139
submitted 21 hours ago by GrammarPolice@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

This has to be against some kind of law right?

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 4 hours ago

Even if you pay, you'll still be tracked.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, they’ll still collect your data and happily sell it as soon as your subscription ends. Also, this subscription would likely only cover first-party tracking. It wouldn’t cover things like a Facebook Like button being embedded in the site, which allows Facebook to track you.

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 hours ago

Have you heard of adblocking?

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

Either pay for an vpn and clear your cache and cookies constantly or pay directly to the advertisers.

Freedom isn’t free, there’s a hefty fuckin fee.

If you don’t kick in your buck-o-5 who will?

[-] zerozaku@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Hey that's a lot better than companies who asks you to pay and still share your data for profits

[-] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

No guarantee these guys won't

[-] zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 hours ago

I mean, if you don't want to participate in the advertisement based monetization model, which you shouldn't, then the alternative to it is a subscription model.

these sites aren't free. we have the right to block advertising content and trackers on our browsers but that doesn't mean we have the right to block advertising while retaining no payment access.

[-] kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 hours ago

Err, this payment doesn't block ads. It only switches off personalised ads. So, the user is still seeing ads, just not targeted ones. So the site is getting both user's money plus ad money. And technically, I am not sure how privacy preserving this is because you will still need to create an account which technically leaves you vulnerable to tracking.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 4 points 6 hours ago

They want you to pay for the cost of the website you're accessing.
Which is reasonable.

And you can choose whether you want to pay with money or with your data.

[-] Mojeek@lemmy.ml 18 points 11 hours ago

The Express? There's definitely a not-reading-it option

[-] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

If the news is that important you'll find it elsewhere without this bs

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 hours ago

Haven't these cookie paywalls been ruled illegal?

[-] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Only in the EU apparently. Although, I could've sworn cookie paywalls were breaking some law

[-] rain_worl@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

website exists for people born in the eu -> it has to comply with the gdpr

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 10 points 13 hours ago

You’re not missing much.

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 46 points 19 hours ago

Saw this on Sunday. I think it fits here...

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

ublock origin has an annoyance list you have to manually enable, but it works wonders to get rid of those.

[-] Fijxu@programming.dev 5 points 7 hours ago

I always do this when I can't see a page. I also do it when they pop out a big box with text in the middle of the reading and if they also pop out a big box begging me to accept the cookies.

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 17 hours ago

The website doesn't really care; they have hosting costs so if you're not paying with money or by accepting ads then to them you're worse than not visiting at all as you consume resources, so it's good if you leave?

[-] UxyIVrljPeRl@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

but the offer has consumed resurces

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago

Sure, but people have memory and if you block people who aren't even going to contribute to the running costs of the site via the channels they provide, never mind profit, then from the site owners perspective it's pretty great if you recognise it as a site you don't want to visit as you likely won't come back

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 13 points 17 hours ago

So, it's win win. Good scenario.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

This has to be against some kind of law right?

Only in the EU.

Anyways I think that "pay or consent" model isn't that bad. You either pay with your data or your money. Seems fine to me though pay only would be better. Everyone is used to getting everything online for free. It has to change now imo. The internet isn't a bunch of hobby forum projects anymore. The price of running a popular website is big and idk if privacy-respecting ads can give enough profit at this point.

[-] Aradia@lemmy.ml 10 points 14 hours ago

You can show ads without tracking and keeping users their right to privacy, right? I think it's different selling user data than having some ads on your website.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 2 points 14 hours ago

You can but, as I said, it's much less profitable.

[-] wrekone@lemmyf.uk 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Which brings us back to the real, underlying, problems with the prevalent model: greed and the concentration of wealth.

[-] zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

which is inherent to, and the express goal of a capitalist economic system.

[-] Cris16228@lemmy.today 4 points 14 hours ago
[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 2 points 14 hours ago

Some people will find a way to abuse everything for ultra profit. Sadly it will never change.

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 20 hours ago

thank brexiters for that, it's illegal in eu

[-] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago

Remind me why we left again

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 15 hours ago

To reduce regulations and taxes on rich people, mainly.

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 17 hours ago

no it's not, it's a loophole in the legislation that was actually first used and is still most popular in France?

[-] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 17 points 18 hours ago

Moral of the story? Don't read the Express. To quote Dave Gorman, it's a crock of shit.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 38 points 21 hours ago

Don’t worry, once they have your credit card number they’ll track you even more. At best you’ll get a £‎2.35 cheque from a class action lawsuit in seven years, assuming they ever even get caught.

[-] ZeDoTelhado@lemmy.world 27 points 21 hours ago

What a fantastic website not to visit

[-] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

I just wanted to read one article, so i have to pay to reject cookies even though I'll probably never end up on that site again. What a fuckin joke!

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago

It's the express, you're better off never reading a word they print

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 points 19 hours ago

Archive.is is your friend

[-] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 20 hours ago
[-] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 9 points 19 hours ago

Now that's the real PrivacyPlus™

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 5 points 19 hours ago

And it's free.

[-] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

Never heard of consent-o-matic. I'm gonna have to check it out

[-] dgriffith@aussie.zone 16 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Not really, it's just phrased differently to the usual signup pitch, they're putting in a middle ground between full "premium" subscribers (whatever that is) and public access with tracking and ad metrics.

Companies need revenue to operate. They get that revenue from advertising data and selling ad slots, or subscriptions. Whether they actually cease all tracking and ad metrics when you subscribe is something I'd doubt though, and that could be a case for the legal system if they didn't do what they claim.

Personally, this behaviour is the point where I would not consider the site to be valuable enough to bother with.

[-] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

Wasn't it illegal to not let a user reject a cookie? In the EU at least

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 2 points 18 hours ago

Is this related to the new laws in Europe? I remember seeing something about Facebook introducing a paid tier

[-] Echo5@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Besides the point but are you able to get around it with internet archive?

[-] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Gets around it perfectly

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
139 points (94.8% liked)

Privacy

31607 readers
720 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS