428

North Carolina Republicans create "secret police force" (popular.info)

submitted 1 year ago by tintory@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] geekworking@lemmy.world 211 points 1 year ago

This includes the private residences of subcontractors and contractors who run businesses out of their homes

Even more crazy is that you can't tell anyone you've been raided, including seeking or talking to legal counsel.

So you technically are denied legal counsel if you are targeted by a blatently unconstitutional search.

And it's legal for them to destroy any incriminating records that they want at any time.

Unlimited power to target whoever they want and no legal recourse.

Welcome to Germany 1935.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 109 points 1 year ago

This law is categorically unconstitutional. It is a prima facie contradiction of multiple specific amendments in the bill of rights. This will certainly be thrown out - even hard-right judges won’t be able to justify this. It’s clearly not reasonable in the slightest.

[-] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 year ago

So are the lawnakers complete morons or do they have an ulterior motive?

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 year ago

Yes.

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Their motives are strictly unconstitutional and pure evil. Republicans want their own private gestapo.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 20 points 1 year ago

It's political theatre. If it passes, they get a Gestapo. If it is thrown out (likely), they can chum the waters and get their base frothing about "woke judges" or some shit.

Either way, they win.

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 16 points 1 year ago

Complete morons or performative assholes, you say?

[-] chakan2@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

even hard-right judges won’t be able to justify this.

They don't have to justify anything any more. You should stop pretending the constitution matters.

[-] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It does matter! It matters to us... unfortunately totalitarianism has taken control and the AC along with the GOP do not care... the mask is off.... it is now time for the 2nd amendment to be actually enacted by a well regulated militia who protects the constitution as the 2nd amendment laid out

[-] Archer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

even hard-right judges won’t be able to justify this. It’s clearly not reasonable in the slightest.

I dunno about that, Supreme Court looking pretty right wing lately

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

This will be a federal conservative policy soon enough

[-] LetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Reminds me more of Eastern Germany to be honest. But yeah, that's fucked up no matter where it happened before.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 134 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Moreover, Gov Ops staff will be authorized to enter “any building or facility” owned or leased by a state or non-state entity without a judicial warrant.

That sounds unconstitutional. I mean, the whole thing sounds unconstitutional but that especially.

[-] root_beer@midwest.social 33 points 1 year ago

Repealing the fourth amendment will be a plank on the GOP platform

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The 4th, 13th, 14th, 15th, 19th.... hell, all of them except the 2nd, really.

That's why a Constitutional Convention in the present climate scares the absolute shit out of me.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

They absolutely will go after the Second Amendment when they are ready to.

"Just take the guns. Due process later." - Donald Trump

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago

Conservative: "But I'm one of you!"

Republican: "LMAO!"

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

Lol yeah that’s 100% going to get thrown out in court.

[-] RavenFellBlade@startrek.website 126 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, look. The party of Nazi apologists is passing laws to make their own Gestapo. But everyone comparing them to Nazis are the real problem.

[-] root_beer@midwest.social 23 points 1 year ago

That’s when you respond saying “fine, NKVD then, you guys are like the Soviets”

See what the assholes say then

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

seems like a violation of the 4th amendment but knowing the current supreme court they'll rule it doesn't apply to state laws (but the 2nd amendment does!)

[-] PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

The constitution only applies when the billionaires giving them huge bribes say it does. Couldn’t be simpler.

[-] ImmortanStalin@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 year ago

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Moreover, Gov Ops staff will be authorized to enter “any building or facility” owned or leased by a state or non-state entity without a judicial warrant. This includes the private residences of subcontractors and contractors [emphasis mine] who run businesses out of their homes, lawmakers say.

As if the name isn't hilariously evil enough...

This would have been front-page news a decade or two ago. So far out as to be unbelievable except by the lunatic fringe. "Nah, the government would never go that far."

Full fucking stop. No government agent is coming in my home without a judicial warrant. I am not a big man. I am not a tough man. I AM able to enforce that statement. We'll play Ruby Ridge II up in here come to that.

Imagine conservatives trying to spin that shit.

Police: "Well the law says we can kick his door down and take his shit without approval from the judiciary. So we tried. And the mad man turned his front door frame into a hell storm of lead!"

Y'all liberals better pull your head out your ass in a fucking hurry. Fascism is here, now, today. If you can't defend yourself, you are not peaceful, you are harmless.

(And I know, I'm old, so it's easier to throw my life down. But I'm not getting on the concentration camp train.)

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Okay, for those of us that don't want to go down in a hail of bullets, what is the option if we wanted to survive? Any good countries to look at moving to?

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That's right, Jebediah. You tell 'em. Ain't no varmints nor lawmen gettin' through yer door. They'll get a face fulla buckshot, aw' right.

[-] DoctorWhookah@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Dang old revenuers, man!

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago

chuckles I'm in danger.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 27 points 1 year ago

Benjamin...get the Musket.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

Sounds like someone is gearing up to steal a fuckton of money and wants power over any investigation that might stem from it.

[-] febra@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

So more nazi stuff coming out of the GOP. What's wrong with you America

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 8 points 1 year ago

Decades of siding with fascists over even milquetoast socialists, including when NATO member Greece got couped by its own military.

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 19 points 1 year ago

That rat fuck Tim Moore.

[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

With some people all you need is one look and think "that guy is a awful person and shouldn't be anywhere near dictating rules for other people." and this guy is one of them. Though to be fair that's like 95% of elected Republicans as well

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

We need more Republicans put in prison for stuff like this.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

No national sources on this?

Is this one local? I don't know of it. https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article279613749.html

Truthout is the best source I could find.

https://truthout.org/articles/north-carolina-gop-passed-budget-creates-secret-police-critics-warn/

[-] greenfish@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

That's a newspaper based in Raleigh, reputable as such things go. Source: I live nearby

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago

Found this Newsweek article just now:

https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-secret-police-sparks-fight-democrats-1831481

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Truthout is a good source. You know they are good because Karl Rove purposely gave them bad information so Republicans could come back and disparage the source.

[-] camr_on@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

News & Observer is a (in my experience) rather reliable source based in Raleigh, it is local

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Ground News has 6 sources: https://ground.news/article/north-carolina-republicans-create-secret-police-force_5cb6b7

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] argo_yamato@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

That's pretty messed up

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Smash Fascism

[-] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Ur swastika is showing.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

🎶Load up on guns, and bring your friends...🎶

load more comments

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023

428 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19120 readers

2586 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News