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fun fact for those on the fence about this, the US has monetary sovereignty in a fiat currency, which means that the US government has essentially infinite money.

Edit: for those that are curious, yes, the game about the federal budget is exactly that. The deficit is essentially tracking the amount of money that the federal government owes to itself. Remember, fiat currency means that the value of money exists because the government says that it holds that specific value. A $2 dollar bill is still worth $2 when purchasing items, but worth several $ more than the printed value.

Edit 2: I didn't think it needed to be said, but I've been proven wrong. I don't literally mean infinite money.

[-] swab148@startrek.website 24 points 1 year ago

I wonder, sometimes, what a society would look like without inflation. Is there an economic system that says "this is the price of bread, from now on" and builds off of that?

Of course, my only talents are music and memes, so I doubt that I'd specifically benefit from such a system, but maybe humanity as a whole?

[-] itsprobablyfine@feddit.uk 18 points 1 year ago

One of the reasons some inflation is 'good' is that it drives investment. People are discouraged from saving their money since it will slowly devalue. Rather, those with capital are incentived to invest it in other areas of the economy.

[-] swab148@startrek.website 11 points 1 year ago

That would only happen if deflation was a thing too. In my (highly idealistic) world, money would not change value at all, so growth in a business would be real, not just projected numbers on a chart no one understands. In a fixed-econony, you invest into businesses that actually grow.

I know this may come off as controversial, but this sort of thinking will be necessary for interstellar trade, if we don't blow ourselves up first.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Then bread becomes the currency

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic, but I love the revolutionary optimism. That has been a question that has been posed in philosophical politics ever since Marx and Engels were alive.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Before even then

Price controls were something people were trying even as far back as the crisis of the third century when Diocletian set the standard prices for several common items bought by the Roman peasantry like bread.

Contrasting against the grain dole, which worked better because it was the state stepping in to directly remove a large cost from the lives of eligible households, allowing them to put that money towards improving their fiscal standing. For ancient Romans it was Bread, but for modern Americans a solid equivalent would be medicine or education, shit you could argue that the post war boom was in part because of the govt. doing this partially with housing, subsidizing the costs of WWII vets to build new homes or buy existing ones, of course because America black vets got shafted and redlined but the general idea is still there.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Wanderer@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Holy Zimbabwe Batman!

For those that are curious this is not even remotely close to how the economy words. The us government absolutely does not have unlimited real money, sure they can print money and it will become worthless. But that's not the same.

load more comments (31 replies)
[-] acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Holy shit.. they’re STILL on about “the Clintons”? At least it wasn’t the Clinton Soros Obama Global Initiative…

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ProfessorPuzzleCode@lemmy.world 121 points 1 year ago

I think that MTG, and a lot of commenters on here, need to realise that Ukraine will not stop this war until Russia are out, regardless of the international support or otherwise. Even if Ukraine is overrun completely the war would not stop, but would go on until Russia leave.

[-] dag__@lemmy.world 85 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I would add three things to what they need to realize:

It is possible for Ukraine to win.

Russia is a ruthless and incompetent oligarchy, and they cannot be allowed to expand their territory.

Fighting or fleeing are vastly preferable to being subsumed by Russia.

[-] ProfessorPuzzleCode@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

All perfectly correct. However, it is a war that Russia will never win, like Afghanistan.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago

To elaborate on this point: Russia is trying to 1 take Ukraine and 2 keep it. They have not succeeded in part 1, and part 2 is much much more difficult. Afghanistan, as stated in the above comment, is a good example of this: the war to take Afghanistan took less than a year, whereas the struggle to keep it under control was failing two decades in.

Russia can't even do the easy part.

Of course, this is assuming that they're not just trying to keep hold of Crimea so they have a port on the black sea, which I think is the real reason they're prosecuting the war.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

To add on -- we need to recognize that Russia is trying to enforce the old rules of imperialism. In their eyes, Ukraine did not have the right to determine their own future and who they wanted to ally with. Russia had to approve of all their decisions and Russia controlled them.

Defeating Russia is more then Ukrainian independence. It is an unequivocal statement by the West that we will not allow imperialism nor wars of conquest to resurface in Europe. And hopefully with time, this extends to the rest of the world too, and other countries will check Western ones if we begin to forget that.

At the end of the day, a country's sovereignty and right to self determination are sacred, only to be stripped if they use it to deny others of the same. There is a clear leftist geopolitical perspective here for continuing to back Ukraine.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago

People refuse to recognize that the Ukrainian people do not want to be taken over by the Russians. There's no good reason why they should be. They refuse to acknowledge the desires of the people, maybe because fighting back against an oppressor is foreign to their own cowardly psychology.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] _sideffect@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Democrats need to hit back more like AOC does

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

And Fetterman. These two really make me smile with their next level trolling.

[-] AngryMulbear@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago

I don't always see eye to eye with AOC, but I know her heart is in the right place. Can't say the same for any other politician, Republican or Democrat.

[-] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Same. I think her and Bernie believe in what they're fighting for and it's for the good of the people, not corporations.

I may not agree with some of their positions but I believe they are doing what they believe is right. 9 times out of 10 I will vote for someone I think is honest and trying to do what's best for the country even if I disagree with them, and I refuse to vote for an obviously dishonest politician even if I do agree with most of their positions.

[-] Smacks@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

If it pisses off MTG you know it's good

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

I would've preferred if Ukraine funding was still in there, but MTG screeching is an alright consolation.

I find it interesting too how many people wanted "a clean bill" but then voted against it anyway because it didn't have extra stuff they wanted or, in Rand Paul's case, they're fucking pieces of shit.

[-] okamiueru@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Probably the only thing Russia didn't want to budge on for its foreign assets.

[-] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Is there a video of the tantrum?

[-] oleorun@real.lemmy.fan 24 points 1 year ago

Like a toddler at a candy store.

[-] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Worse. She's paid for this

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Fuck MTG, Boebert, Loomer and all the other repcunts.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 22 points 1 year ago

MTG gonna be even more mad when she sees this 😂

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

If she could read she'd be very upset

[-] GreenMario@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Stay mad forever bitch 😂

[-] teamevil@unilem.org 10 points 1 year ago

If anyone ever deserves to live by the rules she expects others to live by it's that dum bitch.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
1455 points (97.5% liked)

Political Memes

5401 readers
4558 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS