449
submitted 3 weeks ago by PortoPeople@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 92 points 3 weeks ago

And note that her wording was "at least $15", so she's signaling openness to doing more than that

[-] grue@lemmy.world 68 points 3 weeks ago

Good, because "fight for $15" has been going on so long that the real number to regain parity with what minimum wage used to be is a lot higher than that by now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 72 points 3 weeks ago

Wait, doubling it -to- 15 dollars an hour? Holy shit, I knew it was bad, but that is insane. Ours is already starting to feel too low at 17.40 here in Canada, granted that is about the equivalent of around $12.50 USD. So it's lower than what she is proposing, maybe if she manages it, we'll be able to get ours up.

[-] Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, the states have been moving towards 15, but the national minimum wage has been stuck for a few decades. And also yes, 15 is already way too low.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Most states have their own minimum wage laws at this point. Not all of them. So this will help a handful of mostly-red states.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago

It varies by province and at the federal level in Canada, 17.40 is for BC specifically, Alberta and Saskatchewan are the lowest at 15, Nunavut is the highest at 19 and it's 17.30 for jobs under federal jurisdiction.

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

The last place I worked upped their minimum wage to $10 an hour. It certainly wasn't because of benevolence or federal shifts...they slowly realized that when you pay the absolute minimum, you only attract the minimum talent, and most of those positions had very high turnover rates that were costing the company more than it'd be to just raise the starting pay rates.

It was cheaper to pay those positions more money.

[-] BallsandBayonets 9 points 3 weeks ago

Unfortunately in my state where the minimum wage is higher than the federal, many service industry companies refuse to learn that lesson. Or they think 16 cents above minimum wage is enough to attract top tier talent.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Yes_Man@lemmy.world 42 points 3 weeks ago

I'll believe it when I see it. Seems every candidate has promised this for as long as I've been following American politics and no one actually manages it.

[-] Pyflixia@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 3 weeks ago

She's yet to pull out "I will lower taxes!" card that's been over-promised. "I will lower inflation rates!" card that's been over-promised.

So many empty promises from any politician that has ever said those.

[-] errer@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago
[-] rbos@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago

Dang that is a lot of trackers

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago

And if you read the document associated, its because they are pushing to raise on the $400+k/yr taxes.

Its a bit of an overview of course, but there is meat of course.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Gimpydude@lemmynsfw.com 38 points 3 weeks ago

$15/hr works out to be about 30k/yr. That's not enough to live on. We need a $30 minimum wage. It needs to be indexed to both inflation as well as congressional salary. If they get a raise, everyone gets a raise.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah that fight for 15 was in 2016. We are way past that fight needs to be fucking 25 to 30. But watch every single fucking Republican will vote against any increases of minimum wage. 7.25 is a fucking joke and law makers should be fucking ashame of themselves.

Actually any of them vote no on a raise should have all their money seized and made to live on minimum wage for 5 years.

[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Law makers should be making 7.25 an hour, and only when they are on the floor.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago

Canadian but same problem here. Long term we need UBI worldwide if we plan on ever moving forward as a species.

Short term we need benefits for those less fortunate keyed to inflation at a bare minimum. In Ontario people with disabilities are paid below the poverty line. It's disgusting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] match@pawb.social 35 points 3 weeks ago

fight for 15 years late

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago

Oh.

My minded automatically corrected that as "doubling from 15 to 30". Because that's what it needs to be, at least.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 30 points 3 weeks ago

I can get a two dollar raise...

Well it's better than the FUCKING CONCENTRATION CAMP I'd get from the other guy

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah except the concentration camps come with free room and board.*

*Charges for the room and board will be deducted from your earnings as a slave.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

Name a more iconic duo than politicians and making promises that rely on the cooperation of other branches of government.

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Not voting in enough Democrats into Congress to do anything and saying the Democrats didn’t actually want to do anything

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Wiz@midwest.social 17 points 3 weeks ago

Good!

Now also link it to yearly inflation annually in December!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 weeks ago

If the house and Senate approve. She can't just do it on her own

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 14 points 3 weeks ago

That's great!

Certain burger-flipping former presidents have legal fees to pay and this goes a LONG way to making due.

[-] Talisker@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

I believe all promises that are made within the last 30 days of an election!

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 10 points 3 weeks ago

This was literally her supposed signature issue when she was running with Biden.

She didn’t fight for it at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Heard this before. Democrats will encounter one tiny setback and give up until the next election cycle.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 weeks ago

Surely we'll get it this time.

[-] Pyflixia@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 3 weeks ago

You're about 5 - 10 years behind, maybe longer, Harris.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

And they'll STILL walk it back the moment some unelected clerk with only ceremonial authority objects. If not before THAT even happens.

They always start negotiations at "nowhere near good enough" and make tons of concessions to Republicans from there.

Even the GOP becoming a literal fascist party that never negotiates in good faith hasn't changed their toxic inadequacy and insistence on bipartisanship being the highest political virtue possible.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 6 points 3 weeks ago

Is this an argument as to why we shouldn't raise the minimum wage?

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I doubt many people make anywhere close to minimum, but no excuse not to raise it!

5-years ago? Yep, we had tons of clients paying rock bottom, or close enough. I'm not in the payroll business anymore, but the jobs my wife was looking at as a preschool teacher were $12+, and that job always pays shit. Walmart and Target start at $15, or more.

All this is a small town where you would expect small wages. I was in Manhattan in 1992 and was astounded at the prices. Ask my native friend how people survived on minimum wage. He looked at me funny and laughed, "Dude. No one gets minimum wage. $10 is as low as it goes."

Good news on one of those shit paying clients! They were really hurting and the new CEO turned everything around in a couple of years. At that time, they started paying $12, paying benefits and paying for education.

[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 12 points 3 weeks ago

Economies work from the bottom up and never the top down. The more money people have, the more money they can spend, and thus the more goods and services they can buy, and thus the more demand there is, and thus the more supply there will be.

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

This has been my argument for years. If you want a strong economy have a strong middle class...they're the ones with the disposable income.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
449 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3287 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS