461
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Does Musk actually care about Twitter any more?

It's served its purpose. It won the election for Trump. Musk will probably just focus on being Trump's puppy and let Twitter slowly die out.

[-] Rooty@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Ok, can we puh-leese stop talking about corporate media siloses on the fediverse? I keep seeing Elon's stupid mug plastered all over the media, can Lemmy be the exception, pretty please?

[-] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Content filters! I've got them for Trump, Elon, "Slammed", "Dragged", "Blasted" and the question mark, because news headlines in the form of questions can almost always be answered with the word "no" and are not worth my time.

[-] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

We can stop talking about after we've destroyed it

[-] DoeJohn@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

It's quite ironic that for a lot of people "destroying twitter" means spending half a day there, finding rage-inducing tweets and sharing them on other social media sites just so they can enjoy the free traffic and engagement. It would be nice if we could, you know, ignore it and let it die.

[-] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 2 points 21 hours ago

The Switzerland approach isn't going to work. It's datacenters must be rendered inoperable and disconnected from the grid and its billionaires made to flee to their bunkers.

[-] theTarrasque@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I Set up the content filter with „Elon“ and „musk“ which significantly reduced it. Now it’s just posts like these that remain. Can’t recommend enough!

[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

But then how am I supposed to find out about the latest manly cologne?

[-] net00@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago

The only thing I wanna see is the ElonJet guy back in a large platform, so that everyone gets easy access to the muskrat's location. That gets him specially angry as we've seen many times

[-] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago
[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 3 points 1 day ago

I don't understand why they don't just put up an RSS feed on elonjet.net Why even use social media posts? They've got their own website.

[-] witten@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Probably because nobody uses RSS. Or websites.

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 8 points 1 day ago

I identify with "old man yells at cloud" more and more every day...

[-] witten@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I know, rite??

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Social interactions.

[-] WeUnite@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

Good! Let's work to keep the momentum going and encourage everyone you know to boycott Twitter/X. If you still use Twitter/X make a post saying you can find me on Lemmy/Bluesky/Mastodon or whatever website/app you choose to replace it.

Don't let Elon Musk control you and your country, stop Twitter/X now!

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 3 points 1 day ago

Elon is teasing about offering an email service on X... why would anybody give him access to all of your private information?

50% off rust remover on your next Cybertruck

[-] whome@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 day ago

I would say musk got out of it what he could. Even if it went bankrupt I think he still got his money worth as mad as this sounds.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

He “lost” about 75% value of twitter, from $44bn to $10Bn Musk is worth ~$440Bn.

That’s like a normal person with $50k invested losing about $3500 on a stock. You’ll notice it. But it doesn’t change your day any.

(Dunno about the math, might be off)

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 156 points 2 days ago

It'll take a while, but I do believe we're watching the downfall of Twitter.

And I suspect, now that Bluesky is the clear successor to Twitter, the process will only accelerate.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 2 days ago

Give it 6 months and then musky's well funded administration will find a way to make bluesky feel the legal crunch

[-] nexusband@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

They can just shift countries. 32% of Bluesky users are from Brazil, ~ 7% from Japan, ~ 4% from the UK and 2% from Germany.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Likely there will be an exodus of web services that don't want to trade the further loss of Article 230 and the requirement of Christofascist cemsorship for even less taxes and zero worker protections.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Truth social hasn’t failed yet, it could lose money and it would just be a propaganda service that costs money instead of making money.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It’s not going to have ~~funding~~ bribing problems until Trump is out of office.

[-] Horsey@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

MySpace didn’t die overnight; didn’t it take like 8 years for Facebook to overtake it? Anecdotally in my group of friends, the big exodus from MySpace to Facebook took like 2 years from ‘08-‘10

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It just occurred to me that the reason I don't remember those events, and have no basis to compare, because I had already left the platforms. Same for Digg.

I deleted my personal and business Twitter account the day Musk took over.

[-] Easton89@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yes you are right at this point!

[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ahaha YES!

So unfortunate that it had to be this way though, Twitter was the perfect name for such a social media app.

[-] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 2 days ago

Who cares...it's just changing one shitpile for the next soon-to-be shitpile. Bluesky will inevitably go down the shitter too once its users have enough inertia to keep them there as they squeeze them dry.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago

Twitter isn't falling due to not being open source, or not being decentralized, or any of the other reasons I've heard people advocate for mastodon.

People are leaving twitter because it has gone fully right wing in politics. Twitter will not "fail" in the traditional sense. Twitter will fall, but not fail.

Twitter will be the right wing conspiracy platform.

Bluesky will be what twitter was 5 years ago for the left wing.

Nothing else has changed. This isn't a rebellion against corporate social media. This isn't meant to be a fediverse uprising. None of that is happening. This is nothing more than Mary, and Beth who voted for Harris wanting to use twitter how they used to, without right wing agenda being added to their twitter feed. Which is exactly what bluesky is. A twitter clone without the racists.

[-] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Dare I suggest that the reason for twitter becoming so right wing, is that it's a centralized social media website, subject to the crazed far right whims of the capitalist who bought it...

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Twitter went right wing because of the model.

When it’s all about following people and very short forms of communication, it will eventually lean right.

Same way the lemmy format encourages nuance and ideas over people, so it will eventually lean left

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Bluesky is at least semi-decentralized, however, though not to the same extent as something like Mastodon

I'd also argue that Twitter is also uniquely bad even among other problematic platforms

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

Bluesky is at least semi-decentralized

No it isn't, this is marketing and until the developers actually put their money where their mouth is and provide the genuine capacity for decentralization (not just along some narrow technical definition but actually decentralized in practice) this is pure marketing hype that you absolutely shouldn't trust until you are given indisputable proof and then you should still be skeptical because they can always pull the rug out from under you.

Bluesky is open source yes, but what they are talking about is the CLIENT side of Bluesky, the actual system is dependent upon proprietary code that is most definitely not open source.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

It's actually more so the other way around. The backend (PDS and relays) is open source but I believe the AppView is not currently open source

https://github.com/bluesky-social/pds

https://github.com/bluesky-social/indigo

https://github.com/bluesky-social/jetstream

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Shatur@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Yep, and for anyone who curious why it's not actually decentralized, I highly suggest to read this thread from someone who worked on ActivityPub:

https://social.coop/@cwebber/113527462572885698

And part 2:

https://social.coop/@cwebber/113647109852249805

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 10 points 2 days ago

If nothing else I will personally find it very funny if Elon Musk spent $44,000,000,000 on something and then unintentionally destroyed it in just three years

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago

He didn't spend 44 billion on twitter. He spent 44 billion to gain a hand in the 2024 election. He already won.

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 4 points 2 days ago

I'm still going to enjoy it if I get to watch the $44b not buy any more elections. I know he can afford to do it again, but you've got to take what joy you can get from the world, you know?

The Saudis footed the bill for most of that $44bn - most is only out of pocket about $10bn of it iirc.

Fwiw he didn't actually intend to buy it, he was shitposting and got nailed by the SEC, only THEN did he try to work out what to do with it.

Unfortunately the "what" turned out to be destroying democracy and helping Trump turn the US into a feudal state

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

The Saudis footed the bill for most of that $44bn - most is only out of pocket about $10bn of it iirc.

I mean they definitely got their money's worth in terms of torpedoing one of the most threatening social media tools for politically destabilizing authoritarian regimes.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago

Anyone who wants to see everything Musk owns crash and burn?

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
461 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

59964 readers
2872 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS