750
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

The fundamental difference between Luigi and the average American is that Luigi truly felt he was entitled to health care. He was so affronted by the injustice that he went postal over it.

Most Americans are either too demoralized or too cynical to believe they can do more than yell at a call center worker when claims are denied.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I understand why the French were fed up and went agro on the wealthy in 1789. Most Americans view the wealthy as heroes and will continue to take it up the ass without lube.

[-] tja@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

The wealth distribution right now in the US is almost the same as it was in France at that time

[-] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The French were starving to death in the streets in 1789. In the US, the average poor person is exponentially more likely to suffer from obesity, than to die from lack of food.

I wouldn't hold my breath for the American people revolt like that--things are simply not nearly as bad in the US now as they were in France then, and it's ignorant to equivocate them like this.

[-] dog_@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Can you burn a Luigi board?

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago

Frankly, it would be an objectively good thing if there were a trend of Luigi-esque incidents, because the only thing entrenched power structures will respond to is violence, and Luigi's methods did not leave much room for collateral damage.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

We need some kind of large scale morally righteous social struggle. Perhaps, to use a turn of phrase, a jihad on health insurance.

[-] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 59 points 2 days ago

So, totally unrelated, but like hypothetically, how illegal would it be to start printing guns and giving them to people with terminal illnesses who were denied coverage? No reason in particular

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago

Well remember the Republicans think gun control is bad, so.

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 20 points 2 days ago

It's almost like they're begging for it.

[-] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 days ago

You can’t manufacture a gun for somebody else unless you’re a registered gun manufacturer. You can only make one for yourself. You can hypothetically sell/give a printed gun to someone if when you made it you didn’t intend on selling or distributing it, however many states require you to transfer that firearm via a dealer.

You would have to give/loan your cancer patient a 3d printer and maybe suggest a URL. They would have to construct the firearm themselves without help.

[-] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What about pieces of a gun?

What if five people printed five different parts and traded them?

What if the pieces have multiple purposes, only one of which is part of the assembly of a gun?

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

You worry about the legality of printing a gun when you want to give it to someone to use for murder?

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

There's an old saying, "Never commit a misdemeanor in the middle of your felony."

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Commit one crime at a time. Trying to break this is what has gotten many big fish.

Remember, they picked up Capone on tax evasion.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Indeed, don't be the dumbass who gets caught trying to hide a body because you got pulled over for speeding.

[-] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Organized crime worries about legal issues all the time, and their whole purpose is crime.

Limiting liability, and plausible deniability, is a cornerstone of literally getting away with murder.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Eh. Aligning your organization with a patron politician or police organization is how you get away with murder.

The Italian and Jewish Mafias of the 1960s were paramilitary wings of the anti-Communist movement. Once Communism was officially squashed in the 90s, they got rolled up quick.

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 18 points 2 days ago

you can't murder people in the streets without having a badge.

yet ...

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 19 points 2 days ago

Sure you can. Nobody is going to stop you. Law enforcement will show up after to push brooms around and take notes, but you will already have achieved your goal.

[-] ramsorge@discuss.online 14 points 2 days ago

Illegal. But look into 80% lower receivers for more info.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Why does he always have a mouse cursor in his ear ? Is this a new US trend ?

[-] doughless@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Whoever took the original picture likely used a phone or camera to actually take a picture of a computer screen. I think I can see screen refresh artifacts in the image, too. It's mostly an illiterate computer user trend, or maybe someone in a hurry to capture a picture of someone else's screen.

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

It's mostly an illiterate computer user trend, or maybe someone in a hurry to capture a picture of someone else's screen

Its probably on a security/cop PC of some sort, much easier to snap a pic with your phone than to sneak a screenshot off of one of those

Yeah but like… move the cursor first.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

It's ok if you like wearing a mouse cursor in your ear, we won't judge you.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago

Cool, go assassinate another CEO if you actually care.

Posting on the internet does nothing.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Posting on the internet is effectively just leafleting, but on a mass scale.

That's not nothing, but it's certainly not enough.

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

Yeah, there might be some copycats, but I'm dubious. This reignited the healthcare and wealth gap conversation, but that's about it. Nothing meaningful will come from this in regards to our legislature taking action to help the lower and middle classes out.

This guy is likely to go to jail for a long time. Law enforcement spared no expense tracking him down, catching him within days even after making a relatively clean getaway after a fairly well executed plan. Not many people have nothing to lose and/or have no fear of those kinds of consequences.

In my opinion, until around 30% of our country is on the verge of starvation, unemployment, and/or homelessness, there won't be a mass movement that chooses to take forceful action. And even if that occurs, you can guarantee all the fancy police state surveillance they've put in place over the last 20-some-odd years will get dialed up to 11.

[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Fairly well-executed plan? Dude was eating in public in the same jacket he wore that day.

Not to mention going without the mask at Starbucks and keeping the manifesto and weapon.

He wasn't trying to seriously evade capture. But I think he was close to having a chance.

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

And yet the only reason he was caught as soon as he was, was because a McDonald's employee wanted $50,000 (and didn't even end up getting the money anyway).

I didn't say it was a flawless plan or even great, just that he did evade authorities for days despite the insane amount of resources NYPD poured into finding him.

[-] ultranaut@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

He was 100% getting caught regardless of who reported seeing him. The only chance he had was ditching everything and running forever.

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago

If he made it overseas, it would have been much harder.

I think he would have been much better off going immediately to a lawyer, and go into hiding for a while. Her could have afforded to Doordash some Mickey D's.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] rabber@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

I think that a lot of Americans have nothing to lose

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

And that number will be increasing drastically after Trump's fascism takes over.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 days ago

Fear

We all live in fear ... fear that if we speak up, we'll lose our job ... fear that once we've spoken up, we'll never be listened to again ... fear that if we lose our job, we'll never be hired again ... fear that without work and income, we won't be able to survive ... fear that we will be ostracized by everyone if they don't/won't/can't agree with us ...

... but most of all, fear that we will be destroyed by the judicial, police, security and legal system that is owned and controlled by those we try to rebel against

... and greatest of all, we will be killed for speaking out too loudly and prominently

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Sophia Artang is fake.

[-] BigLime@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 days ago

Dude had the means, resources, and time to do that stuff. Really desperate people are too busy trying to survive and don't have time for all this internet fetitization.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

He also had a sense of entitlement. Marginalized folks expect to be fucked over, so they're less likely to flip out and kill somebody when it happens to them.

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Mmm I wouldn't count them out.

[-] BigLime@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Revolutions start from the top down. Not the bottom up

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
750 points (97.2% liked)

Antiwork

3715 readers
44 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

The new place for c/antiwork@lemmy.fmhy.ml

This server is no longer working, and we had to move.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.1k

Date Created: June 21, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


Other Communities

c/workreform@lemmy.world


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS