13
submitted 1 year ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Of course they're not real. They're reproductions of reality. This has been true of images since cave paintings.

[-] simple@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

That's not what the article is about and I'm impressed how many people in the comments completely missed the point.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Maybe if the article actually got to the point instead of rambled on and on about “thirst traps” and the like, it would be more obvious what it was actually (trying to be) about.

[-] rediot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's bc the article sucks.

[-] aleq@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

This is what happens when you think you have a story, but it turns out you don't. Image editing apps exist and are getting easier to use, big whoop?

I for sure thought this was gonna be about "AI cameras". Seems all phones nowadays have some kind of software to make the camera seem less shitty, but nope, it's about people making a choice to edit their photos.

[-] funker@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

nice misleading title

[-] Miclux 15 points 1 year ago

Welcome to our new counterfeit reality.

Does the author use Internet Explorer 5.0?

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago

This has been the situation for over a decade. The real news (likely within the next year) will be when we can no longer trust video.

[-] simple@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

This article is talking mostly about generative AI features like the ones in the new Pixel phone. There's a big difference between filters and minor touchups and entirely changing the position of people and objects in a few taps.

[-] Johanno@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Great so now the tools are getting in the hands of the people

[-] zecg@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

none of your

This hand-wringing bullshit would feel much more weighty if a FOSS alternative with manual controls didn't exist available for free on the same OS and the same device: https://f-droid.org/packages/net.sourceforge.opencamera/

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Love OpenCamera, this is pretty much my camera app of choice.

If I need extra image processing (e.g. Night Sight) I use modded GCam with one of its many modes

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The default setting for the default camera on my phone already "enhances" your appearance by making your eyes bigger and trying to squash your jaw line. I hate that I can't even change it so that the filter is always off; I have to disable it manually every time I go to take a picture.

[-] Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Such a shitty mobile site.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
13 points (58.9% liked)

Technology

59570 readers
3354 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS