30
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago

So, Peter at the gates comes from a more or less literal interpretation from the passage where Jesus was making Peter the first pope. “To you I hand the keys to the kingdom of heaven….”

What Jesus was saying is that Peter got to decide who was in the Blood Ritual Cannibal Club,

Keep in mind, the books were written well after Jesus died, and the scriptures weren’t canonized until 300 years later; at the council of Nicaea- which was called specifically to “unify” the church. A lot of the choices about what was canon or not was specifically made to protect the bulk of the bishop’s authority (by drawing a straight lineage of succession from Peter.)

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 29 points 4 hours ago

Nope. Lots of stuff commonly believed by Christians isn't from the Bible. (Though sometimes they'll do a lot of mental gymnastics to assert that what they believe is from "the only reasonable interpretation" of the Bible.)

Just a few other things commonly believed by Christians not (or at least only dubiously) from the Bible:

  • The seven deadly sins
  • The nine circles of hell
  • The seven levels of heaven
  • Transubstantiation
  • The trinity
[-] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 18 points 4 hours ago

Transubstantiation is kind of in the Bible. Matthew 26:26-28

While they were eating, Jesus took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to his disciples, saying, “Take and eat; this is my body.”

Then he took a cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you. This is my blood of the[a] covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.

The discussion of transubstantiation is just how literal "my body/blood" is.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 10 points 3 hours ago

Transubstantiation is the doctrine that it ceases being bread and wine. Which St Paul kind of debunks in his first letter to the Corinthians at Chapter 11, where he refers to it as bread.

"For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes."

What you're talking about is consubstantiation, which is where the body and blood physically coexist in the bread and wine, which can be derived from the Bible.

[-] Live_your_lives@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

This is much more of a list of stuff commonly believed by Catholics, not so much by Christianity as a whole.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 hours ago

That humans eventually become angels.

Though, there was one human who did, in an apocryphal book. And then was elevated yet again to being a second diety; there were apparently strains of Christianity which were DUOtheistic! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enoch

[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Matthew 20:30

"At resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven."

I think that's where the sentiment comes from. It's explicit in Mormonism (I think). In mainstream Christianity the saved don't become angels, they become like angels.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago

So is "God helps those who help themselves"

[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

The sentiment is there though..

2 Thessalonians 3:10 "While we were with you, this we commanded you: If someone won't work, then neither shall they eat"

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago

The Trinity is clearly taught in the Bible. Sure, not in explicit Athanasius creed form, but Jesus even said "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit" (Matthew 28:19).

Notice how "Name" is singular, implying the Father, Son and Holy Spirit is one thing, or at least equal. Jesus is referred to as God, the Father, and the Holy Spirit are also. And it's made clear that there is one God. The Athanasius Creed is just the Trinity clearly defined in a single text. Clarifying interpretation (like the Nicene Creed).

Seven deadly sins are based off of various sins listed in the Bible, but most of it has kind of been overhyped and overemphasized. It's useful for giving a rough idea of what sin is, but it's been meddled with over time.

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 3 points 3 hours ago

Like watching people argue fanfic canon in here. 😅

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Minimize it all you like, but no one ever started a bloody war over "Encounter at Hotpoint". Yes, all human culture is alike in some ways. Very clever observation. I think you will find that most of the people engaged in this discussion are not even Christian. It's still significant and meaningful, if not to us personally, to the world we exist in.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 20 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

St Peter doesn't judge you! He's always depicted with a book that already contains the judgements. He has no real authority, he's just the gatekeeper.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I wonder if enough technicians go to heaven could the pearly gates can be automated so St Peter can finally retire.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 9 points 3 hours ago

Imagine being sent to hell over a database error

[-] moistclump@lemmy.world 3 points 56 minutes ago

Going to name my kid [NULL] so he has a fighting chance.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago

Imagine being sent to hell to be a database administrator. MySQL and Access, obviously

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 hours ago

THE FACTORY MUST GROW

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 4 points 4 hours ago

St Peter gets laid off, and unionises the other saints to go on strike.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Lucifer was cast out of hell for forming the first union.

[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It comes from Matthew 16

15 “But what about you?” Jesus asked. “Who do you say I am?”

16 Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.”

17 Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. 18 And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.”

[end quote]

So, yes, authority given to St Peter to "bind and loose" in heaven and on earth. How that's supposed to work alongside it being Jesus separating the sheep from the goats is anyone's guess.

The reason this takes place at the "pearly gates" is because the new Jerusalem descending from heaven in Revelation is described as having giant pearls for gates.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

He just checks the no fly list.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

Even "the bible" isn't "the bible".

"Protestant Bibles have only 39 books in the Old Testament, however, while Catholic Bibles have 46." source

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago

Neither of these mention St Peter at the pearly gates, though. The biggest addition the Apocrypha makes is a record of someone praying for the dead. Protestants generally still do recognise the Apocrypha, but just as historical records and not authoritative, hence not a part of the Bible.

[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

In Matthew 16 Jesus gives Peter the "keys to the kingdom" and in Revelation the new Jerusalem has pearls for gates. That's where it comes from.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago

The pearly gates are biblical. I think the keys are taken a bit literally. But that's interesting to think about, actually

[-] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 3 hours ago

Most Christian think of it like a cartoon. At least from what I can tell. Nobody actually seems to believe Peter is at the gates, but it is sometimes fun/useful to pretend that is what happens instead of trying to figure out what the judgement day really means (we often think of that like a court room with God as the judge and jury, but the scripture is not clear and so it isn't really any more correct that Peter at the gates)

[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Can't speak for Catholics but most reformed protestants (evangelicals) will be being taught their sins are already washed away and any judgement for the 'saved' after death is only about their quality of walk with god and quality of reward in heaven, it's not a heaven/hell judgment. That's only for the 'unsaved'.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Fascinating. Classism, in heaven. Work yourself to death so that you can enjoy a better neighbourhood of heaven than your neighbour.

[-] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 1 points 45 minutes ago

Mormons have three tiers of heaven. According to some, even Hitler would make it into the lowest tier. I'm not sure what you'd have to do to actually go to hell, which is supposedly just lonely infinite darkness away from the presence of God.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 minutes ago

hell, which is supposedly just lonely infinite darkness away from the presence of God

So, "days ending in a Y"

[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

"But many who are first will be last, and many who are last will be first."

However it's obtained it's something very hard for the well resourced and powerful to do. Jesus anticipated it's the "very least" in this life who have the capacity to be recognised as "first" in the Kingdom.

[-] Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

Aren't you staying dead for millenia until the second comming and the judgement day ? To my understanding the reason why Christian burry their dead rather than burning them is that they need to resurrect on jugement day

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago
[-] gramie@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 hours ago

There was a time, not that long ago, when cremation was not an option for Catholics. At some point, the church changed its mind. Maybe in the seventies or eighties?

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

this is my favorite explanation, by Leslie mann, of the role of St. Peter:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqwgEk_zPZI&t=07

[-] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 1 points 3 hours ago

lol. The OG Bible, you mean The Torah, Jesus isn't even in that one.

[-] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Although some would argue there's a lot of foreshadowing.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 3 hours ago

No, not at all. God does the judging.

[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Matthew 19:28

Jesus said to them, “Truly I tell you, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.

[end quote]

Whether "12 tribes of Israel" here is figurative of the global church or not, there still definitely some role in judgement delegated out to the apostles.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 2 hours ago

Interesting

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
30 points (94.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35801 readers
1433 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS