272
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 125 points 1 year ago

"we're going to need a list of all of the people you know..."

[-] mriguy@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago

She really needs to meet new people.

[-] JeremyT@lemmy.teaisatfour.com 64 points 1 year ago

She's his attorney... Literally paid to say such things.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

I hope she got her money up front, he doesn't exactly have a good track record of paying his lawyers on time.

[-] StarManta@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

I don’t believe that’s true for a second. Only someone unethical would do that, and I have it on good authority that he is very ethical!

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

The best ethics! Perfect ethics. Nobody is more ethicier!

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

they're not actually paid to lie, you know.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Everytime someone describes trump with "best, most, ever" in a positive statement I always assume it's trump telling them specifically to say that. He has the best words after all.

[-] aJazzyFeel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 34 points 1 year ago

I mean...she's a lawyer. She surrounds herself with the worst American has to offer in so, so many cases.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And apparently every parent, teacher, family member, judge, etc. she has ever met does not rise to the ethics of Mr Perfect Call Insurrectionist Pussy Grabber

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I've got to believe she's had at least one or two clients who were innocent.

[-] Chalky_Pockets@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Surely at least one, but that doesn't matter. Everyone does at least one thing right.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

she can go into, like, immigration law. Know a few immigration lawyers. their clients are amazing. I don't imagine their bills are as large as the one sent to trump, but it's not like trump actually pays the bills...

[-] barttier@feddit.de 30 points 1 year ago

I know, that she is getting paid and all. But damn... Thats just degrading. No amount of money would bring me to tell such a embarrassing lie. Alone the word "most" puts every other of her social interactions into scale. She basically said: "Me, my mom, my husband?, my kids?, my best friend, they are all ethically worse than Trump." This person seems to have no values.

[-] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

she is getting paid

Oh, was this lawyer actually smart enough to get payment up front? Because we know Trump normally doesn't pay his lawyers after the fact. If she got paid, she has no values.

[-] IonAddis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, my first thought there is...what sort of crowd do you usually run with then?

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I mean, she is a lawyer. That's what they do.

[-] dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Most lawyers, yes, are heartless capitalist fee-gouging sociopaths. But some of us do a lot to help the helpless, to our own detriment. We give everything for the underdog fighting these snakes.

So, while I don’t take the generalisation personally—because it’s largely true—please never forget the minority of broke empathetic legal practitioners toiling away behind the scenes seeking actual justice for clients.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

So, odds on when she leaves the team and starts telling people what a shit-show he really is?

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

So, odds on when she leaves the team and starts telling people what a shit-show he really is?

The second she has a book published and starts doing a promo tour for it, and not one minute before.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

I'm so sick of that shit. These people should be charged with being complicit for hiding crimes.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Funnily enough, she may end up getting charged for lying on her affidavit that there were no more classified documents at Mar a Lago. She used some legalese AKA weasel words that may protect her, but it remains to be seen. She was, however, already sanctioned for over $1 million dollars, and I wouldn't be surprised if she was disbarred by the time all is said and done.

[-] ghostBones@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Following that logic, it means she doesn't know any ethical people.

[-] VoterFrog@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Well she is surrounded by lawyers buh dum tiss

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Says less about Trump and more about everyone else she knows...

[-] moistclump@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Unless… she’s lying…

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

I’ve met sewer rats with a better sense of ethics.

Where did trump even find this lawyer? The 8th circle of hell?

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago

Bottom of the barrel. All of his other lawyers have dumped him.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Considering so many people refused to work for him, it’s possible. P

[-] EnderWi99in@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Trump is really running out of qualified attorneys. This lady only got into law a decade ago and up until now has represented reaility stars in petty civil cases. This is who Trump has representing him over any of his current indictments? That's wild!

[-] akai@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

He turned them over, he cooperated as he always does.

Yup, that's totally a lie ...

[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I thought lying in court was illegal?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Alina Habba, an attorney for Donald Trump, praised the former president for being “the most ethical American” she knows after he was hit with fresh superseding charges that accused he and his handlers of deleting footage sought by the federal government in a classified documents case.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

I know you're just quoting but that should really be "accused him" rather than "accused he"

[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Nice catch. Perhaps this is how we know this article wasn’t written by an AI lol.

[-] 2piradians@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

45 has a real penchant for surrounding himself with people who say things he wishes were true rather than the actual truth. I doubt he knows (or cares) there's a difference.

Hopefully that's a good thing in the sense that his legal team is so incompetent and out of touch with reality, they will get steamrolled (just as all his election fraud nonsense did).

[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

How many rubles did she get to say that

[-] Adeptfuckup@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Why only the most unethical lawyer would say something so ridiculous.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I wonder if he will be ethical enough to pay her?

[-] synceDD@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

"Attorney wont insult their client on cam" thank you for the hard hitting journalism

[-] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

"He's at least as ethical as I am!"

[-] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Ah, I love a good burn on Americans.

[-] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

She's either the best liar on the planet or the most ignorant person on the planet. Neither bodes well for the spray orange turd.

[-] DonaldTrumperino@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Only the best, most honest people work for the most ethical, stable, genius.

[-] Cableferret@lemmy.tf 4 points 1 year ago

She really should be disbarred for that statement, since it shows that she is too separated from reality to effectively practice law

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

key part of the phrase is "out of people she knows". man I realize it pays a lot but having to constantly isolate yourself less you get to know literally aaaaannnnnnnyyyyyyoooooonnnnnneeee!

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I'm curious how she defines ethics.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
272 points (95.9% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3826 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS