365
submitted 1 year ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

This week, hundreds of delegates from around the world began a monthlong meeting as part of Pope Francis’ “Synod on Synodality”—a gathering to discuss the future of the Catholic Church. It could radically change the religion. The group is considering groundbreaking alterations to orthodoxy on same-sex unions and whether or not women can be ordained as priests. The process has changed, too. For the first time, delegates include women.

A synod is a conference for church leaders and lay people to engage in conversation about how to bolster the good of the church. Since the 1960s, delegates from the global church have come together to discuss evolving issues. The current synod is part one of a multi-year process that will culminate in 2024 with Francis’ decisions and includes particularly controversial topics, like celibacy and divorce.

The lead up has been punctuated by conservative concerns about just how liberal this meeting may get. The synod kicks off days after a letter became public in which the pope considered blessing the existence of queer couples and the allowance of female priests.

Pope Francis wrote that while marriage is an “exclusive, stable and indissoluble union between a man and a woman, naturally open to conceiving children,” pastoral charity is also needed, and may be discretionary. Pastoral prudence, he wrote, “must adequately discern if there are forms of blessing, solicited by one or various persons, that don’t transmit a mistaken concept of marriage.” On female priesthood, the pope asserted that, whereas nobody can publicly contradict the church’s current rules prohibiting women’s ordination, they should study it.

For some, this rhetoric may seem like the bare minimum. But for others, like Americans on the right, it’s scary as hell.

Conservative Catholics across the U.S. have been some of the most vocal globally in pushing against reforms, and fear that the church is changing in a way that doesn’t match scripture or their ideology. One New York City priest, Reverend Gerald Murray, worried publicly that the pope “will authorize things that are not contained in Catholic doctrine or that will contradict it,” like women deacons or blessing gay unions. “We’re not Protestants,” he said.

Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke, Archbishop Emeritus of St. Louis, a vocal opponent to Pope Francis, was in the group that sent the pope a letter inquiring how he would be responding to these issues at the summit. “It’s unfortunately very clear,” Burke said on Tuesday, “that the invocation of the Holy Spirit on the part of some has as its aim to push forward an agenda that is more political and human than ecclesiastical and divine.” (Burke was not invited to the meeting at the Vatican.)

Pope Francis’ track record on queer and women’s rights is complicated. He formally allowed women to read from the Bible during Mass, but also came out against women becoming ordained. Speaking about queer people in 2013, the pope famously asked, “If they accept the Lord and have goodwill, who am I to judge them?” He has argued that homosexuality should not be treated as a crime in different countries but clarifies that he still thinks it’s a sin. Francis has framed many of these decisions as instances where localities should turn toward scripture and an evolving discernment as it befits their needs as part of his hope of growing the Catholic Church.

Because of this potential divide between local and global doctrine and application, it is possible that American Catholics may not even see these changes, should they be formally supported by the pope but not adopted by local priests.

As Mother Jones previously reported, American catholicism has splintered as some of the devout entrench themselves in wider conservative politics. Right-wing provocateurs like Milo Yiannopoulos and Steve Bannon notably have moved in Catholic circles saying Pope Francis should be curtailed. Yiannopoulos, who touts a traditionalist form of Catholicism, has been telling anyone who will listen to him, to “make the Vatican straight again” and “make America homophobic again.”

The pope himself seems unfazed by the ire of American Catholics. “They got mad,” he told reporters in late August after a squabble. “But move on, move on.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Bdtrngl@lemmy.world 123 points 1 year ago

Until they start paying tax and stop molesting children all of them can fuck right off.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As someone who is not an only atheist but an anti-theist, I have no love for the Catholic Church and either its ancient, middle-age, or present form. However, I’m also a realist. For the Catholic Church to even be publicly willing to discuss such matters (especially things like LGBTQ issues and female ordainment), well, even I’ll admit that something decent may come from this in the end, even if it’s not all what decent society may want (or demand).

In its history, the Catholic Church has been on of the world’s most renowned institutions for being inflexible in its conservative dogma. Extremely rarely do the even ever discuss openness, especially publicly, to changing doctrine. This is one of those extremely few times. I would be extremely shocked if nothing came from this, especially considering the current pope.

Certainly, there are many tractors that will hold back the more radical of proposed changes, but now is the time where we will see any serious changes were likely to see for a long time within the Catholic Church. I’m excited to see what manages to get done at this synod.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

I am sure this is a "be careful what you wish for" moment, but part of me is hoping that the American conservative Catholics are insane enough to try appointing their own Trump-aligned antipope and schism from the church, just so that the more rational Catholics in the US can have their literal "Come to Jesus" realization about how far gone the political right has become.

I firmly believe that there is a scary number of Americans who would get behind such a move. But at this point, I have just about accepted that the political divide in the US will not end peacefully, so if that's our fate, I'd like to at least have the lines drawn cleanly.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

You’re describing every form of Protestantism since Martin Luther.

C’mon…

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

A bit different; protestantism disagrees with the practice of having a centralized church at all, while other schisms in the Catholic church that took place in the past still maintained the church structure. They just appointed antipopes that were more politically aligned with their ideals.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

not just that but literally from this article:

"marriage is between a man and a woman"

no it fucking isnt. Source: all the places where you can get married without being a man and a woman.

they are saying pasta can only have red sauce while i eat a bowl of carbonara in front of them.

the best one can do now is say "marriage *should go back to being between a man and a woman", which they won't because they're fucking cowards.

they should own up to their own stupid ass beliefs.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 85 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yiannopoulos, who touts a traditionalist form of Catholicism, has been telling anyone who will listen to him, to “make the Vatican straight again” and “make America homophobic again.”

My dude, you are queer. You married a man and were proudly gay until a year ago. You're only just now faking a successful conversion to the straight life so your new Nazi friends don't lynch you in town square.

Go back to Britain and stop making American politics worse than it already is. Or stick around and don't act surprised when you inevitably get "Night of the Long Knives"-ed.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I went to google when his change happened (March 2021, for the record) and apparently since then he's taken up the cause of fundraising for conversion camps... so that's fun

[-] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Have you seen his pitch video for a Virgin Mary statue?

https://twitter.com/RightWingWatch/status/1460270627651305476

[-] VubDapple@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

The most vicious persecutors are those who attack in others what they repress in themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

I never thought of Milo as a fitter Ernst Röhm with highlights.

[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago

So Vatican 3 basically.

Back in the day mass was done entirely in Latin and the priest didn't address the congregation. This didn't change until the '60s. Some sects are still pissed off over it

[-] DieguiTux8623@feddit.it 11 points 1 year ago

Wait, what... we aren't even done with Vatican Council 2! 🤣

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Don't sweat it. These days nobody completes their papal backlog. It's a running meme.

Just make sure to wait for the Christmas sales.

[-] Burninator05@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It turns out that The Vatican and Valve have more in common that previously believed.

[-] troglodytis@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

"God is love." -god

"That bastard!" - conservative worshipers

[-] timicin@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I feel like the most galling thing about xtianity is that you can be the most violent, murderous, racist, homophobic pos forever and, per doctrine, you'll still be welcomed into heaven no matter what so long as you believe that the invisible sky friend exists.

[-] PorradaVFR@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Ok. Let 'em be mad.

[-] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

They're already mad about something, I'm sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Art3sian@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Fairytale believers angry that fairytale is changing.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Raymond Burke is a piece of shit who covered up sexual abuse of children. How he's still free blows my mind.

[-] Tired8281@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago

Wow, is Catholicism really ready to enter the 20th century!?

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

More accurate to say that some Catholic leaders are

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Conservative US Christians are mad as hell.

LOVE to see it!

[-] DieguiTux8623@feddit.it 5 points 1 year ago

catholic != christian Every catholic is a christian, not every christian is a catholic. The title was about US catholics.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

But, you can't deny that US protestants are mad as hell too. That seems to be their default state.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] spider@lemmy.nz 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Right-wing provocateurs like Milo Yiannopoulos and Steve Bannon notably have moved in Catholic circles saying Pope Francis should be curtailed.

Meanwhile, Bannon's friend Cheeto Jesus gets a pass.

[-] creamed_eels@toast.ooo 10 points 1 year ago

Yiannopoulos, who touts a traditionalist form of Catholicism, has been telling anyone who will listen to him, to “make the Vatican straight again” and “make America homophobic again.”

…what kind of self-hating fuckery is this?

[-] drislands@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

He's also pro-child abuse. No idea why anyone gives him a platform.

[-] popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago

I'd give it a better than zero percent chance that he's dug up and put on trial after death

[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Hopefully a ban on backing political candidates.. That shit is toxic

[-] Iamdanno@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

If you can just get together and decide "OK, now rule X has been changed to rule Y"; how is anyone supposed to take any of it seriously? It is literally made up as it suits them.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 14 points 1 year ago

I'm not here to defend any religion, but you're basically describing a social contract, which is just how humanity is organized

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

But the central conceit of any religious faith is the belief in the divine. The Pope is supposed to speak for God, the creator of all things, and the infallible judge of every soul that has or will have ever lived. Changing it to suit the modern social contract is a tacit admission that they were full of shit the entire time.

Like if the Church started blessing gay marriages, then all those homophones who marched around with plaquards promoting bigotry would have to acknowledge that they were just ordinary, hateful morons, instead of divinely righteous holy warriors.

[-] militant_spider@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The entirety of the modern Christian faith is that god said one thing to one group and then changed it. This is not to get into the debate of authenticity or logic of religion or anything like that, it’s simply how it’s always been. God said only the Jews get to be my people. Then it was everyone who believes. God said no unclean meats. The he said the meats were fine. It’s the nature of the Christian faith. If you include the Mormons, there’s more changes, but I don’t know them.

Within the faith, it’s accepted as basically a change in the promises god made to humanity. And if we look at it giving them some leeway, why can’t he change it again?

Hey hey now, no need to bring homophones into this! What’s wrong with ewe!

[-] Art3sian@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The answer is, they don’t agree and that’s how religion branches off and all these hundreds of denominations come into existence.

I worked in an Anglican school two years ago and it almost happened in my time there. As more kids were coming through with fluid gender, half the clergy were in support, the other half weren’t, so there was talk about splitting up and creating some kind of Anglicanism 2.0.

So, you’ve gotta wonder, if this has been going on for 2,000 years how far off its original tracks is religion today? And people still follow it like it’s God’s word? Even if it was God’s word we’ve proper fucked it a few hundred times times to suit our narrative since.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es 5 points 1 year ago

If you're really curious, you can look at the tomes... and tomes... and tomes of tomes written chronicling the tomes of Catholic doctrine. They may be nutty, but they reason their way to the outcome they decided in advance. Out of all the christian sects, Catholics are the most 'logical' in their beliefs, and definitely the most prolific in their apologetics.

So all of these changes being considered will be put on the ever-updating philosophy they have. In fact, many of the changes are likely already supported by some priest's writing, ready to be pulled out of the oh-so-super-secret heresy vault it's currently in.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Ooh, are they going to get replaced with AI?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
365 points (96.2% liked)

News

23287 readers
3538 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS