768
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Can confirm. He didn't do nuthin

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Maybe the lack of quick access to life saving resources, procedures and experts immediately after the shooting, aka 'healthcare', was what actually killed him?

[-] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 316 points 3 days ago

Speaking to CBS, the BBC's US partner, on Sunday, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said that the online rhetoric has been "extraordinarily alarming".

"It speaks of what is really bubbling here in this country," he said. "And unfortunately we see that manifested in violence, the domestic violent extremism that exists."

Did he care about the domestic violent extremism before it started to affect the wealthy? What about the domestic terrorists who go after the queer community, POC communities, women, doctors providing reproductive healthcare...the list goes on.

Violent extremism isn't new here. It's just that this one affects people with power.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 87 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You’ve got far right militias blowing up America’s electric grid infrastructure, threatening politicians, having standoffs on federal property, and patrolling hurricane impacted areas trying to capture federal employees that are there helping, and I’ve never heard those people referred to as terrorists.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 102 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah, the rules of society say they won and they think all the losers beneath them just have to accept it. The social order and status quo are great for them. That something would violate it is extremely disturbing to them and provokes an emotional response.

I think that's why they seem to be so clumsily overreacting to the murder. Maybe it's working in segments of the population I don't see, but everyone in my social network is either outright happy it happened or at least get why it happened. Some will have perfunctory "murder is wrong" statements, but the thrust is about what a corrupt and evil business health insurance is. That's all the way up to the boomers and crosses political boundaries.

Things like the perp walk, excessive charges, and corporate comedy pretending everyone just thinks Mangione is a bad guy just highlights the us vs. them of class war rather than trying to somehow quell or redirect the bubbling unrest. I think they're doing this because their peers and masters are emotionally demanding a visible and recognizable show of power and obedience. If they knew what was good for them they'd be triple-timing it to make some token effort to reform the system, but even a token effort in response to the killing of a rich person would infuriate them, so clumsy performances it is.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 56 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

When my usually "civil" boomer dad said he gets why he did it and wasn't outright condemning him, I knew the ruling class wasn't in control of the narrative as per usual this time.

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 49 points 3 days ago

My 75 year old Canadian aunt laughed when I showed her this

Everyone hates these people except the people who want to be these people.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm actually rather impressed that so many people get what's actually happening here. I don't know if it'll ultimately amount to anything, but it shows that it is actually possible to get through to people sometimes. It's a shame that no avenue but violence has been left to us to do so.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 91 points 3 days ago

This makes me believe it really wasn't him. If he actually wrote a manifesto, he'd have declared himself guilty, taken credit, and done a speech about how he was now a martyr for the cause.

If he's sticking to his story, then I believe him. They couldn't find the real killer so they just went with whoever "fit the description", as per usual.

[-] arc@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Of course it was him. That doesn't mean from a legal perspective he is best served by pleading guilty. Pleading not guilty also means he'll get a jury trial and his lawyers can introduce evidence that embarrasses private health insurance providers, or proves his state of mind, or otherwise casts doubt.

[-] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 day ago

I tend to think it's because they charged him as a terrorist. I assume it's a different law in which case he might be able to prove it's not terrorism.

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago

Innocent until proven guilty. It's the government's job to prove him guilty. He doesn't have to help them.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago

If Innocent until proven guilty, why the fuck do we lock people up to await their court date?

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Because it makes money, and a splash of long standing racism

[-] iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

You can plug this answer verbatim into almost any "why does the US do this bad thing?"

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Wouldn’t be surprised if he was in New York on some legitimate business, they caught him on camera at a Starbucks near the murder, blasted his image all over the news and social media, and just waited for someone to call.

Then when they got the call, they grabbed a backpack with “evidence” and claimed he had it on him when they arrested him.

Did anyone believe that he was wondering around for 3 days with a bag that was holding the murder weapon, fake IDs, and a hand written manifesto? He ditched another bag, and escaped on an e-bike. Why would he then run around for three days with the rest of the evidence.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

Either he is the dumbest man alive, or the police really wanted to just go with the first guy who fit the description knowing that they'll look like heroes to their corporate overlords, and that if another guy bites the dust they can just say it was a copycat.

[-] Hlodwig@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Its obviously NOT him, footage from the murder shows thin eyebrows, white skin (like Irish white) and way smaller dude than Luigi... I still cant understand that people still believe Luigi could be the killer...

[-] FJW@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

That’s now how it works: In the US “justice”-system there are only extremely limited cases where it makes sense to plead guilty, because it pretty much just means that you skip the trial and get sentenced directly. Especially if you want Jury-nullification, you have to plead non-guilty so that the Jury can find you innocent despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

What overwhelming evidence in this case? The evidence made public definitely seems to imply he's not the one who shot the CEO.

Why would a person take such a carefully planned route through the city to Central Park, change clothes and dump their bag, only to keep their gun, fake IDs and hand written manifesto/confession on their person three days later while eating lunch at a restaurant? If Luigi was the shooter and looking to take credit as what has been released of the manifesto implies, why hide out for three days instead of publicly turning themselves in after informing the press so it's recorded and likely televised?

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Personally, I am sad that is all it takes for you to believe something. Businesses, media, governments, and more are trying to make people believe things (unrelated to luigi) that aren't true. You need to raise the bar, not lower it. Maybe you want to believe he didn't do it, but I hope you don't actually believe that based on so little information.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

I mean, if he can away with it while not undermining his original intentions, why not do it?

There's various ways he could go unpunished that would prevent a retrial and so he'd then be set up to be influential in some kind of healthcare reform.

Heavy on the cope though.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 154 points 3 days ago

Its fucked up the news is acting like Sandy Hook wasn't a decade ago. All this guy is accused of is shooting a CEO.

[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 54 points 3 days ago

Maybe if it happens enough, we can normalize billionaire CEO murder as well.

[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago

CEO or not, billionaires gotta go

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Ya you don't have to be a CEO to hold massive investments across the board

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 56 points 3 days ago

Sandy hook was instead normalized, and happens multiple times over across the nation annually. Pew pew ‘muricuh

[-] papertowels@mander.xyz 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This is the disheartening part that highlights the class divide. Shootings of common folk barely make the news where I'm from. How much have taxpayers paid for this so far? Justice clearly isn't being applied equally.

[-] Woht24@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago

The problem here is the frequency of the crimes. If CEOs were being shot on a weekly to bi weekly average in groups of 3 or more, this crime would become one of the many others the American media wash over.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 34 points 3 days ago

That sounds like a challenge

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 224 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

His lawyer made a great point about how law enforcement and the media threw "alleged" out the window and just insisted he did it...

What's disappointing is it's apparently working because when I do see and "allegedly" thrown in, people are down voting it like it's a conspiracy.

People always want to act like propaganda can't effect them, but the whole country immediately accepted that he was guilty because of a tiny change in reporting from the norm.

But especially with the wrinkle that someone brought it up to the McD's worker and then she snitched....

I think the cop's have a reason they're sure, it's just they got that reason illegally thru means we're not supposed to know they have. Which explains a lot of shit.

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 87 points 3 days ago

Frankly I still question if he’s a lookalike scapegoat so the police can save face and try to put it to bed. May also explain the odd “planted” evidence that is being mentioned.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 63 points 3 days ago

Eh, if he was a real random fall guy, they wouldn't have picked a rich handsome guy in his mid 20s.

Like, it's almost most definitely him...

But fuck the cops, fuck the wealthy, and fuck the healthcare industry. They need to prove it beyond reasonable doubt and all those groups are habitual liars.

So if I was on the jury, they'd need a lot of evidence and need to be able to explain how they got it. They used some illegal spy tech shit because it's a rich victim? Then all evidence gained after gets thrown out.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 119 points 3 days ago

The terrorism "charges" are laughably flimsy and clearly contrived. Trumped Up, you might say.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 28 points 3 days ago

The terrorism charge is absolutely the dumbest thing they did. Now it's on them to prove it was more than just murder.

[-] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 73 points 3 days ago

I mean last I counted he had like 200000 alibis so...

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago

Luigi Mangione was with me December 3rd, 2024 through December 7th, 2024. He couldn't possibly have been in New York since i don't live there.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago
[-] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 77 points 3 days ago

Someone commented that they're REALLY trying to take a bad photo of him. Literally anything they can play off as malicious, unhinged, or even "thuggish," but every single time the man pulls a barney stinson. They tried putting him in a suicide smock (which I strongly question, even in psychiatry I've only had to use one a handful of times in almost ten years). They even tazed him until he pissed himself and he's standing tall with his chin up. The man cannot take a bad photo and while I hate to say it's true it probably will actuality give him an advantage in the court proceedings.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sudo@programming.dev 37 points 3 days ago

In addition to a long stream of journalists waiting for the suspect to appear, members of the public - almost all of them young women - were in court, some of whom told CBS, the BBC's US partner, that they were there to show their support.

(emphasis mine)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
768 points (98.9% liked)

News

23655 readers
3265 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS