No one but Deutsche Bank is surprised by this.
Well then why do you keep giving the chucklefuck loans…?
Different rules when you're rich.
*pretending to be rich
If you own the bank ten thousand dollars, it's your problem.
If you owe the bank ten billion dollars, it's their problem.
If they suddenly all go "this guy can't have any more loans", then they won't get paid back. Nobody wants to be the one without the chair when the music stops.
Because Russian oligarchs told them to?
Normal people applying for loan: "bend over and relax, I'm going to check your financial status inside out."
Asshats like Trump apply: "he looks rich. Let's give him all we've got."
If all we get out of this is a public, accurate picture of Trump's finances, I'll be ok. I would prefer some jail time (from criminal prosecutions) but don't want to sound vindictive or greedy.
ayo ill sound vindictive.
Let's punch him in the cock.
Grab his dick and twist it
Twist that DIIIICK!
The oolllleee dick twist
I chortled and I'll second that!
Give 'im the oooolllll' Cock Punch.
Wanting someone to be held accountable for their decades long crime sprees isn’t vindictive or greedy; I’d argue it’d just be (long) delayed justice.
Look how..he looks.
My god... Such tiny hands
Fuck the lot of ‘em.
They were shocked - SHOCKED- to find out that he was a liar.
DB is a criminal enterprise, now it's trying to cut ties with Donnie.
Ok. He deceived a nation. And he succeeded. He's not in jail, so he's still succeeding. Any further news?
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News